Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 6

January 6
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 6, 2018.

Australian Politicians with Doctorates
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Killiondude (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Australian Politicians with Doctorates → Politics of Australia (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Politicians_with_Doctorates&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

no idea what this is meant to be Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see any reason to keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not mentioned in the article. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JALIA
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * JALIA → Australian Library and Information Association (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JALIA&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect doesn't make sense, we already have the ALIA redirect.  333-blue  09:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is the abbreviation for the journal of that organisation, which is briefly mentioned in the article. – Uanfala (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Uanfala (talk) -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Christmas in the United States
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 18%23Christmas in the United States

Political usages of the term evil
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Political usages of the term evil → Good and evil (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_usages_of_the_term_evil&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was merged to Evil and redirected, but the merged content was removed in 2010. Peter James (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - What the redirect is talking about appears to be covered in the section Good_and_evil more broadly. However, there's still the problem that the redirect seems to imply some kind of a list or notable collection of political figures and ideas labeled "evil", which the article doesn't (and shouldn't) have. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I feel the same way as CoffeeWithMarkets. The article kind of sort of has the information the redirect is referring to, but I'm not convinced that it's enough to make someone using the redirect satisfied. -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Threadripper
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 13%23Threadripper