Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 5

May 5
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 5, 2018.

Fucking anal
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 20:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Fucking anal → Anal sex (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fucking_anal&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

It's oddly worded: people may refer to anal sex as "fucking anally" or "anal fucking," but I've never heard the phrase "fucking anal," and we don't have a similar redirect for "fucking oral" to oral sex (not that I believe any of those should be created as redirects). I think the biggest reason to delete is that is is only one letter off from the movie title Fucking Amal, which could cause embarrassment if people were looking up a (non-pornographic) movie and accidentally went to a page on anal sex. Raymond1922 (talk) 00:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete You can call someone "fucking anal", meaning that they are very anal retentive, so maybe it could redirect to that. I can't imagine anyone searching for anal sex looking for our article on anal sex with the phrase. Doug Weller  talk 07:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think redirecting it to anal retentive is a good idea. "Fucking" can be used for emphasis in countless contexts, but none of these are worthy of redirects. Raymond1922 (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No such media title and hinders search for the film. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking at the redirects to anal sex, many of them are questionable, like anial sex, ANAL SEX, anal secks/anal seks/analsecks, ass full of knife, pedicare (apparently Latin), marmango and marmango dance, shit fuck (sounds more like what you'd say when stubbing your toe), taking it up the arse, Unprotected Anal (with a capital A), anal virginity (redirects to a non-existent section), and so on. Raymond1922 (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Without going too far into WP:OTHERSTUFF. ANAL SEX is clearly appropriate as a, some of the others might be appropriate . Pedicare though I am about to nominate. Thryduulf (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Morechella bispora
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 00:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Morechella bispora → Verpa bohemica (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morechella_bispora&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Seems to be typo for "Morchella ...", but also no mention of anything "... bispora" at target article. No evidence that this is a useful redirect. Pam D  09:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

You're right, I've made a typo, it should be spelled Morchella. I don't see how to rename a page, can you do this for me? It was for the biography of the first person to discover it in Canada, Alfred Brooker Klugh, https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Klugh-50. I took the term from the book "Essays on the Early History of Plant Pathology and Mycology in Canada", 1994, by Ralph H Estey, page 264, https://books.google.fr/books?id=_tstGOViLLsC&pg=PA264. MycoBank gives it as a synonym for Verpa bohemica, http://www.mycobank.org/BioloMICS.aspx?TableKey=14682616000000067&Rec=232007. PhilipBroughtonMills (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: procedural relist, redirect was not tagged for most of the discussion due to a move.
 * This typo version should still be deleted: I've moved the redirect to the correct spelling, which does not need to be deleted. Am discussing with PBM above about getting it mentioned in the target article. Pam  D  10:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete this redirect which is now R from move and not required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've reverted 's move of the redirect because it caused the RfD tag to be moved to Morchella bispora instead of Morechella bispora. The tag is now back at the correct location. Please do not move redirects like this—the proper course of action would be to simply create the correctly titled redirect. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as Morchella bispora has already been created per above. --Qetuth (talk) 09:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emma Duncan
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Not opposed to a dab being created, but as there are no actual Emma Duncan articles, the WP:REDLINK wins out. ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 01:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Emma Duncan → The Economist (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Duncan&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The subject is not mentioned anywhere in The Economist, misleading given that there are multiple Emma Duncans. czar 22:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete; it appears she does still work at the Economist but clearly not in a way that warrants a mention in enough detail to satisfy any search for the name. Clearly a common name, so this redirect generally helps nobody. ~ mazca  talk 23:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - there are other Emma Duncans that may be closer to notability --Qetuth (talk) 11:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak dabify, mentioned in 1843 (magazine)/ Intelligent Life magazine, also author Breaking the Curfew, about the 1970s operation in Balochistan  multiple wikipedia articles have references to her, but not sure if her journalist entry is notable enough to be resurrected. There's also Emma Duncan who was a winner on The Biggest Loser Australia: Families; Canadian actress in Mixed Blessings; USS Hastings (1860) ship known as the Emma Duncan; Emma Duncan Crocker wife of Arthur Sewall; Emma Duncan New York actress in The Bridges of Madison County (musical); Emma Duncan swimmer on the relay teams for 2012 Australian Swimming Championships and 2013 Australian Swimming Championships; Emma Duncan, producer of A Quiet Word With ... Of these the ship one, Biggest Loser, and 1843 are good candidates to stay on a dab page.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine to recreate if/when those exist with enough sourcing, but right now none of them do? czar  10:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Khangate
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 20:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Khangate → Justin Trudeau (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khangate&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Possible BLP violation, not mention in either his article or the article on his premiership Doug Weller  talk 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * "In January 2017, Canada's Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson, began an investigation into Trudeau for a vacation he and his family took to Aga Khan IV's private island in the Bahamas.[185][186] The Ethics Commissioner's report, released in December 2017, found that Trudeau had violated four provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act.[187]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbq430 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks, that's my point. No mention of Khangate. If we had such a redirect, it would probably go to something like Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 on the basis of sources such as (The Daily Caller, a conservative news source, etc. but I'm not suggesting that.  Doug Weller  talk 11:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Google is showing extremely few results, most to the Daily Caller to the phrase. Not enough there to even justify that it has a wide enough usage to be a broad search term that could indirectly reference the above section. --M asem (t) 13:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I couldn't find evidence that this was more than one journalists failed attempt to come up with a hashtag. My search found just as many (external) hits for an event involving Bush as it did for Trudeau, and slightly more for the Trump Khangate. Doesn't look like the term got wide acceptance or recognition for any of the three Khangates so far. Note though that the term appears in two "lists of scandals" here (both unsourced) making Wikipedia the biggest single user of the term. --Qetuth (talk) 09:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm only seeing not-so-mainstream news sites like The Daily Caller. Otherwise it's about people named Khan gate-crashing events, or physical gates like Ghulam Khan Gate or Amanulla Khan Gate AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete it seems like this term simply never caught on.--65.94.254.248 (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Tpv5-n and others
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 20:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Template:Tpv5-n → Template:Uw-vblock (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Tpv5-n&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Tpv5 → Template:Uw-vblock (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Tpv5&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Test7 → Template:Uw-voablock (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Test7&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Test6 → Template:Uw-vblock (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Test6&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Vw8 → Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vw8&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Vw7 → Template:Uw-blockindef (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vw7&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Vw6 → Template:Uw-blocknotalk (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vw6&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Vw5 → Template:Uw-block (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Vw5&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Test5 → Template:Uw-block (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Test5&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Uw-test5 → Template:Uw-block (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-test5&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Uw-vandalism5.5 → Template:Uw-recentblockwarn (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-vandalism5.5&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Uw-vandalism8 → Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-vandalism8&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:Uw-vandalism7 → Template:Uw-blockindef (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-vandalism7&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible redirects. Septrillion (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep all - see WP:VW for an explanation of these redirects. PhilKnight (talk) 22:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep all per PhilKnight, not implausible at all. Thryduulf (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cross namespace
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . We should not redirect a page and then nominate it at RfD as if that has been the target.  That being said, these do seem made in error-ish, and there is some desire to delete, so taking it as good-faith delete that, even for their original targets, we'd still be here.  Happy to undo if there is disagreement. ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 00:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Category women inventors → Category:Women inventors (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_women_inventors&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Category German football forward, 1990s birth stubs → Category:German football forward, 1990s birth stubs (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_German_football_forward,_1990s_birth_stubs&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Category Mandy Moore → Category:Mandy Moore (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_Mandy_Moore&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Category West Midlands → Category:West Midlands (county) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_West_Midlands&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No reason for these cross-namespace redirects UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've speedily deleted (WP:CSD) the football stubs one as the history shows that was unequivocally created in error in the wrong namespace and the redirect resulted from it being fixed. I'm still thinking about the other two, but they were not clearly created in error and so speedy deletion does not apply. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all 3 (remaining). I can't think of a reason these redirects could be useful. --Qetuth (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Holcomb C3-R
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Unopposed. C3-R is relevant, but Holcomb was never present in the target. ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 01:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Holcomb C3-R → Corneal collagen cross-linking (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holcomb_C3-R&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

brand name, not mentioned in linked article.  DGG ( talk ) 16:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Danger opportunity
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted  per G7 by . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 13:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Danger opportunity → Chinese word for "crisis" (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danger_opportunity&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This phrase is ambiguous in nature and could describe forms of risk. To redirect it to an article about a foreign language translation could be seen as a WP:SURPRISE and also forces readers to go to a specific article when Wikipedia's search function could provide readers better assistance. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I wanted to replace Danger opportunity Chinese word below. You may delete it. – Laundry Pizza 03  ( d c&#x0304; ) 03:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Antimaterials
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 20:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Antilithium → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antilithium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antiberyllium → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antiberyllium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antiboron → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antiboron&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Anticarbon → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anticarbon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antinitrogen → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antinitrogen&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antioxygen → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antioxygen&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antifluorine → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antifluorine&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antineon → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antineon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antisodium → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antisodium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antimagnesium → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antimagnesium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antialuminum → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antialuminum&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antisilicon → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antisilicon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antiphosphorus → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antiphosphorus&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antisulfur → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antisulfur&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antichlorine → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antichlorine&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Antiwater → Antimatter (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antiwater&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Undiscovered antimaterials, not notable. Might as well have these for every material documented on Wikipedia... – Laundry Pizza 03  ( d c&#x0304; ) 08:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Antiberyllium and all heavier species, as current science doesn't even conceive of a method to synthesize these elements in a stable form (we can't even make positive-matter beryllium). Also delete Antilithium, as it hasn't been synthesized yet. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 15:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Created en masse by back in 2016 without any justifications except for Antiwater which was created back in March by another editor. Not used in any reliable sources or discussed in the article. They won't be missed.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I think we know where this is heading, but none of these were appropriately tagged, so in the interest of procedure, I'm relisting them. I've tagged them all.
 * Delete all as exceptionally unlikely search terms. As has been stated above, it's just within reach to synthesize antiparticles, but the anti-elements listed here are far off. <em style="font:bold 12px Verdana;"> Richard 0612  23:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 12:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Synthesised or not, there appears to be significant sources speculating about the creation and properties of (some of) these antimaterials - A search for Anticarbon for example gets all sorts of interesting articles, and is conceivably something an intersted reader might head to Wikipedia to learn more about. On the other hand, some of these terms are primarily used to mean "absense of -" not "antimatter version of -", particularly Antichlorine, making that particular redirect inappropriate. --Qetuth (talk) 10:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 *  Keep  Lithium through Nitrogen, plus Water, as currently discussed topics in science media and hence plausible search terms.
 * Delete or Change target for Oxygen and Chlorine, maybe Sodium and Sulphur also, as antimatter is not the only/primary meaning.
 * Delete other elements as too soon. --Qetuth (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you mind sharing some examples of where those forms of antimatter are "currently discussed topics in science media"? My own understanding is that synthesis of antiberyllium (and hence all heavier antimatter elements) is generally considered impossible. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies, it seems I messed up my googling on these. On reading closer the articles I'd found, most were primarily about antihydrogen and mentioned others only in passing such as in this Slate article. Several were copies or coverage of Gerald Jacksons work, such as this, which seems more fringy today than it did last night (I think I was fooled by talks he did being hosted at .edu domains?). What remains is many quora / yahoo answers questions and article / forum comments, which show only that these may be plausible search terms by the curious. --Qetuth (talk) 02:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Antioxygen might be confused with antioxidant AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - "Antiwater" appears to be an exact match for at least one commercial product, and I'd think that there would be multiple others. I'm also wondering if it might get people confused with the fictional substance ice-nine. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kevinism
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to German Kevinism. ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 01:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Kevinism → Kevin Rudd (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevinism&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Expression is not mentioned in the target article, this page should be deleted. WWGB (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - why not Kevin Roberts on the basis of this Guardian article or German Kevinism (see also Strange German Disease Called "Kevinism": Can a Lame Name Mess Up Your Life?. Or even The Leftovers (TV series) based on which seems more likely but again, I'm not suggesting it. The only realistic redirect is probably German Kevinism, and I'd suggest changing it to that. Doug Weller  talk 11:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to German Kevinism as the only notable use of the word. "Ruddism" seems more common than "Kevinism" to describe Kevin Rudd anyway. --Qetuth (talk) 10:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CCAV
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 15%23CCAV

AJ-100
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Killiondude (talk) 06:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * AJ-100 → Architects' Journal (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AJ-100&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target. The SandDoctor Talk 01:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or mention. This refers to the "Architects' Journal list of 100 best UK practices", and seems to be regarded as a fairly prestigious thing so it would definitely be appropriate to mention it in the article. However the only places I can see a reference currently is at PDP London and Page\Park Architects, two architecture firms that have won the award, but neither is a suitable place to retarget to. Thryduulf (talk) 11:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - The journal itself appears notable, but I'm wary of getting into minute details of the publication's projects. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.