Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 13

January 13
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 13, 2017.

Mario (series)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget both to Mario (franchise). Thryduulf (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Mario (series) → Super Mario (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_(series)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mario series → Super Mario (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_series&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

...And now, it seems that I have to open this one for discussion as well. (See Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 13.) Should these redirects target their current target (Super Mario) or Mario (franchise)? I'm opening this up for discussion to form consensus due to slow back-and-forth editing of these redirects for the past 3 years. (For the record, I'm for keep-ing the redirects targeting Super Mario.) Steel1943  (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, see Talk:Super Mario (disambiguation) for possibly related consensus. Steel1943  (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging a few editors I'm aware of being involved in WP:VG with no knowledge of how they will comment in this discussion: Ferret, Salvidrim!, Sergecross73 and The1337gamer. Steel1943  (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, pinging Czar since they participated in the aforementioned move discussion, and I've seen them edit video game-related pages from time to time. Steel1943  (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Retarget both to Mario (franchise). There's many different Mario series: Super Mario, Mario Kart, Mario Party, Mario & Luigi, Paper Mario, and more. While Super Mario may be the most well known, I'd consider the term "Mario series" to refer to the superset of all these different series. Therefore, I think the franchise article would be the best target for these. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Mario (franchise), per The1337gamer. -- ferret (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retain. The "Mario series" refers to the main series featuring Mario, not the entire franchise. This main series is known as Super Mario. I think the separate notability of a "Super Mario" series apart from the rest of the franchise is dubious based on the current sourcing, but as it stands, I think the current redirect is appropriate. I've written several articles across the franchise, and it would be inappropriate to change the target of those links based on what readers expect on the other side. Editors who want to link to the entire Mario franchise already know to link to it specifically. czar  19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget - per The1337gamer. Sergecross73   msg me  19:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Little Mermaid (series)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget. Thryduulf (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The Little Mermaid (series) → The Little Mermaid (TV series) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Little_Mermaid_(series)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Should this be retargeted to The Little Mermaid (franchise)? I would imagine that readers looking up a "(series)" disambiguator are trying to find information for the franchise and not the TV series. Compare this to Mario (series) (redirects to its respective series article) and Mario (franchise); since The Little Mermaid doesn't have separate series and franchise articles, the "series" is probably the "franchise". Steel1943 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Retarget, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget given the Disney franchise has multiple series: the TV series, the films sort of, but there's also a bunch of book series under the printed adaptations section. Reconsider to dab page if other series become more prominent. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget as per the above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Naomi van Dooren

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Naomi van Dooren → Ariel (Disney) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naomi_van_Dooren&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target article. Also, delete per WP:REDLINK: see de:Van Dooren Sisters. Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete She voices Ariel in some of the German dubs, but as an actor and singer is not strongly tied to Ariel. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Litigators (film)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The Litigators (film) → The Litigators (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Litigators_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The target is a novel, not a film. Delete as misleading as someone searching this would be looking for a film. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete the creator of the redirect, probably felt that content from the film adaptation could be found in the original work. However, in this case no content is present at that target.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete until the film is produced. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

In Africa

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * In Africa → Africa (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=In_Africa&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not a likely search term for the target, consider, In Europe, for example, there are exact topics with that title, just as there are with this one, but we don't seem to have articles on any of those. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - It was created by accident; I wasn't aware it still existed. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Unlikely search term. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sebastian (The Little Mermaid

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Sebastian (The Little Mermaid → Sebastian (Disney) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sebastian_(The_Little_Mermaid&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely and possibly WP:COSTLY redirect due to the missing ")" at the end of the disambiguator. Also, Sebastian (The Little Mermaid) (with the ")" at the end"), exists. Steel1943  (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. P p p er y 22:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Right now it's attracting the "Sebastian little mermaid" or "Sebastien little mermaid" searches as it is listed ahead of the properly formatted term, but deleting it will make the latter useful right away. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Mission (2015 film)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete all. Thryduulf (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="The Mission (2015 film)">The Mission (2015 film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Mission_(2015_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Mission (2014 film)">The Mission (2014 film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Mission_(2014_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Ends of the Earth (film)">The Ends of the Earth (film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Ends_of_the_Earth_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Sammy's Hill (film)">Sammy's Hill (film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sammy%27s_Hill_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Old St. Louis (film)">Old St. Louis (film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Old_St._Louis_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Legacy of Secrecy (film)">The Legacy of Secrecy (film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Legacy_of_Secrecy_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Legacy of Secrecy (film)">Legacy of Secrecy (film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Secrecy_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Legacy of Secrecy (2014 film)">Legacy of Secrecy (2014 film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Secrecy_(2014_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Legacy of Secrecy (2013 film)">Legacy of Secrecy (2013 film) → David O. Russell (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Secrecy_(2013_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. None of these films are mentioned at the target article, presumably these are in development hell. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom, especially the ones with years as they were never released. Some could go to books if they have a significant adaptation section, but given that none of these are actually produced, there's no useful information to redirect to. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twin Earths (film)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="Twin Earths (film)">Twin Earths (film) → Twin Earths (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twin_Earths_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete, this is not a film, but a comic strip. There's no mention of any associated films at the target. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There are films and TV series that talk about Earth analog like Another Earth and Doppelgänger (1969 film) so there could be a potential list of some sort, as with List of fictional living planets, but none with this particular title for now. Also found Counter-Earth. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disney Sing Along Songs: Honor to Us All
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Disney Sing-Along Songs. In other words, I'm withdrawing this as the proposed target is obviously the intended target. Steel1943  (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Disney Sing Along Songs: Honor to Us All → Honor to Us All (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disney_Sing_Along_Songs:_Honor_to_Us_All&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The current target may be the best target for this redirect, but the redirect is not mentioned at the target article and it's a very unlikely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy retarget to Disney Sing-Along Songs. --BDD (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Darling
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget American Darling to The Darling (novel). Delete American Darling (film). Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * American Darling → Denis Villeneuve (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Darling&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="American Darling (film)">American Darling (film) → Denis Villeneuve (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Darling_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete, not mentioned at the target article. According to IMDb, the film is still stated as in development, so anything about it is WP:CRYSTAL -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak retarget American Darling to The Darling (novel), as it seems to be the alternative title as published in France and other countries, and is a key phrase at the end of the novel The article also has an adaptations page that connects it to Villeneuve but as a director, not the producer.  Delete American Darling (film) as nothing has been produced. If it makes it to direct-to-video or television movie status then reconsider redirecting to section. Other searches lead to American-Darling brand of fire hydrants or valves, some random paintings and blogs.  Note "America's Darling" would have its own dab issues.  <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:23, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Loudest noise in recorded history
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2%23Loudest noise in recorded history

The Picture of Dorian Gray (chapters)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (chapters)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (chapters) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(chapters)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 1)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 1) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_1)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 2)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 2) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_2)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 3)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 3) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_3)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 4)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 4) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_4)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 5)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 5) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_5)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 6)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 6) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_6)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 7)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 7) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_7)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 8)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 8) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_8)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 9)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 9) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_9)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 10)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 10) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_10)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 11)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 11) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_11)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 12)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 12) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_12)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 13)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 13) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_13)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 14)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 14) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_14)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 15)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 15) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_15)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 16)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 16) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_16)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 17)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 17) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_17)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 18)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 18) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_18)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 19)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 19) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_19)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 20)">The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 20) → The Picture of Dorian Gray (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray_(Chapter_20)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Wikipedia was a very different place a dozen years ago, so I don't want to disparage the work of the editor who put all of these together, but in hindsight, we can call firmly WP:NOT on this. The pages were essentially annotations to each chapter, including characters named and real-life entities referred to. The article on the novel mentions several chapters by name, but none with the depth of coverage implied by these redirects. Page views confirm they're quite unlikely as search terms too. --BDD (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Remove them all. But first, are there any pages linking to them? If so, change the links, too. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Commment talk:The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 12) notes that Articles for deletion/The Picture of Dorian Gray (Chapter 12) closed as merge and "This has already been done.". Check that these redirects are not required for attribution purposes. Thryduulf (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thryduulf: I don't think they are. The AfD comment you refer to was posted 17 March 2005. I checked the target article's history as of that month, which shows versions going back to September 2004, and there's no mention of merging in edit summaries. The creator of these redirects made several edits in early March 2005. Is any one of them a merge, as opposed to an interested editor working on several related pages? That seems a matter of semantics. Certainly the pages I've nominated were all his work, and the history of the target article retains his contributions in its history. --BDD (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all WP:NOTWIKIA / Not Cliffs Notes as this is a typical style for those articles.. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all per AngusWOOF, but check the redirects are not required for attribution purposes first per Thryduulf. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 17:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I agree completely. None of these are worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Steel1943  (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Outdoor Retreat
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 31%23Outdoor Retreat

Loudest man-made sound on Earth
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2%23Loudest man-made sound on Earth

Loudest Man in History
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2%23Loudest Man in History

Anni Sinnemaeki
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. The relisting did not result in any additional comments so I don't think another week or so will gain any more insight.Thryduulf (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Anni Sinnemaeki → Anni Sinnemäki (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anni_Sinnemaeki&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Paeivi Raesaenen → Päivi Räsänen (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paeivi_Raesaenen&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Neljae Ruusua → Neljä Ruusua (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neljae_Ruusua&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

(eubot) Finnish, not German. ä and ae are not equivalent in Finnish. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC) &+Paeivi Raesaenen (05:43 UTC) & Neljae Ruusua (05:53 UTC). Combined listings, exact same rationale. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 5:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep along the lines of this discussion where we talked about ae being an acceptable expansion of Finnish ä. But I don't feel much sympathy because they're bot-created. Deryck C. 17:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gentleman's sport
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Gentleman's sport → Boxing (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gentleman%27s_sport&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Too vague. Search results on and off of Wikipedia labeled golf, cricket, baseball, and even cockfighting (!) a "gentleman's sport". Boxing doesn't seem to have a special claim to the term, and the target article doesn't use it. BDD (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of most viewed kpop music videos
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 23%23List of most viewed kpop music videos

拳闘
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="拳闘">拳闘 → Boxing (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%8B%B3%E9%97%98&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Boxeo → Boxing (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boxeo&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

WP:FORRED. Boxing has no inherent connection with Japanese, Galician, or Spanish. --BDD (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Winter of 2010
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 23%23Winter of 2010

Winter of 2009-2100 in the United Kingdom
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Winter of 2009-2100 in the United Kingdom → Winter of 2009–10 in Europe (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winter_of_2009-2100_in_the_United_Kingdom&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete. The misleading typo makes it sound like the UK is in an ice age. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete this typo interferes with searches for "winter of 2009" <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It has no incoming links from ordinary articles or their talk pages, so I have deleted it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L calculus
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * L calculus → Lambda calculus (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L_calculus&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

(Eubot) Weak delete. I would have thought this spelling was quite common, but actually a Gsearch gives me pretty much 0 results for this being used in any sources to mean this (in fact, the first source I get has it meaning something completely different), and it's had only three hits in ninety days. Yet unlike, below, at least this makes some kind of sense, in not transliterating a Greek letter into a digraph. Si Trew (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as a . I don't find it difficult to imagine that a user seeing the phrase λ calculus might want to search for l calculus. – Uanfala (talk) 11:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not difficult to imagine, but in practice it doesn't seem to happen much, if at all. Si Trew (talk) 12:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 18:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Confusing. I've never seen anyone shorten lambda calculus to L calculus. There may potentially be something called L calculus, that isn't a lambda calculus. —Ruud 17:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. .  I'm finding naive PDF decoders making a bad call and doing normalization here.  Also unsure of who is expected to be confused by the redirect; this is not a proposal for a move or a page rewrite on the lambda calculus article. -- C. A. Russell ( talk ) 21:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unsourced Titanic passengers
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Millvina Dean and  to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 20:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Eliza Gladys Milvina Dean → RMS Titanic (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eliza_Gladys_Milvina_Dean&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * John van Billard → RMS Titanic (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_van_Billard&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Both unmentioned at target and. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 18:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment both of these originated as articles and were redirected without apparent discussion. The first was unsourced in it's most recent non-redirect revision, the second had two book references: "Judith Geller (1998) Titanic: Women and Children First. Haynes. ISBN 1 85260 594 4" and "Brian Ticehurst (1996) Titanic's Memorials World wide: Where they are Located. ISBN 1 871733 05 7". Thryduulf (talk) 19:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Bold retarget Eliza Gladys Milvina Dean to Millvina Dean which is a fully developed article, and Retarget John van Billiard to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC) update 19:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget the first redirect to the Millvina Dean page while I've no opinion on the other one. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget per AngusWOOF. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3909 04
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Legends and myths regarding RMS Titanic. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * 3909 04 → RMS Titanic (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3909_04&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per Snopes: "the first element fails the veracity test because the number 3909 04 was not assigned to the Titanic as a hull number or as any other type of number: her official Board of Trade designation was 131,428, and the yard number assigned to her by Harland & Wolff was 401." --Nev&eacute;–selbert 18:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as not discussed in target anyway even with a Snopes source. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Legends and myths regarding RMS Titanic where the myth is mentioned. Thryduulf (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Good find! striking vote. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * When a Titanic-related redirect gets nominated here it's always worth checking to see if the relevant content is (now) in one of the many (many) sub- and related articles. I'm not sure there is any other single event with quite so many different articles! Thryduulf (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WorldEdit
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * WorldEdit → Minecraft (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WorldEdit&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, the redirect's subject would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA as an article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Revert and send to AfD (or Prod). The content was not speediable and so should be subject to article deletion processes. Thryduulf (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mortal Kombat Ninjas
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Mortal Kombat Ninjas → Mortal Kombat (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mortal_Kombat_Ninjas&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per the history of the redirect, it seems that this term was meant to refer to the ninja characters in the Mortal Kombat series such as Sub-Zero, Scorpion and Smoke. However, I'm not finding a specific article or a section in an article which this term would be helpful targeting, especially considering that the redirect is already a borderline WP:NOTWIKIA violation. The best target I can find is List of Mortal Kombat characters, but not even that page has a good section to refine this term. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete no such grouping within the game. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as unmentioned in the target article/non-notable game trivia. The closest plausible target that I have is Palette swap which describes Mortal Kombat and other games re-using sprites with different colors to save memory space -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of Mortal Kombat characters. Looking at the box art of the last few major installments (Mortal Kombat X, Mortal Kombat (2011 video game), and Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe), one could easily be mislead into thinking that the game's characters were mostly or even all ninjas. Given that some of the ninja characters are among the most well-known characters from the series, I'm comfortable retargeting to the character page. Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Even if it went to the characters article, it doesn't explain which of the characters are ninjas, especially if they're looking for the more prominent ninja characters like Sub-Zero, Scorpion, Kitana, Mileena, who immediately have their own article. Although I suppose once the user gets there, they can look through the entire list to further search for the ninja they want. I'll strike it for having some sort of use. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mortal Kimbat
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Mortal Kombat. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Mortal Kimbat → Mortal Kombat (disambiguation) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mortal_Kimbat&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely spelling error. In fact, it's so unlikely that apparently, no one has fixed it since it started targeting the disambiguation page over 8 years ago. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I would have assumed that this is an unlikely spelling error, but it got 58 page views last year - rather larger than many clearly plausible spelling errors, so I checked on google and it gets a lot of hits. Some of the hits are likely typos, but others seem deliberate so I'm wondering if there is some reason I don't understand for this. I say to keep pointing to the disambig page as there are many uses where it doesn't seem tied to one version of the game. Thryduulf (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Mortal Kombat, people looking for something else are easily lead to the disambiguation page, no reason to prefer the disambiguation page over the primary target. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget per as likely typo, i being next to o, and just one letter off. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget - I agree that this is a pretty plausible typo, and we should just go to 'Mortal Combat'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nominator comment: Though I still believe "delete" is the best option over all presented this far, I support "retarget to Mortal Kombat" over "keep" for the reasons already presented. Steel1943  (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgrelease tbl
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Template:Vgrelease tbl → Template:Vgrtbl (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vgrelease_tbl&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unused redirect template, should be deleted. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 11:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Very weak keep. The redirect was a former name of its target page. However, I am "very weak keep" since the template existed at that name for less than a month in September 2008. Steel1943  (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgrtbl-nolink
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Template:Vgrtbl-nolink → Template:Vgrtbl (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vgrtbl-nolink&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unused redirect template, should be deleted. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 11:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. The redirect was the original name of its target page. However, I am "weak" since the template existed at that name for only about 2 months: July 2008–September 2008. Steel1943  (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Video game release new
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Template:Video game release new → Template:Video game release (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Video_game_release_new&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unused redirect template, former template was merged into Video game release, should be deleted to unify the usage of Video game release or its short form Vgrelease. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 10:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. This is an R from merge. If the nominator feels that the content at this title should be deleted, then the template should probably be restored and then nominated for either WP:T3 speedy deletion or WP:TFD. Steel1943  (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The idea behind deleting the old template is post-merge clean-up. As discussed at Template talk:Video game release, we considered the deletion of it to be logical, as it is to no longer be confused with the merged Video game release template, so restoring the page would not be very logical. All occurences of this template have been remove by me on over 2,000 pages, wherefore it can now safely be deleted. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 12:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This discussion should probably happen at WP:TFD, not here. More or less, RFD is for accessing its value as a redirect, and I see that it has value due to its edit history (R from merge) and that the edit history may need to be retained due to WP:CWW. If the template is really of no use anymore and WP:TFD is not an option, consider restoring the template and marking it with Historical template. Steel1943  (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgreleasenew
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Template:Vgreleasenew → Template:Video game release (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vgreleasenew&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Vgrelease new → Template:Video game release (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vgrelease_new&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unused redirect template, former target was merged into Video game release, should be deleted to unify the usage of Video game release or its short form Vgrelease. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 10:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The nominated redirect formerly targeted Template:Video game release new, which now redirects to the same target as the nominated redirect. Makes sense to keep this redirect in place in the meantime. (However, if somehow before this discussion ends, if Template:Video game release new is restored as a template, I'd say retarget the nominated redirect there.) Steel1943  (talk) 14:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've bundled these two. Each had identical nomination statements and keep votes from Steel1943, down to the timestamps. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I'm not too sure, I'd rather we leave these redirects be. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Non Playable Characters in the Street Fighter series
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * List of Non Playable Characters in the Street Fighter series → Street Fighter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Non_Playable_Characters_in_the_Street_Fighter_series&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No such list exists at neither the target article nor at List of Street Fighter characters. Also, such a list's existence would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA as WP:GAMECRUFT. Steel1943 (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

That was from years ago and it's now redirect.Lg16spears (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak redirect to List of Street Fighter characters, which is sortable and may give the reader an idea of who is not playable after clicking sorting on the first column. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I find it hard to believe anyone would look up that particular title, just to be redirected. Also, "in the series" wouldn't allow for a character that was only playable once, because they did appear playable. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, your instinct is probably correct, because that's not how the page got started. It started as an actual list, with content that someone boldly decided was unwanted.  See the old version.  Has anyone  thoroughly checked that old content to make sure that we don't need to keep it for licensing reasons?  If even a sentence got copied to another article – even if it's not in the most recent revision of the article – then we probably need to keep this for licensing (aka "legal") reasons.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 *  Delete or Merge with Street Fighter  -  per Steel1943 !  Kosh  Vorlon }   17:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 17:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unlikely to redirect to anything in the long-term - "non-playable characters" are typically going to be a WP:GAMECRUFT violation. They generally considered trivial in fighting games. Sergecross73   msg me  16:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gergely Sarkoezy
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. A relisting hasn't generated any additional input at all, so relisting again doesn't seem likely to be productive. Thryduulf (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Gergely Sarkoezy → Gergely Sárközy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gergely_Sarkoezy&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Sarkoezi (surname)">Sarkoezi (surname) → Sarkozy (surname) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarkoezi_(surname)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Nagybocsai Sarkoezy → Sarkozy (surname) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagybocsai_Sarkoezy&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Nagybochai Sarkoezy → Sarkozy (surname) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagybochai_Sarkoezy&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Nicolas Paul Stephane Sarkoezy de Nagy-Bocsa → Nicolas Sarkozy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicolas_Paul_Stephane_Sarkoezy_de_Nagy-Bocsa&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Nicolas Sarkoezy → Nicolas Sarkozy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicolas_Sarkoezy&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is a follow-up to Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 24, closed as delete. If Sarkoez isn't a good redirect, then I would imagine that Sarkoezy would follow as they're both Hungarian. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the redirect for 'Sarkoezi (surname)'. If someone has no idea how to spell "Sarkozy", then typing in "Sarkoezi" appears to me plausible enough in terms of phonetics. An Anglosphere reader who knows little about European languages would be taking the "oe" from a word like "Oboe" and the "zi" from a word like "Nazi". I'm not sure about these redirects in total, though. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 17:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kavirat Rural District (dismabiguation)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="Kavirat Rural District (dismabiguation)">Kavirat Rural District (dismabiguation) → Kavirat Rural District (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kavirat_Rural_District_(dismabiguation)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete. Misspelled qualifier. NB Kavirat Rural District (disambiguation) exists. Narky Blert (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I fully expected this to be the result of a move after creating the proper page with a typo, but there have been no moves involved here and it post-dates the correctly spelled version. I've left a note on the creator's talk page (which the nominator should have done), but absent any explanation for why this exists I don't see a use for it. Thryduulf (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Niyog
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. I'll let Uanfala's disambiguation stand. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Niyog → Coconut (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niyog&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Possible retarget to Niyoga and remove the hatnote there per WP:NOTDIC because from what I can gather, this is a synonym for Niyoga, not sure exactly if it is the case, though, we don't have an expert on these matters who is a regular at RFD, AFAIK. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to Niyoga per nom and tag with either R from alternative spelling or R from alternative transliteration. In Sanskrit words, final short a (but not long ā) is generally dropped in most languages of northern India. As for the coconut, this appears to be a foreign name in some language of Philippines, but it's not mentioned at Coconut, while the possibly related niniyogan (which is mentioned there) and niyog-niyogan (mentioned at Combretum indicum) are too distinct to warrant linking from a hatnote. – Uanfala (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added a cited mention about the term where it is hypothesized that the plant came from the Malay-Indonesian region and that said similar local names are evidence for such claim. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate after Lenticel's additions to Coconut. Although I still the think the Hindu ritual is vaguely more likely as a primary topic, I don't think a hatnote pointing to Coconut could be worded in a way that is sensible. I've drafted a dab page below the redirect, which also includes two "see also" entries. – Uanfala (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chocolate crust
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was complicated. There's clear consensus to retarget to Raspberry Pi (with a hatnote) and  to list of pies, tarts and flans (I'll add an anchor to the list so it'll redirect directly to the correct entry). I find WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS to delete . A retargeting proposal to the list of pies was thoroughly objected to as a chocolate crust can be used for other types of desserts and a late suggestion to crust (baking) didn't receive any favor from anyone else. That leaves deletion, which was explicitly argued by two participants, and perhaps implied by another. That being said, I'll allow recreation of the redirect if the term can be discussed somewhere in a general sense. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 19:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--
 * Chocolate crust → Pie (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chocolate_crust&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Peach pie → Pie (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peach_pie&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Raspberry pie → Pie (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raspberry_pie&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target, except Raspberry_pie in a hatnote, so WP:R 10, as it will not be helpful to a reader. These are far from implausible search terms, but the current situation is misleading. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Raspberry pie should definitely point to Raspberry Pi somehow, either as in the current situation, or a redirect to Raspberry Pi, or a DAB page. I think the latter is perhaps the best. CapitalSasha ~ talk 06:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget per CapitalSasha. Raspberry Pie is a likely search result for an audio/dictation search for Raspberry Pi. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget Raspberry pie per CapitalSasha. Thryduulf (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget the others to List of pies. Thryduulf (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget per User:CapitalSasha&User:Thryduulf: Raspberry pie -> Raspberry Pi; others -> List of pies. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I concur with the proposals for Raspberry pie (but please leave a hatnote to the list of pies) and Peach pie, but I'm not sure I see the point of redirecting chocolate crust to that list. Sure, there's one type of pie mentioned there that has a chocolate crust, but aren't chocolate crusts found on top of all kinds of other desserts as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talk • contribs) 01:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't retarget Chocolate crust... I'd rather that we just delete that redirect. It could go to other things because regular ol' pies. Otherwise, I agree with going to 'Raspberry Pi' and 'List of pies' for the other two. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Re-target chocolate crust to Crust (baking). There are two kinds; one is a graham cracker crust made with chocolate cookies, and the other is a pie crust made with cocoa.  Re-targeting to pie crust saves you the trouble of figuring out which one the reader means.  Otherwise, I'd send both fruit pies to the List of pies, and add a hatnote to that list about the computers.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * <span id="Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election">Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election → Conservative Party (UK) leadership election, 2016 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Next_Conservative_Party_(UK)_leadership_election&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Leadership elections for the Conservative Party in the UK do not happen to any schedule, and sometimes occur on very little notice. The 2016 election has been and gone, there are no others planned and I am not aware of any encyclopaedic content currently speculating on a next election to retarget it to. There is no content about leadership elections generally at Conservative Party (UK) or Leader of the Conservative Party (UK) - it might be possible to write something at one or the other, but given that I have strong views about UK politics I am not comfortable with writing significant content in this subject area for NPOV and COI reasons. So unless someone else writes such content, my recommendation is delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm wary about this as well. Particularly having something that starts with the term "Next" when British politics is notoriously subject to radical shifts... deletion seems like the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The date and circumstances of the next leadership election are beyond all prediction. Narky Blert (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tylenol
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 20%23Tylenol

Wikipedia:WINING
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 20%23Wikipedia:WINING

Talkpage redirects
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Talk:James Mattis and Talk:Queen Elizabeth, respectively. Adding Old RfD tags to these pages would be confusing since thise templates are meant to represent a talk page's parent page, so syncing the talk pages with their parent pages' current target. However, I'm also closing this with the following statement, in case it needs to be said: If there is consensus to change the targets of Mad Dog Matis or Queen Liz in the future, there should be no controversy with syncing the two redirects nominated here by retargeting them to their parent page's new target. Also, it seems that Paine Ellsworth already synced Talk:Mad Dog Matis. (non-admin closure)  Steel1943  (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Talk:Mad Dog Matis → Talk:Mad Dog Matis (disc jockey) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mad_Dog_Matis&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Talk:Queen Liz → Talk:Queen Liz (criminal) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Queen_Liz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per WP:G7. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 00:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC) Housekeeping, I think. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Overwrite with WikiProject tags and the template (and anything else useful). Thryduulf (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want something deleted via WP:G7, just tag it as such. There's no need to bring it here. -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Except that G7 isn't possible since this is a redirect from a move to a title that Neve didn't create. P p p e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r y 22:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I routinely delete such redirects under G6, figuring them housekeeping since you don't want a talk page out of sync with its article. Alternatively, and especially for those without admin powers, retarget them, e.g., Talk:Mad Dog Matis to Talk:James Mattis. --BDD (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Whenever I come across talk pages of article-space redirects that are themselves redirects I replace it with relevant WikiProject tags, unless a WP:TALKCENT setup has been created. Thryduulf (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Talk:James Mattis and Talk:Queen Elizabeth, respectively. I still don't think it necessary to bring these here. If someone ever finds a talk page out of sync, resync it! -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The first U.S President
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943  (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The first U.S President → George Washington (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_first_U.S_President&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per WP:RTYPO. It's also mostly unused with its daily average rendering only 1. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 00:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as entirely harmless. It got 82 people to where they wanted to go last year so it's not really very implausible. Thryduulf (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Sounds like a good redirect to me. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I'm not sure about how useful this truly is, but I guess I lean to just keeping it, given the above. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that the typo-in-question is the lack of punctuation, i.e. The first U.S. President would be more acceptable.--Nev&eacute;–selbert 23:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed that and my recommendation above was written taking it into account. Thryduulf (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Even without the period what harm is this redirect causing if it gets people to the article they are looking for? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 03:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I pretty much agree with what Doc James said. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1000000000000000
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Orders of magnitude (numbers). -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * 1000000000000000 → Names of large numbers (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1000000000000000&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="1,000,000,000,000,000 (number)">1,000,000,000,000,000 (number) → Names of large numbers (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1,000,000,000,000,000_(number)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

delete or retarget. not names of large numbers. Voortle (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * retarget to Orders of magnitude (numbers) (1015) which gives the names of this number and some information about it. Thryduulf (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Orders of magnitude (numbers) as the number is at this target. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.