Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 1

June 1
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 1, 2017.

Bergen, the geographical name
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Bergen, the geographical name → Bergen (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bergen,_the_geographical_name&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible and very few pageviews. shoy (reactions) 19:21, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no one is going to search for this, and it is awkward English. - Richard Cavell (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. An article stood at this title for 9 days back in 2005. It was moved to and two months later it was redirected to Bergen. This is too little too long ago to make concerns about link rot relevant, and the redirect is implausible as a search term (39 views last year). – Uanfala 23:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete implausible, not a book title, not a useful search format. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This seems useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:51, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as useless due to lengthy modifier. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - because it is an implausible search term. Note that Bergen (geography) exists as a redirect, but Bergen (city) does not. - Richard Cavell (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vancouver (Vancouver Film Studios)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy delete.  There was a heliport at that location that is now closed. I should have deleted the redirect last August. Thanks  for finding it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Vancouver (Vancouver Film Studios) → Vancouver Film Studios (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vancouver_(Vancouver_Film_Studios)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Strange disambiguation: the studio is not called "Vancouver", it is "Vancouver Film Studios". No idea why this targets "Building C" within the skeleton article, nor why the redirect is categorized as a heliport and a certified airport. Suggest deletion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Samsung SGH-C417
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . While I certainly respect Thryduulf's position, this seems like one of those rare occasions where it's obvious the article isn't notable. At this point, restoring it and sending it to AfD might be a bit bureaucratic, so I feel comfortable carrying out the "delete" consensus here. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 21:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Samsung SGH-C417 → Samsung Telecommunications (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samsung_SGH-C417&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Product not mentioned in the target article. —Keφr 13:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom and WP:CATALOGUE. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 17:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Restore article without prejudice to AfD. WP:CATALOGUE is not relevant to redirects, but articles should not be deleted at RfD. This was PRODDED and then quickly redirected (by Knowledgekid87) and nominated here. There was no bad faith on this occasion but the precedent needs to remain clear that RfD is not an end-run around AfD. Thryduulf (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Turning pages into nonsensical redirects is not an end-run around the deletion process either. Should every redirect which used to be an article be challenged at AFD? I believe that would be quite a few. I doubt the article which was there before would stand at AFD either, but when someone responds to a deletion proposal by turning a page into a redirect, the redirect better defend itself on redirect terms. —Keφr 17:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your comment - I don't believe this redirect is a good idea, otherwise I would have recommended keeping or retargetting it. As for the general point, every redirect that: (a) used to be an article, (b) was redirected without discussion, (c) is nominated for deletion as a redirect, and (d) is not clearly a good redirect, should in my opinion be discussed at AfD rather than RfD. If not all of those conditions are true then RfD is fine. Thryduulf (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This doesn't appear to be a notable product, even in the narrow sense of looking specifically at Samsung's history. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Schildpadden
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Schildpadden → Turtle (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schildpadden&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete WP:FORRED, no affinity for Dutch. Recently created Plantdrew (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 08:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not a strong supporter of the WP:FORRED policy, but it is the policy and we must be consistent. - Richard Cavell (talk) 20:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This looks like an open-and-shut case for deletion. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.