Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 23

June 23
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 23, 2019.

Eurasian race groups
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 1%23Eurasian race groups

Meet the spartans 2
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was soft delete  . The discussion expounded the circumstances surrounding this title and there is no stated opposition to the request for deletion. Deryck C. 11:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Meet the spartans 2 → Disaster Movie (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meet_the_spartans_2&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete Besides both being spoof movies by the same directors, these two movies have no connection. The characters are completely different, at the top of that the location is completely different as well. This is not a sequel to meet the spartans in the slightest. Sure both movies are part of the same spoof movie series, but my point stands. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 * A Google search suggests that this was an early working title for the film, though I can't confirm this with any reliable sources. PC78 (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, if there are no OFFICIAL sources that confirm that, it's nothing more than a rumor or speculation. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Derpy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 1%23Derpy

The Confrontation (2011 film)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 1%23The Confrontation (2011 film)

+ vc
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Deryck C. 11:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * + vc → Rede Globo (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%2B_vc&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete Does not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. While searching for this is tricky as google ignores the + whatever you do, the only results I'm finding for "+ vc" "rede globo" or "+ vc" "Mais Você" (the original target, although that has only ever been a redirect to the current target) are in (what Google Translate tells me is) Portuguese and the "vc" seems only to be used in titles as an abbreviation, probably for você (wikt:vc supports this). All together this doens't seem a useful redirect on the English Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pragmatics (journal)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete  . To make way for article. Randykitty (talk) 21:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Delete Pragmatics is not Journal of Pragmatics  &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Pragmatics (journal) → Journal of Pragmatics (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pragmatics_(journal)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * And now also per RK's new draft below. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete to make place for Draft:Pragmatics (journal). --Randykitty (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , you're an admin, just make the move? &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daybreak (TV programe)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Daybreak.  MBisanz  talk 20:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Daybreak (TV programe)">Daybreak (TV programe) → Daybreak (2010 TV programme) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daybreak_(TV_programe)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is an obvious error in attempting to create Daybreak (TV programme), which already exists and to which this misspelled redirect points. Nothing links to this redirect, so it's superfluous and ought to be deleted. Joeyconnick (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete (as nominator) —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Not sure why speedy deletion was declined using the R3 criteria when G6 was requested (db-error seems to apply here), but the misspelling doesn't seem that implausible to me and it doesn't appear to fall under WP:COSTLY. Suggest retarget to Daybreak since there are multiple TV shows with this title. PC78 (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "Not sure why": you and me both. 🤷🏼‍♂️ —Joeyconnick (talk) 00:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, or retarget to Daybreak. This doesn't need to exist, but I see no great tragedy if it is merely retargeted. bd2412  T 17:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Daybreak. It's not an implausible misspelling but it is ambiguous, so pointing to the relevant section of the dab page seems the best solution. Thryduulf (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.