Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 4

September 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 4, 2016.

Mother Teresa/Mother Teresa (Adam Carr's original text)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Mother Teresa/Mother Teresa (Adam Carr's original text) → Mother Teresa (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mother_Teresa/Mother_Teresa_(Adam_Carr%27s_original_text)&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-08-05&end=2016-09-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Mother_Teresa%2FMother_Teresa_%28Adam_Carr%27s_original_text%29 stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect is not relevant anymore and should be deleted. JMHamo (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete implausible search. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Absolutely not a helpful redirect. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The two opposing views of Mother Teresa

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The two opposing views of Mother Teresa → Mother Teresa (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_two_opposing_views_of_Mother_Teresa&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-08-05&end=2016-09-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_two_opposing_views_of_Mother_Teresa stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * The Two Opposing Views of Mother Teresa → Mother Teresa (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Two_Opposing_Views_of_Mother_Teresa&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-08-05&end=2016-09-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_Two_Opposing_Views_of_Mother_Teresa stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect is not relevant anymore and should be deleted. JMHamo (talk) 22:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete no such book. This has come up on searches recently because of a Weekly Standard news article saying with regards to Hillary Clinton and Mother Teresa, "even though the two had opposing views" HERE AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Combining similar RFDs. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Samurai (2014 film)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The Samurai (2014 film) → Gavin O'Connor (director) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Samurai_(2014_film)&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-08-05&end=2016-09-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_Samurai_%282014_film%29 stats])     [ Closure:  ]

There is a German 2014 film of that name unrelated to O'Connor, but no article, and nowhere to link as subtopic or list entry. Redirect is not in use. Paradoctor (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

See also Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradoctor (talk • contribs) 00:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete probably better off as redlink to encourage the creation of the film's article -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per . AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There was a lot of hoopla five years ago when O'Connor was paid for this script, but it's now sunk into the vast ocean of stalled movies. It certainly didn't come out in 2014. — Gorthian (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

افلام سكس

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * افلام سكس → Pornographic film (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%B3&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-08-05&end=2016-09-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85_%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%B3 stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Apparently an Arabic phrase (aflām seks) meaning "sex videos". Textbook example of unnecessary WP:RFOREIGN. Uanfala (talk) 08:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: It was created because it was receiving over 600 hits a day. Now it receives about a hundred. I can't imagine anything other than people typing typing by mistake into the wrong search engine. Uanfala (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RFFL. All those hits could have arisen from some obscure meme in the Arabic-speaking world. — Gorthian (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looks like an open-and-shut case. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.