Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 16

December 16
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 16, 2018.

Colin Kroll
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was procedural close  because an article has been created. If you still wish to pursue deletion, nominate the article at WP:AFD. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 01:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Colin Kroll → HQ Trivia (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colin_Kroll&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete this is a recent death. There is no reason to redirect this to "HQ Trivia" when he is the cofounder of Vine (service), a much more famous company. WP:REDLINK the article name pending a GNG-competent article. It should not redirect somewhere -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep He's getting substantial coverage in RS. There's enough information for an article. Davey2116 (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment the current redirect was created by redirection of an article by an editor who said there wasn't sufficient notability to support an article. The current situation of the redirect pointing to HQ Trivia seems like a poor choice to me, so REDLINKing the article name until an article with sufficient sourcing is created would be the path forward -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is more than enough material available from reliable sources to create an article. It should be referred to articles for creation. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If it is referred to AfC, the redirect will become a REDLINK and the article history would be moved to DRAFT: Colin Kroll, which would be fine by me, since it removes the poor redirect (but still shows up as a link to DRAFTspace with the non-existent page suggestion tool). I would suggest rolling back the draft to the stubby article that previously existed before the redirection overwrote it, if it moves to DRAFTspace -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Family game
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was move and retarget, then disambiguate. Thryduulf (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Family game → Family-friendly (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_game&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

It is a bit unclear why this redirect targets where it does. The only mention if the word "game" in the target article refers to "video games"; the word "game" is not exclusive to video games. This phrase could also in a way refer to board games. The current setup seems misleading. In addition, this redirect is an R with history about a subject that seems somewhat unrelated to anything I have mentioned thus far in this nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While Nintendo Entertainment System hardware clone does mention a "Family Game" console, the article history has nothing to suggest a connection to Argentina. Is this still a suitable target?
 * Move the edit history to Family Game (console) and retarget that to Nintendo Entertainment System hardware clone. Then disambiguate family game for the console, The Family Game, The Family Game (game show), and maybe WP:DABRLs like "Family-friendly board game, a category of board games". 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Dab per 59... above. Left alone, this redirect might cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Family Game Night
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 31%23Family Game Night

Turing Church
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 28%23Turing Church

Brongniartia (trilobite)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 28%23Brongniartia (trilobite)

Hemogram
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 28%23Hemogram

Hemogramme
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 28%23Hemogramme

Concept Software Ltd.
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Deryck C. 10:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Concept Software Ltd. → Level-5 Comcept (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concept_Software_Ltd.&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I found this in CAT:CSD, as it was tagged and would have deleted it under R3 if it were a new creation, but it's two years old. "Concept" doesn't appear in the target at all, except for the following line: The name "Comcept" is a combination of the words concept, and com, referring to the abbreviation of computer. I don't know if they're separate companies, but the etymology of Comcept makes it likely, and it's certain that the redirect isn't mentioned in the target article. Nyttend (talk) 02:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree that they are not the same company, and therefore this should be deleted to avoid confusion. Onel 5969  TT me 14:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that there is confusion between multiple companies here. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This never seems to have been the company's name or a plausible version thereof. Checking old versions of the official website prior to being bought by Level-5, it is always called comcept Inc. and 株式会社 comcept. Concept Software Limited on the other hand is a British company that predates Comcept by over a decade and does not claim a connection to Comcept, Level-5 or any company in Japan or the game industry. Reach Out to the Truth 21:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song))
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  carefully indeed. I've checked incoming internal links and can confirm that all remaining incoming links, as of the time of this deletion, pertain to this deletion discussion, so no further action is necessary. Deryck C. 10:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)) → Get Together (The Youngbloods song) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Get_Together_(Get_Together_(The_Youngbloods_song))&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect has a disambiguated title within a disambiguator. This exists because of a move by Anthony Appleyard to a mistaken title (see User talk:Anthony Appleyard), and that has since been fixed. It clearly does not make sense to have a disambiguator within another disambiguator. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete carefully. Obviously it's not a good title, but it has a dozen years of rather confusing history; it looks like people have repeatedly moved a redirect in this page's history, for reasons I don't understand.  Normally it doesn't matter if you ignore the page history when deleting a page, but the deleting admin needs to be careful to ensure that all of this page's previous titles are cared for and don't get pointed somewhere else by accident.  Nyttend (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete carefully. Is a good phrase from Nyttend.  And please note this is a rare occasion when I have a delete !vote (now accepting accolades).  At some point in history, obviously this was a typo that got incorporated into the sequence of re-namings. Make sure its elimination does not remove all the links to the correct article.  Check that no circular links pass through this typo. Trackinfo (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * For incoming links see Special:WhatLinksHere/Get Together (Get Together (TheYoungbloods song)). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per the redundant disambiguation. (I now want to go watch Inception.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.