Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 9

June 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 9, 2019.

Francesco Federico Cerruti
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . Deryck C. 12:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Francesco Federico Cerruti → Federico Cerruti (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francesco_Federico_Cerruti&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Neither the target article, nor its citations, nor the linked articles on itWiki and deWiki, make any mention of the subject's first name being Francesco. signed,Rosguill talk 21:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hallo, I pointed out that the complete name of the collector from Rivoli is "Francesco Federico Cerruti": please see the webpage of the Rivoli Castle, that hosts this collection, at: The Cerruti Collection: the new museum expansion. Another english reference is this. Cheers, --Marco Ciaramella (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The page should probably be moved to that title since that was his name and that is how he was known. The foundation that administers his collection is the Fondazione Francesco Federico Cerruti per l'Arte. See, e.g., La Stampa, La Stampa, the Gazzetta Ufficiale etc. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Given that the sources currently cited for the actual article skew toward not including Francesco, however, I'm not sure it's appropriate to move it yet, although I think the redirect has been justified at this point. signed,Rosguill talk 23:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with your point. Cheers, --Marco Ciaramella (talk) 08:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3SWR
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy keep  . Evidence justifying the redirect was provided, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) signed,Rosguill talk 23:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)


 * 3SWR → ABC South West Victoria (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3SWR&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target, no apparent connection. I was able to find an internet radio station named SWR3,, but it appears to be a Top 40 station based in Germany so I don't think it's related. signed,Rosguill talk 20:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

This is an actual callsign for a radio station located at Portland, Victoria, Australia. Refer to this list at the ACMA website. New World Man (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * looking at the PDF, I see that it is a radio station, but it doesn't mention any affiliation with the current target, other than operating in a similar area. Are these actually the same station? signed,Rosguill talk 23:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Please go to this link and enter "PORTLAND 3305". It will tell you the radio station called "ABC South West Victoria" broadcasts on 96.9 MHz at Portland, Victoria. New World Man (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok that checks out, although for anyone else looking to check that link, including "Portland" in the search terms returns no results, you need to just search for 3305. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Acalephae
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was soft delete  . Deryck C. 12:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Acalephae → Cnidaria (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acalephae&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target or discussed in any depth in any other article. Per Wiktionary, Acalephae is an obsolete taxonomic group in the phylum Coelenterata, so that article might be a closer match, but I think the term would have to be mentioned somewhere, so as to clarify whether it's in current use and how it relates or related to the target (as a synonym, subgroup or something else) for the redirect to be useful. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nadeș River (Arieș)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 17%23Nadeș River (Arieș)

Wikipedia:AN/?
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Deryck C. 12:59, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * AN/? → Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Δ (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:AN/%3F&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unused redundant shortcut. We already have WP:AN/B and WP:AN/Δ. I suggest this be deleted with no prejudice against a recreation for another target. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Fine, delete it. I had already forgotten about it.  — Jeff G. ツ 03:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the talk page notification if that was rude. I didn't actually check who made this redirect. :/ &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Not rude, expected.  — Jeff G. ツ 04:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.