Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 19

June 19
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 19, 2019.

Microloxia chlorissoides
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Microloxia chlorissoides → Microloxia (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microloxia_chlorissoides&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Please delete this redirect. It is a redirect from one species name to a genus name. We have no content about the species and it would be better for this to remain a redlink. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 21:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, better to have as a redlink than as a redirect. 16:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plantdrew (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Radioactive polonium
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Isotopes of polonium. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Radioactive polonium → Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radioactive_polonium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Polonium is by definition radioactive; no need to mention it again in the title. I recommend deletion for this reason, though if it is kept, it should redirect to polonium, as that is a more appropriate primary topic. ComplexRational (talk) 20:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What about Isotopes of polonium? It's a better target than the poisoning incident certainly, but I do appreciate the point that all polonium is radioactive. I'm only looking around because I think generally, redirecting "[Adjective] Foo" to "Foo" is unhelpful, since a user will basically always know they can search "Foo" directly. --BDD (talk) 21:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That is true; isotopes of polonium is a possibility as well (though to me, the adjective still feels redundant). ComplexRational (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It's only redundant if you know your chemistry. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete All isotopes of polonium are radioactive. Therefore, this is tautological and redundant. – Laundry Pizza 03  ( d c&#x0304; ) 12:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Isotopes of polonium. The adjective is only redundant if the reader is familiar with polonium. I found several recent news items that use the phrase: Financial Times, Polygraph, Down to Earth, The Guardian, and South China Morning Post. I think it's a valid search term. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Isotopes of polonium per Argento Surfer and the links they provide. The use of the phrase in those sources implies that there are non-radioactive types of polonium meaning a reader wanting to find information about the radioactive varieties would plausibly search for the full phrase. Thryduulf (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Genève Aeroport
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Genève Aeroport → Geneva Airport (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gen%C3%A8ve_Aeroport&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is a not useful misspelling. Either it is Genève-Aéroport and referring to the official French stop name of the the Geneva Airport railway station, or then it is Aéroport de Genève and refers indeed to Geneva Airport. ZH8000 (talk) 18:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I don't think omitting a diacritic is really a misspelling, though it's weird to do so when you use a diacritic elsewhere in the search term. This goes where I would expect it to in an English encyclopedia. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Additional side note: This redirect is neither linked by any article, nor was it visited by any user (page views is 0 for the last 30 days). -- ZH8000 (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually 0 is so low as to be suspicious to me, but it looks like there was 1 view so far in 2019 prior to this nomination. That does make me even less confident. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per BDD. Omitting one of two diacritics is certainly a very plausible spelling error for someone who isn't fluent in French. The redirect is unambiguous and has been around for 10 years, so there is at least a slight benefit and no harm in keeping it while we would gain nothing from deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hawkeye (DC Comics)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hawkeye (DC Comics) → List of Batman (TV series) characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hawkeye_(DC_Comics)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete - subject not mentioned at the target article. The section that used to refer to it was removed 20 November 2012. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spice rack
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 17:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Spice rack → Spice (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spice_rack&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

WP:REDLINK. I think this is probably worth an article, but either way, there's no discussion at the target article of spice racks or storage of spices otherwise. BDD (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, better to have as a red link than as a redirect. Plantdrew (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:REDLINK. There is also a record label by this name that is mentioned in a few articles, but that doesn't have an article either (and I've not looked to see if it is notable). Thryduulf (talk) 19:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Adhurs Raghu
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 30%23Adhurs Raghu

Petdam Gaiyanghadao
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 30%23Petdam Gaiyanghadao

Tseries
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget.  --BDD (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Tseries → T-Series (company) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tseries&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Retarget to T series (the disambiguation page) as an ambiguous search term. I don't see why this should target the company specifically. Geolodus (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Challenge 3
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 17:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Challenge 3 → Dev (actor) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Challenge_3&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention in the target, although Dev appears to have starred in Challenge and Challenge 2. If kept, I think that redirecting to Challenge is likely more appropriate. signed,Rosguill talk 17:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete unless we can identify any topics referred to as "Challenge 3". Of topics listed on the disambiguation page, only Challenge International de Tourisme 1932 looks to have a case, albeit a weak one. Also, while the two film articles contradict each other, the overall point seems to be that Challenge 2 was just a repackaging of an unrelated film. --BDD (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Difference equation
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 26%23Difference equation

Surat Tennis Club
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Surat Tennis Club → Surat (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surat_Tennis_Club&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Surat Football Club → Surat (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surat_Football_Club&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Redirects created in an attempt to appear notable, redirects to city they exist in, nothing else. Ajf773 (talk) 08:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * There's a Surat Thani F.C. in Surat Thani, Thailand. Surat Thani is listed at Surat (disambiguation), suggesting the city can be called "Surat" alone, but that seems tenuous. There's also a Surat Thani City F.C. and Surat Thani United F.C. All search results I'm seeing concern the Thai teams. --BDD (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Surat is in India so they are no plausable redirects. Ajf773 (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 15:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.