Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 28

February 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 28, 2017.

Jagaimo
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Japanese ingredients.  -- Tavix  ( talk ) 22:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Jagaimo → Potato (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jagaimo&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No affinity for Japanese. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep due to no valid policy-based reason given for deletion. Not having an affinity for Japanese is not a valid reason for deletion. Additionally, the redirect provides a way for anyone searching for "jagaimo" to find out what it is. That's the whole point of redirects: to redirect a searcher to the common term. Redirects are cheap. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 22:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget per below. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 00:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FORRED. Steel1943  (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Striking out opinion and now neutral per proposed resolution mentioned below by AngusWOOF since the redirect is now mentioned somewhere. Steel1943  (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That's neither a policy nor a guideline. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not, but it's an essay for common results at WP:RFD ... which I agree with, so this I'm citing it as rationale for my deletion opinion. Steel1943  (talk) 03:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_Japanese_ingredients as a gathering place for Japanese vegetables. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I would support this as this would be the audience likely searching for it. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * An issue I see with this is that it's currently not mentioned at the proposed location. Steel1943  (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * added to list. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List_of_Japanese_ingredients per User:AngusWOOF now that it is mentioned there -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All your edits so far
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * All your edits so far → Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_your_edits_so_far&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A rather peculiar redirect that meets WP:R. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:R, that it's proven useful, and reason I gave for creating it: 'I think others dealing with user conduct in this area might find this a useful redirect when filling in the "which article" bit in Twinkle when the behaviour is from a SPA'. - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 19:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete since I'm pretty sure my account is not a single-purpose account. Steel1943  (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh? - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 19:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Exactly. It's a WP:SURPRISE since this redirect is telling me that all my edits belong to a single-purpose account, and as far as I can tell, I'm not a single-purpose account. Steel1943  (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, it was made for filling in warning templates when SPAs are doing the same spam or COI disruption on a bunch of interconnected articles, not to be thrown at people who aren't misbehaving. Like WP:BEANS isn't about offering someone a snack :) . - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 20:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - "Well, it was made for filling in warning templates..." and "Like WP:BEANS"; links can be piped and WP:BEANS is prefaced by "Wikipedia:" (i.e. in a different namespace) respectively. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. I contemplated suggesting a move to Wikipedia space, but I'd actually expect the title to link to Special:Mycontributions rather than the present target. Thryduulf (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This doesn't appear to be really useful, and I don't see a solid justification for keeping it. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a bit confusing even for our editors as discussed above. I think it wouldn't be helpful for our readers as well since I don't think they are familiar with SPA's like we do -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chowz
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Chowz → Jat people (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chowz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A WP:SPA created an article at this title back in 2011, but it was quickly tagged for original research and redirected. However, I don't see evidence of a connection between the nickname(?) and the target. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no clear primary topic for this search term on google, with various different non-notable people with this surname/nickname and more than one local fast food outlet among other miscellaneous uses, none in the first four pages obviously related to the current target. Thryduulf (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any notables for this in searches. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find good targets for this term in google. I'm going for useless/ confusing redirect -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ulf Bergman
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Ulf Bergman → Sweden (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ulf_Bergman&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No obvious connection Peter Rehse (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are multiple people by this name, one of whom has an article on the Swedish Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You mean none of them? Because the article you linked to is a redlink. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * nope, I mean one of them - sv:Ulf Bergman. The link above has a typo ("Berman"). Thryduulf (talk) 01:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:R 5 nonsense. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not listed in target article. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * delete per WP:REDLINK as a potential article can be made as the Champ shows a sv.wiki article with the same name -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Different snakes
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Different snakes → List of snake genera (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Different_snakes&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The use of the word "different" is vague. It could be also be used to refer to different snakes of the same species. Steel1943 (talk) 17:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not a category of snake. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought of different variations of Snake (video game) when I first read it. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete due to vague "different" adjective -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of every... redirects
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 11%23List of every... redirects

The greatest album in the world
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The greatest album in the world → Making Waves (The Nolans album) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_greatest_album_in_the_world&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I doubt it. That, and the redirect has even been retargeted during its existence. (Also, an additional note: Best album is a redirect that targets Best.) Steel1943  (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I doubt it too. The closest I can find for an appropriate target is Lists of number-one albums, but chart topping ≠ "greatest". We'd need a list analogous to List of films considered the best, and I'm not seeing one. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete was never used for any kind of useful greatest albums list. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have articles Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, NME's The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, The 100 Greatest Slovak Albums of All Time and The 150 Greatest Indonesian Albums of All Time but I don't think this is a useful search term for any of these. If we had something equivalent to List of music considered the worst or List of films considered the best then I would support retargeting to there, however if we do have such an article or list it isn't at an obvious title nor is it in Category:Lists of albums. Thryduulf (talk) 10:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. IMAO - it isn't. Blatant WP:FANCRUFT. Any redirect elsewhere would be WP:SUBJECTIVE. Narky Blert (talk) 01:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete it's supposed to link to my mixtape . due to vagueness. I also concur with the above editors that there are no existing articles that this redirect can point to -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Domestic violence in Ghana
Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: resolved 
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was resolved. The target article has been moved to this title. --BDD (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Domestic violence in Ghana → Wife beating in Ghana (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domestic_violence_in_Ghana&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I think Wife beating in Ghana should either be re-titled Domestic violence in Ghana or merged as they about the same subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwanyewest (talk • contribs) 12:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Argyll Ferries LTD
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  (non-admin closure) –  Uanfala (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Argyll Ferries LTD → Argyll Ferries (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argyll_Ferries_LTD&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No-one (well, almost no-one) would ever write LTD rather than Ltd. Pam  D  13:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as superfluous: the common name is Argyle Ferries, generally used in its branding. On the few occasions where the full title is used, it appears as Argyll Ferries Limited. . dave souza, talk 15:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Argyll Ferries Ltd already exists and is how the phrase is used in news articles. No such usage of all caps in any logos or literature. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe that, officially, limited companies in the United Kingdom may use any of "LTD", "L.T.D." or "Limited" in any of all caps, all lower case or first letter capitalised (and similarly for PLC). Thryduulf (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment This redirect came into being from an inappropriate page move which I reverted. While retaining the redirect probably isn't strictly necessary, given that Argyll Ferries Ltd also exists, it also isn't doing any harm by being there. The initial move and comment above suggest that some people might use the unusual "LTD" format. Jellyman (talk) 08:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't look unusual to me as an American. If all caps here are especially rare in British usage, I could see a weak MOS:TIES argument, but Thryduulf's comment suggests that that's not the case. No harm here. --BDD (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * in modern usage an all-caps LTD is uncommon when the main part of the name is not also in all caps, but I wouldn't say it's rare enough to be a reason for deletion. Absent evidence of usage, I would argue for deletion of "LIMITED" in all caps when the rest of the company name is not presented that way, but LTD (in any capitalisation) is significantly more common than "Limited" (in any capitalisation) in contemporary usage. Thryduulf (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as a valid alternative form. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Meh keep. It's a weak, but plausible and harmless redirect. The fact that the page once resided there gives a small amount of extra weight to keeping this particular variant. There's a non-zero chance that some link outside Wikipedia points here. Alsee (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 15:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as alternative capitalization. Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as alternative capitalisation. I don't think "LTD" is a particularly uncommon capitalisation. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">WJBscribe (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per BDD. Steel1943  (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm not sure if this is useful or not, but it seems harmless, as stated above, and I'm inclined to leave it alone as well. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Robert Brown (botanist)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 9%23Robert Brown (botanist)

Robert Charles Dallas
Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: procedural close <div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was procedural close; converted to article. --BDD (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Robert Charles Dallas → Robert Dallas (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Charles_Dallas&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Currently redirects to Robert Dallas, (1756-1824) a different person. This title should refer to Robert Charles Dallas, 1754-1824, who is in the ODNB and the of "The Morlands", and others. DuncanHill (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Dallas baronets where there is a mention of that full name (since the nominator's person doesn't have an article). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have created the required article at Robert Charles Dallas, so close. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Close as nominator and thank for creating the required article. DuncanHill (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.