Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 14

March 14
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 14, 2019.

29 Years (film)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy keep.  Withdrawn by nominator and no other delete or retarget arguments were presented. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


 * 29 Years (film) → 26 Years (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=29_Years_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete. A simple typo; if you look at the article's very first revision it uses the film's correct title in the main text and infobox, so clearly just a mistake. PC78 (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article indicates the original title of the screenplay was 29 years, and 29 years was originally intended to be the title of the movie. There are at least two sources in the article which refer to it as 29 years. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia  ᐐT₳LKᐬ  16:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad, I missed that in the article. Not sure how useful it really is but I guess it's valid so happy to withdraw. PC78 (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Citigold
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep and restore  . Some were restored, the rest were either keep and retarget per discussion (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Citigold → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citigold&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank, North America → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank,_North_America&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Canada → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Canada&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Direct → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Direct&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Ecuador → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Ecuador&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Singapore IPB → Citibank Singapore (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Singapore_IPB&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank South Dakota, N.A. → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_South_Dakota,_N.A.&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Thailand → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Thailand&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank Vietnam → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_Vietnam&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Citibank vietnam → Citibank (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citibank_vietnam&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete As we have determined previously, redirects from multiple non-notable products or business units to their parent company will certainly get WP:COSTLY UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Citibank, North America per the infobox. as a plausible error. Restore Citigold, Citibank Canada, Citibank Ecuador, Citibank Thailand, and Citibank Vietnam per WP:BLAR. Retarget Citibank vietnam to Citibank Vietnam if restored. Retarget Citibank Singapore IPB to Citibank International Personal Bank Singapore. Delete Neutral on Citibank South Dakota, N.A. per nom my comment below . -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The infobox was incorrect and I corrected it: N.A. stands for "National Association," not "North America". UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I see that now. One other thing I want to point out is the article mentions that Citibank chartered a South Dakota subsidiary to take advantage of new laws.... It appears the subsidiary is named "Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.", but I'm debating whether or not it's a plausible redirect. I'm going neutral for now. -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bulk nomination + split decision by the one participant = relist for more input

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 13:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have no opinion on the redirects, but is RfD the appropriate venue to deal with what would effectively be deletion of redirected former articles? Or should they be restored and taken to AfD? --Paul_012 (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Generally articles that were redirected boldly or after a discussion that did not lead to a consensus to redirect should not be deleted at RfD but should be restored without prejudice to prod (if eligible) or AfD, unless the restored article would be speedily deleted. Retargetting such a redirect at RfD is usually regarded as fine. I've not looked at these redirects specifically yet. Thryduulf (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Either keep or restore Citigold, Citibank Canada, Citibank Ecuador, Citibank Thailand, and Citibank Vietnam, then, without prejudice against immediate PROD or AfD. Retarget Citibank Singapore IPB to Citibank International Personal Bank Singapore. No opinion on the rest. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ragnar Larsson
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 22%23Ragnar Larsson