Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 18

April 18
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 18, 2019.

The Greatest Hits (Boney M. album)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23The Greatest Hits (Boney M. album)

James Silcox
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23James Silcox

Portal:Queen Elizabeth II
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Portal:Queen Elizabeth II → Elizabeth II (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Queen_Elizabeth_II&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Pointless WP:Cross-namespace redirect. If we created redirects to mainspace from possible portalspace searches, we could have billions of them. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, with precedent at Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 2, etc. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:35, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: useless WP:CROSS.   SITH   (talk)   12:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CP(
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23CP(

Psionic storm
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Psionic storm

Lightwhip
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Lightwhip

Psionic Spirit Blade
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Psionic Spirit Blade

Star Wars lightsaber redirects
 Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Star Wars lightsaber redirects

High General
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23High General

Gargantuan (Battle Platform)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Gargantuan (Battle Platform)

Heavy Missile Platform
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Heavy Missile Platform

Star Wars vehicle redirects
       Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26%23Star Wars vehicle redirects

Conduction block
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Nerve block. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Conduction block → Heart block (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conduction_block&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - conduction block is not exclusive for heart block. It can also refer to block of nerve conduction in other tissues (examples ) Coming from the link in Neuromuscular-blocking_drug, current redirection confuses the reader. ycanerol 16:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nerve block - don't see why that wasn't just done in the first place. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Disambig could refer to nerve, heart and possibly more. I don't think there's a clear primary target here; would lean towards heart if had to choose. --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 01:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Hope more user comment on it

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nerve block and add a for...see... hatnote at Heart block. A quick search suggests that many medical sources treat "conduction block" as describing a nerve disorder, with the heart problem referred to as "heart block". However this is not universal and some do (technically also correctly) refer to heart blocks as conduction blocks. The practicalities of WP:COMMONNAME in these awkward situations then dictated my vote. Certainly, heavy-handed deletion is quite the wrong thing to do with such a common medical term. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"John"
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 25%23"John"

Dunne D.10
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Nominator withdrawn  . (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Dunne D.10 → Dunne D.8 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunne_D.10&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete to encourage article creation. D.10 is not mentioned at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I have now added it to the target and given a reference. A standalone article is unlikely, as so little is known about it. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. To clarify my vote. Very, very little about the D.10 is to be found in RS and even that is not wholly consistent. It is generally treated as a variant of the D.8 and so no standalone article is ever likely to be created for it. It is now mentioned accordingly in the Dunne D.8 target page, and cited. Perhaps I should declare an interest here: I have studied Dunne's original papers and I can confirm that this situation is unlikely to change. If it does by some miracle, then that miracle will also ensure that no encouragement will be needed to convert the redirect into a standalone article. The rationale put forward for this RfD is both misplaced and obsolete and any burden for further discussion lies with those who would delete a useful redirect. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to withdraw the nomination given this explanation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 25%23Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana