Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 7

April 7
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 7, 2019.

List of People whose name is Ichiro
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * List of People whose name is Ichiro → Ichirō (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_People_whose_name_is_Ichiro&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unnecessary. We already have Ichiro for non-diacritics purpose. No other redirects starting with "List of people whose name is" exists. Either we mass-create those, or we delete this one. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete since it's also miscapitalized. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 06:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brexit means Brexit does mean Brexit
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Brexit means Brexit does mean Brexit → Brexit (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brexit_means_Brexit_does_mean_Brexit&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I do not believe this redirect should exist. If you believe there is a valid reason for keeping this redirect, please let me know. If you see any redirects here that you think should be deleted, go ahead and nominate them. Mstrojny (talk) 21:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Brexit means Brexit is a plausible search term, but this is not. Thryduulf (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with Thryduulf. Doesn't appear to be a valid search term. Onel 5969  TT me 12:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey Girl (Justin Bieber song) → Believe (Justin Bieber album) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hey_Girl_(Justin_Bieber_song)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention of this song at target or at Justin Bieber discography. Another rumoured track? Richhoncho (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unreleased 2014 track, so it is a plausible search term but it’s not mentioned at target article.— N Ø  09:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Forever Lost (Album)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Forever Lost (album). —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Forever Lost (Album) → The Magic Numbers (album) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forever_Lost_(Album)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention of an album of this name on target (there is a song, which also has a redirect). Richhoncho (talk) 10:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Forever Lost (album) for obvious reasons.-- N Ø  16:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Retarget per MaranoFan. Thryduulf (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:British Overseas Territories
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete  . (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Portal:British Overseas Territories → British Overseas Territories (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:British_Overseas_Territories&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Now unnecessary and a surprise. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:British Overseas Territories Legacypac (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The MfD closed with explicit consensus to redirect and there is no reason to change that. Thryduulf (talk) 09:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The redirect is misleading because it implies a portal where there is not one. Also note precedent at Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 2. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous consensus and stop forum shopping. Smartyllama (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The MfD was a year ago before the portal cleanup. Look at the fantastic comment by the creator. . How is this forum shopping a long time later? Legacypac (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Palace of Westminster/images
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Palace of Westminster/images">Palace of Westminster/images → Palace of Westminster (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Palace_of_Westminster/images&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Seems unnecessary, there is no section talking about the images B dash (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom, doesn't appear to be a valid target. If there were a gallery section, it could direct there, but there isn't.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 15:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment this was originally created in 2004 as an image gallery, then moved or redirected to List of images/Places/Europe/United Kingdom/Cities/London/Palace of Westminster a few days later. In 2006 the redirect target was changed to the present target to avoid a cross-namespace redirect. In 2007 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of images deleted this and other galleries as now redundant to Commons. Thryduulf (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Inert munition
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Inert munition → Dummy round (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inert_munition&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Dummy round describes only one type of "inert munition". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Inert bomb
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Inert bomb → Dummy round (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inert_bomb&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The target does not describe an "inert bomb". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pincushion flower
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Pincushion (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Pincushion flower → Pincushion (disambiguation) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pincushion_flower&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Pincushion-flower → Scabiosa (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pincushion-flower&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Retarget somewhere. I discovered this situation by accident after seeing an off-wiki reference to "pincushion flower". I can't envision a reason why these two should go to separate places, but as I've never heard this term, I don't want to be WP:BOLD here. I thought of six other forms of the name, but they're all redlinks: Pincushion-flowers, Pincushion flowers, Pincushion Flower, Pincushion Flowers, Pincushion-Flower, and Pincushion Flowers. Nyttend (talk) 18:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Both should go to either the existing Pincushion (disambiguation), or to a new SIA for flowers known by this name, however punctuated. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pincushion (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:Music of Trinidad and Tobago/Related Trinidad and Tobago portals
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was housekeeping that's now taken care of  . The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 21:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Portal:Music of Trinidad and Tobago/Related Trinidad and Tobago portals">Portal:Music of Trinidad and Tobago/Related Trinidad and Tobago portals → Portal:Trinidad and Tobago/Related portals (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Music_of_Trinidad_and_Tobago/Related_Trinidad_and_Tobago_portals&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This has only ever been a redirect to Portal:Trinidad_and_Tobago/Related_portals which causes the weird idea that Portal:Cuba and other country/island specific portals are related to Music in Trinidad and Tobago. There is no other appropriate target. If someone was maintaining the parent portal page they might populate the page with links to some other portals, though other then the country portal I don't know what those would be. Legacypac (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I don't understand what the issue with this? It's apparently being used to transclude a list of portals related to Trinidad and Tobago, which seems equally relevant to a the list of portals related to music above it. In other words this seems to be both in use and harmless. If it were claiming to be portals related to the music of Trinidad and Tobago then you might have a point, but it doesn't. Thryduulf (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC) Only obstruction as Intry to fix the portal. Page is a strange artifact that does nothing useful. I'm blanking it and removing it from the portal. This is housekeeping. Just close this discussion. Legacypac (talk) 08:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chainmail bikini
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Bikini in popular culture. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Chainmail bikini → Gender representation in video games (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chainmail_bikini&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Chainmail Bikini → Bikini in popular culture (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chainmail_Bikini&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

See concern raised by at Talk:Gender representation in video games. I agree that it's a women's issue reaching beyond the scope of video games, though the Gender representation in video games article currently contains more information on the topic. feminist (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Bikini armor and the "scalemail bikini" link from Bikini in popular culture both go to Gender representation in video games. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It would be good to have a wider target than just video games, since this really this is something present across pop culture in general, not just videogames. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - I think the target should be the more comprehensive topic, which currently is Gender representation in video games, barely. If there are examples of this type of garment in media other than video games, it would be best to create an article about it (or add/expand on a section in an existing article, such as Bikini in popular culture (note, this anchor does not currently exist in the article)). Until then it makes sense to keep (and retarget in the case of Chainmail Bikini)) the redirect for both terms to the place where the most information about the topic is located, which as I understand it is (marginally) Gender representation in video games. There is a mention of scalemail bikinis in Bikini in popular culture about a niche magazine cover, but that looks like the only mention in the article about think kind of garment. There is nothing about the use of the term in relation to video games other than the scalemail term, which is piped to the same section in Gender representation in video games. The best solution would be to expand on the concept in the pop culture article (and it shouldn't be all that difficult if it is as prevelant as says), but until then I think the target should be the video game article. Regardless of outcome, both links should point to the same target. - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 22:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC) NB- scale armour bikini, scalemail bikini, and Scalemail Bikini should also target whatever both Chainmail Bikini and chainmail bikini end up targeting... - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 22:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Let's have one more chance on it

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bikini in popular culture#Bikini icons. This is a major trope in fantasy fiction and predates video games with resolution sufficient to depict a chain mail bikini. Chain mail bikinis show up on covers of fantasy novels, comics, and instruction manuals of pen and paper role playing games. Tvtropes has a list of examples (though not exclusively chain mail bikinis; it covers other types of revealing armor as well). Plantdrew (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Destruction Duet
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Nothing needing saving ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 13:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Destruction Duet → Mario Party 2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Destruction_Duet&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the targeted article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking at Articles for deletion/Destruction Duet it was closed as merge in 2005 though I’m not sure if we should be held to that since none of the 65 minigames are currently mentioned in the article.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 01:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not mentioned at target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.