Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 31

March 31
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2019.

Internexus English Language School
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Internexus English Language School → Regent's University London (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internexus_English_Language_School&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target article, someone claiming to represent the school has asserted that they are not the same organization, and after doing my own checking on both school's websites I am inclined to agree, I don't see a connection. If there was one it appears to no longer exist. This should therefore either be deleted or made into a stand-alone article. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * According to the now-reverted stub, "At one point Intrernexus (sic) operated on the campus of Regent's University in the UK, but that relationship is no longer active"", so that appears to be the reason for the redirect. But if that relationship is now historical and there's no reference to Internexus at the target, then I think we need to delete the redirect or reinstate the stub (with sources and with a bit of cleanup). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. "operated on the campus of" is not enough of a connection. It would be different if it were ever an actual part of the university. DGG ( talk ) 11:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Db-cnr
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD.  Thryduulf (talk) 08:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Template:Db-cnr → Template:Db-r2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Db-cnr&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not all WP:CNRs are eligible for deletion per WP:R2, so this redirect could be seen as misleading unless the criterion is updated to include the speedy deletion of all cross-namespace redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Feel free to delete, with my (the creator's) consent. I don't really care if this redirect gets to stay; it was just an idea I had on a whim. Geolodus (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trump (First Lady)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 09:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Trump (First Lady) → Melania Trump (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_(First_Lady)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not sure what we should do with this. It seems like an implausible redirect. Thoughts? Goveganfortheanimals (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete. Unlikely redirect. Turgan Talk 07:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Weak(ish) Keep - seems pretty harmless to me, redirects being cheap and all that... I don't see where it creates any confusion, and it's just about plausible, imvho. I don't feel particularly strongly about this, though. -- Begoon 11:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)-- Begoon 11:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep seems like a reasonable, if uncommon, search term and the target is both correct and unambiguous so I don't see any benefit to deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no other (First Lady) redirects. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * There are other articles and redirects titled like this: Bush (First Lady) (→ Bush family), Barbara Bush (First Lady) (→ Barbara Bush), Caroline Scott (First Lady) (→ Caroline Harrison), Clinton (First Lady) (→Hillary Clinton), Dee Johnson (First Lady) (→Gary Johnson), Diane Patrick (First Lady) (→Deval Patrick), Kiyoko Fukuda (First Lady) (an article), Mary Johnson (first lady) (an article), Obama (First Lady) (→Michelle Obama) and Rebecca Stevens (first lady) (an article). Thryduulf (talk) 16:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm, only Barbara Bush (First Lady) shows up in the first 20 searches. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=20&offset=0&ns0=1&search=%28first+lady%29&advancedSearch-current={} but fine, I guess someone would find it useful. Striking. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: This search term can be quite useful, if someone forgets Melania's first name. CycloneYoris talk! 21:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed, apparently even her own husband can't always remember it. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should 'improve' Melanie (disambiguation) for him. -- Begoon 17:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. not that we should encourage Trump-related redirects, but this is reasonable enough.  DGG ( talk ) 11:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Thryduulf and CycloneYoris. Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.