Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 4

November 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 4, 2018.

1,2-dimethyl-benzene (ortho-xylene)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Unopposed ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 19:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * 1,2-dimethyl-benzene (ortho-xylene) → Xylene (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1,2-dimethyl-benzene_(ortho-xylene)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely specific search term (compound of synonyms, each of which alone gets to a more correct target anyway). DMacks (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:List of Arrowverse episodes
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 19:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * [[Category:List of Arrowverse episodes]] → Category:Lists of Arrowverse episodes (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:List_of_Arrowverse_episodes&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

misnamed category... should have been "Lists of..." to start Joeyconnick (talk) 06:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, but only after the full seven days here. It was only at this title for a few days and there is no significant history to it. Waiting a while between moving the category and nominating it here would have been ideal, but as long as we give it the full seven days that should be plenty of time for everyone to become aware. Thryduulf (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

00s (century)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus  . ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 19:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * 00s (century) → 1st century (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=00s_(century)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely redirect / search term. Probably intended to redirect to first century, but even so is not really in use (who is going to look for 00s (century), with the disambig, if they want the first century?) Fram (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - the first two usages (in terms of years) retuned in a search of the wiki are Absolute Radio 00s, & Now That's What I Call the 00s. A mere 2000 years off target. Cabayi (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 00s. As mentioned at the page, 00s can refer to both the 1st century, and centuries in general. JZCL 21:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It seems to me counterintuitive that anyone would search for this, but with the parenthetical disambiguation it isn't really ambiguous and couldn't refer to anything other than the current target. In the highly unlikely event that someone's searching for centuries in general and is using this mystifying search term to do so, century is the first link in the first line of the target so it's no harder to find than if this were to point to the dab page. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 01:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep per Arms & Hearts. --BDD (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I've never heard of 00s being referred to as 1st century AD. It's the same with the fact that calling 2000s century as "20th century" is incorrect. --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 01:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Way (New Horizon)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 19:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * <span id="The Way (New Horizon)">The Way (New Horizon) → Housefires (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Way_(New_Horizon)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention of The Way (New Horizon) on target page and unable to find a more suitable target. Richhoncho (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This was unopposed here, but the creator removed the RfD tag almost immediately so 1. That's opposition and 2. this hasn't been properly tagged. So relisting either way.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 01:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not mentioned in the target or any other article. This seems to be a song on Housefires' album We Say Yes, the article for which would be an appropriate target if it existed, but as the album doesn't have an article there's no suitable target for this. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.