Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 3

January 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 3, 2018.

New+Jersey coast
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as G6/G7 by   . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 16:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

I wanted to see whether or not New Jersey coast already existed, so I typed in "New_Jersey_coast" and seeing that it didn't exist, created it as a redirect to Jersey Shore. Unfortunately, I didn't realize that I had accidentally typed "New+Jersey coast" (plus instead of underscore) until after I had created the redirect, so I moved it to New Jersey coast. Unfortunately, it automatically created a redirect from New+Jersey coast to New Jersey coast. I want to know whether or not this falls under R3 or not because it's a plausible typo when typing in the URL bar but not when typing in the search bar. If consensus here is that R3 applies, I'll request the redirect for speedy deletion under R3 and G7 (because I'm the one who made the redirect). If consensus is that R3 or not because it's a plausible typo when typing in the URL bar but not when typing in the search bar. If consensus here is that R3 doesn't exist, then I won't request it for speedy deletion. I want to know whether or not this case falls under R3 or not before making my mind about whether or not it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Nth User (talk • contribs) 23:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * New+Jersey coast → Jersey Shore (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New%2BJersey_coast&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Though I have done this myself in the past, I would say it's not plausible for simplicity sake (we don't need a hundred "Two+Word" redirects). &#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  00:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Facebook worm
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Facebook malware. Facebook malware has since been created and retargeting there appears to be the most appropriate course of action at this time. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this close, please do leave me a message on my talk page (please be civil) and I will respond as soon as possible. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Facebook worm → Koobface (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facebook_worm&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A Facebook worm does not exclusively refer to Koobface, there are also ones like Dorkbot (malware). Note that Facebook malware and the like do not exist. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Could this be brought to or become a disambiguation page? Would that be appropriate?&#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  23:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, how about someone creates List of Facebook worms or Facebook malware or something like that, makes Facebook worms redirect to it, and and adds things like Koobface and Dorkbot (malware)? Maybe a category for all of the pages in the list, like Category:Facebook malware, should be created. The Nth User I have no ideas for what to put here. Care to differ or discuss? 00:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and created the article 'Facebook malware'. We can now retarget this redirect over to that. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Peter Whitehead (sport shooter)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Peter Whitehead (sport shooter) → Percy Whitehead (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Whitehead_(sport_shooter)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Propose deletion per WP:RFD #2 (i.e. potential confusion) - his first name was Percy, not Peter (and I couldn't find any evidence that he used "Peter" as a nickname). An example of potential confusion is that an editor recently re-added this redirect to the Peter Whitehead disambiguation page after it had previously been removed. DH85868993 (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Irish general election, 2017
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Irish general election, 2017 → Next Irish general election (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_general_election,_2017&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

There was no general election held in Ireland in 2017. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 21:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. That would be pretty misleading. &#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  23:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CityPoint (Brooklyn)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep.  Nomination withdrawn.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * CityPoint (Brooklyn) → City Point (Brooklyn) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CityPoint_(Brooklyn)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Building complex is not referred to as CityPoint. Neither are the other City Point (disambiguation) locations. The only one that is combined like that with the capital P is CityPoint in London. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn in light of articles provided below showing that this stylization is useful. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems harmless enough, R from modification. Someone must have thought this was the name, perhaps having their mind driven to camel case via its location on DeKalb Avenue. --BDD (talk) 20:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep As page creator, multiple sources (especially when it was new) called it and still call it "CityPoint", 1, 2, 3, etc. Yes, it's not the official name, but that doesn't mean people aren't often wrong. It's a common association like MetroCard and there are frequent mistakes made, like in NetFlix or DeBlasio, to ascribe camel case to obvious portmanteaux, even if incorrect -- like City Point, Netflix, and de Blasio. Doubt its cognitively derived from DeKalb, but it's common and needed. Unless the contention is that people confuse Brooklyn as being in London? JesseRafe (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jessee
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Indexify  . I'll relist if contested; but should be uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Jessee → Darren Jessee (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jessee&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

There are multiple people with the given name Jessee or family name Jessee. This shouldn't go to Darren Jessee as he is not a mononym or primary topic, but I could be wrong, hence the RFD. There is also a Jessee/Miller Field. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Indexify should be uncontroversial: we have multiple articles about people by this name, so a WP:APO index should exist at this lemma. Drafted below the redirect. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Klimaatverandering
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Involved close per WP:SNOW. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Klimaatverandering → Climate change (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Klimaatverandering&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete per Redirects from foreign languages. This is a clear attempt to undermine the explanatory statement(WP:RFOREIGN) to WP:R. Only created a few days ago and provides no obvious use to the Encyclopedia. &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  20:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Creation of this is obviously a pointy edit. Also it's not reasonable to expect the English language Wikipedia to have redirects for foreign languages. What next, do we need to add the French, German, Urdu, Tamil, Japanese, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, Greek, Italian, Polish, Russian, Serbian, Turkish, South African, Ukrainian, Esperanto and Klingon terms as redirects? <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 20:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is best read in the original Klingon. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - only used by a user wikilinking foreign terms in untranslated excerpts from references; the excerpts themselves should not be used in English-language articles as they are of no use to English readers. WP:RFD does not apply as it seems obvious the creator was doing so deliberately to make a point about the foreign-language redirects essay, and got themselves blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:POINTy. See also Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (permalink). --BDD (talk) 20:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Created as purely WP:POINTy disruption. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt, created to disrupt RFOREIGN as noted above. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete absolutely, at least unless someone demonstrates that the Dutch (or Afrikaners) invented climate change. Largoplazo (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It was, of course, the Chinese. --BDD (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ha! Largoplazo (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This was created only to enable the creation of even sillier redirects such as Emerico de Hungría (santo). Surtsicna (talk) 09:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Death of Pope Benedict XVI
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted  per G7. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 17:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Death of Pope Benedict XVI → Pope Benedict XVI (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_of_Pope_Benedict_XVI&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Death and state funeral of George H. W. Bush → George H. W. Bush (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_and_state_funeral_of_George_H._W._Bush&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These redirects are misleading as the subjects are still alive; no information about their future deaths is known. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There's nothing to be found at either target about the death of either figure and no reason why anyone would be looking up either of them, so this is just silly and pointless. Largoplazo (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (Though I will admit they are both slightly funny and disturbing, sheesh.) &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  21:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Isn't it a BLP violation to suggest the death of a living subject? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily, it could simply suggest the existence of encyclopedic information on a subject's future death. For example, there is already an article on the Death of Queen Elizabeth II. -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I just wonder if it's appropriate to prepare articles like that whenever someone orders like a coffin or reserves a burial site, or makes changes to their will / trust. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That's different. It redirects to an article about plans already in existence for someone's future death. It isn't redirecting to Elizabeth II. Largoplazo (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coronation of King Charles III
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted  per G7. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 17:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Coronation of King Charles III → Charles, Prince of Wales (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coronation_of_King_Charles_III&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Coronation of Charles III → Charles, Prince of Wales (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coronation_of_Charles_III&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. If he dies before his mother or he is passed over for whatever reason, he won't have a coronation. Additionally, there is no information about his potential coronation, so the redirect is misleading from that standpoint as well. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. I don't see a reason for Redirects like this to exist other than to just confuse the reader. Maybe this needs a Policy debate on RfC to update Speedy Delete criteria for redirects that violate WP:CRYSTAL for events that haven't happened yet. Thoughts? &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright, or retargeted to King Charles III (film). -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Excellent point, . Though, according to that article Charles does not have a coronation in the film as it seems he starts it as King of England. &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:CRYSTAL. Not just for him becoming king, but due to the (repeatedly speculated) possibility that he might choose to be known by something other than Charles III as king. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. His mother could outlive him. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as creator. Over zealous biographing, clear violation of WP:CRYSTAL. No Swan So Fine (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

William, Prince of Wales
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted  per G7. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 17:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * <span id="William, Prince of Wales">William, Prince of Wales → Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William,_Prince_of_Wales&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Coronation of King William V → Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coronation_of_King_William_V&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per WP:CRYSTAL. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 18:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Theoretically, these two events in his life c ould take place in thirty or forty years time, respectively; per nom. Unlikely search term.  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 18:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence he'll definitely get either title anytime soon. <b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b><b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b> (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * William, Prince of Wales seems a plausible variation on Prince William of Wales and William of Wales. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete both per WP:CRYSTAL. He's not Prince of Wales nor do we know if he'll ever be coronated as king. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as creator. Over zealous biographing, clear violation of WP:CRYSTAL. No Swan So Fine (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
 * Followup note
 * Shouldn't Prince William of Wales and William of Wales also get RfD'ed for exactly the same reason?  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ &gt;ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ&lt;  08:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, not G7 obviously, but... ah, heck, if there was ever a case for WP:IAR... Actually, I'm not going to delete them - Prince William of Wales is linked all over the place.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * But William of Wales wasn't, so he's gone. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * See Prince William, Duke of Cambridge. Before marriage, William was "Prince William of Wales". William of Wales seems to me to be a plausible variant of that, so I'd at least like to see an RfD if that one is to be deleted. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, restored. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

OUYA 2
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * OUYA 2 → Ouya (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OUYA_2&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Ouya 2 → Ouya (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ouya_2&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not in target article. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 18:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as useless. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I do agree that the OUYA is useless, but I fail to see what you mean there. Is it that there is no point to the Redirect?&#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL as above.&#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Virtual nation
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Micronation. (non-admin closure)  Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  16:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Virtual nation → Fictional country (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virtual_nation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I found this redirect after someone had blanked it, with the edit summary "Virtual nation is not the same as fictional country." Though blanking wasn't the appropriate way to address that (and I've restored the redirect), I agree with that comment. While that isn't dispositive—synonymy is hardly the only grounds for redirection—the term "virtual" doesn't appear in the redirect target, fictional country, and "virtual nation" implies to me something like an online community that simulates the operation of a country, which is completely different from anything covered at the redirect target. Therefore, I consider the current redirect to be inaccurate and misleading, decidedly unhelpful. I also don't know of an obvious place to point it at, so maybe it should be deleted. Largoplazo (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment sorta covered at micronation, specifically Micronation. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice, that seems reasonable. I endorse that. Largoplazo (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LAG Manufacturing Company
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete  per G7. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 22:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * LAG Manufacturing Company → LAG Motorcoach (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LAG_Manufacturing_Company&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I just created this, but in retrospect, solution should be: This should be title of article, the target should be the redirect. I can rename target when this is removed. Current main article (target of this redirect) is named after a division, not the main company. Doprendek (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. WP:G7, redirect meets criteria for speedy deletion. &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Paging User Tavix, Paging User Tavix. &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  22:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bristol park & ride
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G5.  -- Tavix  ( talk ) 15:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * <span id="Bristol park & ride">Bristol park & ride → Bristol park and ride (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bristol_park_%26_ride&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Created by a blocked sock. Unlikely search term with and ampersand in the title, users searching for redirect target would probably use full term rather than shorthand Night  fury  15:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

橋彼道
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep.  --BDD (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * <span id="橋彼道">橋彼道 → Qupital (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%A9%8B%E5%BD%BC%E9%81%93&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A redirect name in Chinese.  333-blue  14:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:RFOREIGN, chinese name of Hong Kong company is an appropriate foreign language redirect. --Brustopher (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Redirects from relevant languages are normal and desirable. There's even a redirect template for them, r from alt lang. Largoplazo (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per WP:FORRED and above. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Psychogenesis
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete  as deletion was not suggested.  I guess you can do what you like with it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Psychogenesis → Psychology (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psychogenesis&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target, so the reader who searches for this looking for a definition is left none the wiser. I think this either ought to be a soft redirect to Wiktionary (which has the definition), or the unsourced stub previously at this location ought to be restored. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 13:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Microsoft Phone
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was disambiguate  . Based on the arguments provided, creation of a disambiguation page appears to be the be appropriate, Within that page it will contain links to all wiki-linked articles within this discussion. If you have any questions are concerns regarding this close, please do let me know by leaving a message on my talk page (please be civil) and I will get back to you as soon as I can. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Microsoft Phone → Microsoft Kin (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Phone&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A UWP app of this name exists (https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/store/p/microsoft-phone/9wzdncrdtbwp). Less importantly, this title may be confused with Windows Phone if someone is searching for a Wikipedia article on a Microsoft-brand phone. – Batreeq ( Talk ) (Contribs) 20:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to Windows Phone as a R from incorrect name. Steel1943  (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as ambiguous, could also refer to Microsoft Mobile, Windows Mobile etc. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 05:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Windows Phone. Users might be looking for Microsoft's phone. &#8213; <em style="color:black">Matthew J. Long -Talk-<sup style="font-size:75%">☖  21:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Celestial bureaucracy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 11%23Celestial bureaucracy

LEGO movie (trash)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  per WP:SNOW. This was clearly meant to be temporary (it looks like the page creator was attempting a round robin page move), so it wouldn't be a stretch to call this housekeeping. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 21:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * <span id="LEGO movie (trash)">LEGO movie (trash) → Brickfilm (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LEGO_movie_(trash)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was created way back in 2005 by a new editor apparently trying to delete a redirect after Brickfilm was moved. It doesn't seem to have any reason to exist. Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete seems like a useless search term and page. --Treetear (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlikely search term. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  04:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Just can't see how this might be helpful. Pichpich (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as housekeeping cleanup of a temporary file. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.