Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 27

September 27
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 27, 2019.

Mashood Alam
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Mashood Alam → Aladdin (2019 film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mashood_Alam&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target. An internet search would suggest that Mashood Alam is the name of a Pakistani actor, but I wasn't able to find any mention of association with the new Aladdin film. signed,Rosguill talk 17:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * He is credited for being part of Aladdin film. In addition to this, has some short movies on his credit. --Spasage (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Could you provide some evidence that he's associated with the Aladdin film? If it's a trivial role (i.e. not enough to be due mention in the article) then we still shouldn't have the redirect. His work on other films is irrelevant because we're not judging his general notability here, we're judging the suitability of this one redirect––if anything, him being notable for other roles is an argument against this redirect because in that case we should just create an article. signed,Rosguill talk 19:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Here are few references. He is from Pakistan and worked in Hollywood movies. He also has IMDB entry. --Spasage (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Performer-to-performance redirects are inherently problematic because a single performer can perform in multiple performances, and there needs to be a compelling reason to link them to just one of their performances. This one is relatively new and has no critical page history or incoming links. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Interior penance
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete , though I'll happily issue a WP:REFUND if someone wants to work on the draft after all. Since the draft was declined based on the topic already being covered in mainspace, that seems unlikely. --BDD (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Draft:Interior penance → Sacrament of Penance (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Interior_penance&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Recommend the article/redirect be deleted. The article has not been edited since December 2018 when it was changed to a redirect after a declined submission in November 2018. It is not eligible for speedy deletion under WP:G13 as it is a redirect: "Redirects are exempt from G13 deletion." Archer1234 (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: What reason is there for deletion? Geolodus (talk) 15:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedily delete: cross-namespace redirect. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 17:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, or restore draft and handle as appropriate. Declined drafts should not be redirected to mainspace. No one is going to search for a draft, so a redirect is inherently useless. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angara villege
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Angara villege → Angara, East Godavari district (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angara_villege&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Typo redirect resulting from a page move. There are other places in the world called Angara and it's not clear to me why this one should be favoured over others. Reyk YO! 11:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as it is not a useful redirect and seems to have been accidentally created.--DreamLinker (talk) 12:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and DreamLinker. A record of the move is retained in the page history of the target page, so attribution is not a concern. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maroon Line (Hong Kong)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 8%23Maroon Line (Hong Kong)

1984 (2019 film)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * 1984 (2019 film) → American Horror Story: 1984 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1984_(2019_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Target is not a film. Implausible redirect.  Onel 5969  TT me</i> 09:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as misleading. Geolodus (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Implausible, if it were (2019 series) then I would say keep, but it isn't a film. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 19:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SPC sound format
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


 * SPC sound format → Super Nintendo Entertainment System (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SPC_sound_format&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * SPC700 sound format → Super Nintendo Entertainment System (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SPC700_sound_format&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These redirects refer to a file format (actually known as “SPC” with no numerals) which is used for music ripped from SNES games, but the target article never mentions or describes such a format; the SPC700 is a chip on the system’s audio processor, but the article contains precisely one mention of the term, in an infobox listing only its clock rate. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC) edited 01:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I'm not much of a technician so I don't know the console specs, but even if those were inside the console, still seems like a pair of implausible redirects. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 19:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trillion (disambiguation )
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * <span id="Trillion (disambiguation )">Trillion (disambiguation ) → Trillion (disambiguation) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trillion_(disambiguation_)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Similar to the recently-deleted Trillian (disambiguation ), this is a malformed disambiguation page with an extra space before the closing parenthesis. It is a r from move, but the page was only at this title for about 20 minutes in June. Delete. - Eureka Lott 01:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I do not believe it is a plausible typo in links or in searches. ComplexRational (talk) 01:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems like an exceptional and delayed case of WP:R3 to me. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:RDAB. PC78 (talk) 04:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedily delete per nom. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 17:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.