Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 6

May 6
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 6, 2019.

Homosexual lifestyle
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 15%23Homosexual lifestyle

Carnival samba schools
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Explosão da Zona Norte → Brazilian Carnival (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Explos%C3%A3o_da_Zona_Norte&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Cacique do Parque → Brazilian Carnival (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cacique_do_Parque&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Isso Memo → Brazilian Carnival (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isso_Memo&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete per WP:R #10, none of these are mentioned at the target and they have articles on Portuguese Wikipedia. signed,Rosguill talk 22:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:Chortle
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 18:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Portal:Chortle → Portal:Comedy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Chortle&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete I think the connection between this unused redirect and its target is just a little too remote. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as not useful. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 09:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I have to admit this is almost kind of funny, but it isn't useful or needed as it is extremely unlikely anyone would search for it. Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let this become to a joke for those who peruse the deletion and RfD logs. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2 → Resident Evil Outbreak: File 2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Resident_Evil:_Outbreak_%E2%80%93_File_%EF%BC%832&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Resident Evil: Outbreak - File ＃2 → Resident Evil Outbreak: File 2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Resident_Evil:_Outbreak_-_File_%EF%BC%832&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Ojamajo Doremi＃: The Movie → Ojamajo Doremi (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ojamajo_Doremi%EF%BC%83:_The_Movie&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Exo from Exoplanet ＃1 - The Lost Planet → Exo from Exoplanet 1 – The Lost Planet (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exo_from_Exoplanet_%EF%BC%831_-_The_Lost_Planet&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Exo Planet ＃3 - The Exo'rdium → Exo Planet 3 – The Exo'rdium (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exo_Planet_%EF%BC%833_-_The_Exo%27rdium&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Exo Planet ＃2 - The Exo'luxion → Exo Planet 2 – The Exo'luxion (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exo_Planet_%EF%BC%832_-_The_Exo%27luxion&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete Follow on to related nomination Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26: these redirects have the double-width sharp symbol character ＃standing in for the forbidden #. Even more than the redirects with an initial sharp symbol, these are very unlikely to be needed in the search bar and could become very WP:COSTLY. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 19:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. It's unlikely that anyone is going to search with a double-width sharp, and a link containing such a standalone character is WP:ASTONISHING. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gull Island (Niagara River)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 15%23Gull Island (Niagara River)

Gull Island (Lake Kagawong)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 15%23Gull Island (Lake Kagawong)

Wikipedia:GRUDGE
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to What Wikipedia is not. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 01:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * GRUDGE → Wikipedia:Competence is required (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:GRUDGE&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The section/anchor that this redirect targets was removed in April 2018. I agree with that removal; grudging is not an issue of competence so I don't think it should be restored. Nevertheless, it is a genuine behavorial issue and the link was used as recently as in the Arbcom case desysopping Enigmaman that closed today. It probably should be retargeted somewhere, but there is nowhere obvious. Perhaps Harassment? <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 17:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete or retarget. There may be a proper place for this to point to, (possibly some part of Tendentious editing?) but CIR isn't it. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment from the redirect's creator: Six-and-a-half years ago, when I created the redirect, I'm sure it seemed like a good idea. WP:CIR has changed considerably since then. If an obvious retarget doesn't present itself, I wouldn't have any objection to a speedy deletion under G7. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to What Wikipedia is not, which begins "Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear.". Thryduulf (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget. Thryduulf's target makes sense, until/unless someone finds a better one. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:31, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget per Thryduulf, seems like a good place to point. How weird that I just happened to see this because I was curious if there was some project space information on holding grudges right when this was up for discussion.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 00:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Khamoshi (2017 film)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Khamoshi (2017 film)">Khamoshi (2017 film) → Chakri Toleti (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khamoshi_(2017_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The film is scheduled to release in 2019. <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not released in 2017 so confusing. PC78 (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia normally dates media by when it was released, with only rare and justified exceptions (e.g. unpublished works). Actually, I'm not sure if any pages are dated by their creation instead of their release; I imagine the number is extremely small. Regardless, this redirect suggests there is a 2017 film that's separate from the 1997 film and upcoming film (among other media), so it should be deleted for being misleading. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Keyboards
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Keyboard. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Noting that keyboard is a disambiguation page and so presumably there is no primary topic, it seems sensible that its plural form should redirect to the disambiguation, not to one of the articles. It may not be as straightforward as I see it, so opening for discussion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keyboards → Keyboard instrument (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keyboards&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Comment on the page of a googles search for "keyboards" 9/10 hits were related to the musical instrument, and 8/10 on page 2 were. Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, but were they related to the hardware interface for those instruments, or particular instruments which are played by that method? We have two separate articles for those slightly different topics. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I went and looked again. Of the first 30 hits, 16 (including 9 of the first 10) are for instruments, 2 are for both instruments and interface, 11 are for computer keyboards, and 1 is unclear (it doesn't play nicely with ublock origin). Thryduulf (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Retarget per nom. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. This probably doesn't help much, but the earliest telecommunications keyboards were piano keyboard style. There is some crossover here. <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 15:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget per nom. Very compelling reasons would be needed to argue otherwise; this actually makes me wonder how many plural redirects don't redirect to their singular form when the singular is a disambiguation. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget to dab &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Encore from The Dutchess
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was soft delete  Thryduulf (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Encore from The Dutchess → The Dutchess (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Encore_from_The_Dutchess&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target history. Apparently according to the history of the redirect this was meant to be a 2-disc deluxe edition of the album. Richhoncho (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 14:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ananya Panday
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Ananya Pandey → Student of the Year 2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ananya_Pandey&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

"Ananya Pandey" is the name of an Indian actress who is make her debut with the film Student of the Year 2. She is the daughter of well-known actor Chunky Pandey. There needs to be a dedicated Wikipedia article in her name and the existing redirect doesn't make any sense. Hence, I propose this redirect to be deleted. -Yoonadue (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ananya Panday → Student of the Year 2 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ananya_Panday&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Comment This redirect exists following Articles for deletion/Ananya Panday (December 2018) which concluded it was WP:TOOSOON for an article. Sockpuppet activity before and after the AfD resulted in the title being extended confirmed protected. Thryduulf (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am not asking to create a new article named "Ananya Pandey". But atleast the current redirect should be removed as it doesn't make any sense. How can a movie name be as equivalent to an actress name? They are two different entities. Let the redirect be removed and whether a new article in her name should be created soon or not, it should be left to the editors. -Yoonadue (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You said it doesn't make any sense that an actor's name targets a film article but I wanted to note it's actually a fairly common practice here. It's a type of sub-topic or other topic which [is] described or listed within a wider article (as puts it).  While it may seem somewhat odd that it's applied to a person, it's not outside the norm for a person who is notable for only one event. However, you could make an argument for deleting the redirect entirely if there's no obvious target, but this doesn't seem to be the case to me here.  eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * See also Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 9. Thryduulf (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That discussion has been closed, with the nomination merged into this one. Thryduulf (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ...And then Thryduulf edit conflicts me in doing this task. Either way, it got done! Steel1943  (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep both unless a draft worthy for publishing as an article and resolve the concerns stated in the above-referenced AfD is created. Steel1943  (talk) 22:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is, redirecting to Student of the Year 2. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Can I ask to review the draft as post the movie release talks about her already begin in news for her debut movie. --Crsakhale (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Someone Write an article She is Ananya Pandey, of course, there should be an article on her NO REDIRECTION! she is independently notable after Student of the Year 2 --WikiLover97 (talk) 20:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * See WP:NACTOR. You can improve her draft if you think it can attain notability. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Suggestion Ananya Panday I see there is this page which is definitely not correct as her name is Ananya Pandey Not "Panday" So I would suggest Ananya Panday this should be deleted and protected for some time until this gets solved --WikiLover97 (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Her parents name includes "Pandey" as last name, but she names herself as Ananya Panday (source), seen on verified social handles and on most of news article --Crsakhale (talk) 03:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I turned your reference into an external link because the reference is linked at the bottom of the page. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is: The subject doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR, which requires that an actor appear in a minimum of two released films to warrant a Wikipedia article, so a new article in the near future is impossible. See Janhvi Kapoor etc for similar cases. It is only natural that 'Ananya Panday' redirects to her only film appearance. DeluxeVegan (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the article doesn't currently present any information beyond the fact that she appeared in the film, I imagine the "Marketing and release" and "Reception" sections could be expanded to include more detailed discussion. If she becomes notable later, she can always have her own article again. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canada International Film Festival
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 14%23Canada International Film Festival

Apple products
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 14%23Apple products

Fox (magazine)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Fox (disambiguation) (effectively, disambiguate). I've expanded that section based on this discussion. --BDD (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Fox (magazine)">Fox (magazine) → List_of_pornographic_magazines (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fox_(magazine)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete, not mentioned on target, unrelated to Fox Magazine, not very notable porn site, creator blocked. 84.46.52.237 (talk) 06:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Retarget: Removed in this edit, and linked by a few articles. Suggest blacklinking it (and probably a bunch of other entries) in the list in Magna Publishing Group, and redirecting there. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, Fox on Magna Publishing Group could be unlinked, and the redirect can be a . The DAB idea below requires a logged in DAB expert (=not me ;) –84.46.53.77 (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Disambig between Fox Magazine and The Fox (magazine), as it's an equally likely search term for both. If there is consensus to mention the pornographic magazine somewhere, that can be added to the dab page with a redirect like Fox (pornographic magazine) as it is not the primary topic for the search term. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Am happy with rename and change to DAB at basename ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 12:19, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. The magazine in question does not receive discussion anywhere and neither "Fox Magazine" nor the magazine called "The Fox" would be known simply as "Fox". Disambiguating this title would be a violation of WP:INCOMPDAB. Instead, the proper solution if there are multiple magazines known as "Fox" would be to list them at Fox (disambiguation). However, that doesn't even work in this case because The Fox (disambiguation) is significant enough to warrant its own disambiguation. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Abi-hime
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Abi-hime → List of Inuyasha characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abi-hime&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Abi-Hime → List of Inuyasha characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abi-Hime&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Yet another minor fictional character that is no longer mentioned at the list article it points to. This one is briefly mentioned in a couple of other articles but there is no substance that justifies a redirect. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Absalom (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 16:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Absalom (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)">Absalom (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) → List of minor Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Absalom_(Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="Absalom (Buffyverse)">Absalom (Buffyverse) → List of minor Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Absalom_(Buffyverse)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A minor character that apparently is too minor for the list of minor characters. Not mentioned. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * you removed this character from the list in this edit along with around 14kB of other material in 2007. At Talk:List of minor Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters you seemed to imply that much of this material would soon be incorporated into a separate list.  Anything happened on that front?  Is there a new target you can suggest for the redirect? <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 17:41, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 2007 is a while, especially in Wikipedia time, and since the editor in question only sporadically contributes, they might not notice the ping until this discussion is over. I've left a message on their talk page to increase the likelihood they notice this question; I recommend reviewing other editor's contributions before pinging them to ensure the ping will reach them in a timely manner.
 * Also, the removal looks more like a clerical error than an intentional omission or a splitting of the lists. The edit summary is, so they were revising existing content, not splitting off old content. Perhaps they intended to rewrite the section on Absalom but forgot to add it back into the article. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 23:05, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I consider myself a fan but had to dig through the history to remember who this was, and even now, it's just a vague recollection. It's appropriate to not list him among the minor characters. --BDD (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

嘻哈中的伴侣暴力
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete.  As duplicating an existing topic. this never should've been converted to  redirect at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="嘻哈中的伴侣暴力">嘻哈中的伴侣暴力 → Partner violence in hip hop (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%98%BB%E5%93%88%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E4%BC%B4%E4%BE%A3%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Per WP:FORRED, not particularly related to Chinese or Chinese language per se. China or anything close is not even mentioned in the target article. – Ammarpad (talk) 04:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 09:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The history should be transwikied to zh.wp before deletion though. Thryduulf (talk) 11:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sudheer Yadav
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  for now. If a sourced mention of Sudheer is added to the target, then feel free to recreate/restore and tag with R from relative. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 13:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Sudheer Yadav → Laxmi Narayan Yadav (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudheer_Yadav&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect was originally proposed as an alternative to creating an article about Sudheer Yadav, Laxmi's son who does not appear to be notable independent of his father. A merge was suggested and implemented by as an alternative to A7 deletion. However, the content was later removed from the target article, making this redirect confusing and unwarranted. Pinging who appears to have removed the last mention of Sudheer from the target, and, who originally proposed A7 deletion of this article. signed,Rosguill talk 19:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete There is absolutely no reason to have this as a redirect and imo violates BLP policy. Praxidicae (talk) 19:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per long standing precedent at WP:INVALIDBIO. Also see Articles for deletion/Jim and Mary McCartney (2nd nomination). <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  15:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There should at least be a mention in the target article, and then this should be kept as a standard R from relative. --BDD (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.