Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 27

April 27
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 27, 2020.

High Exit-Only Turnstile
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5%23High Exit-Only Turnstile

Genius (2017 film)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4%23Genius (2017 film)

Danionin Common Name Disambiguation
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Danionin Common Name Disambiguation → List of Danionin species by common name (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danionin_Common_Name_Disambiguation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is...a kind of weird way to format a page title, even though I can see someone capitalizing every word and/or forgetting the parentheses. Still, I'm kinda tilting towards deleting this (or whatever action is best here), unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC  678  20:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep this is eleven years old, and not harmful. All the best: Rich Farmbrough  (the apparently calm and reasonable) 23:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep per Rich and . — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 23:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't believe that this is actually helpful given the way as which it's formatted. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although it's extremely unlikely that anyone will ever actually use this redirect, it does no harm, and Redirects are cheap. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The combination of the unusal wording and the violation of WP:SENTENCECASE mean this is so unlikely as to lack any usefulness. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 18:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 21:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this unlikely search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Implausible search term inconsistent with our titling conventions in at least two ways. Narky Blert (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ... and why is that a reason to delete redirects which often don't conform with weird titling conventions? — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angmar
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Angmar: Land of the Witch King. signed,Rosguill talk 22:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Angmar → Nazgûl (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angmar&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A place name not mentioned at the target, only in the title of one of the Nazgûl. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - I'd like to note that Angmar: Land of the Witch King exists and could be abbreviated as just Angmar. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Angmar: Land of the Witch King unless a mention is added at Geography of Middle-earth. Currently, the Middle-earth Kingdom of Angmar is not directly discussed anywhere, although it may be worth adding to the Geography of Middle-earth article. Hog Farm (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to History of Arda, where the Angmar wars on the northern kingdom of Arnor are mentioned. Clearly there is scope to extend Geography of Middle-earth with a range of such details also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 18:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b<b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 21:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget - I've given this some more thought. Keeping in mind the tangential nature of this location to what's described in 'History of Arda' and the fact that it's not mentioned elsewhere apparently, I'm inclined to think that the redirect ought to go to Angmar: Land of the Witch King. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Samux
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Samukh. signed,Rosguill talk 22:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Samux → Nəbiağalı (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samux&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Redirection is wrong. This article is regarding a city, and Samukh District is different from Samukh. Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 12:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to Samukh District where the term is mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nəbiağalı is an old name of Samux. Nəbiağalı is now called Samux. There is not any other place in the name of Nəbiağalı. Samukh District is a rayon. But Samukh is a city. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 06:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * then edit the article Nəbiağalı to say so, and perhaps move it to Samux using WP:RM. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Samukh. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 21:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Redirect was not tagged until now, please do not close before seven days after this comment. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget - I agree that this should go to 'Samukh'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Equational
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was disambiguate  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Equational → Equative case (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Equational&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at target, couldn't find any instances in the wild not about algebra or logic. Based on the use of the term in Wikipedia, it seems WP:XY applies here. Paradoctor (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * changed to Dabify per Uanfala. Paradoctor (talk) 18:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Equation as R from adjective — all of those are about some type of equation. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 22:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Equational class is not about some type equations, it is about an algebraic structure that involves equations. Neither is equational logic. And equational sentence is not about equations in formal languages, at all. Importantly, equation discusses none of the meanings of "equational", it doesn't even mention them. Paradoctor (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Dabify. In linguistics, "equational" is a synonym for equative (which is the broad topic subsuming the equative case). There's at least one other meaning – as the adjective for equation, but I'm sure there'll be more maths-related entries to add. – Uanfala (talk) 23:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That was my first impulse, but doesn't this go against WP:PTM? Paradoctor (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Equational is not a PTM for Equative, so you must be referring to the maths uses; but there things aren't as clear cut as they might seem at first (this was discussed at some length in 2016). – Uanfala (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'd personally prefer that we just let people search. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The problem with that is that the search algorithm tries to guess what you are looking for. Which means "equational" gets stemmed to "equation", reducing the number of genuine hits, and swamping them in irrelevant results. "Equational" is specific enough that a dab page is helpful. Delivering better targeted results than search algorithms is the whole reason we maintain dab pages. Paradoctor (talk) 10:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 21:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I've drafted a dab page below the redirect. I've cast it in the most general terms, leaving out any suspect partial title matches. – Uanfala (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate per Uanfala's draft. BD2412  T 03:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Questionably useful fims
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Man Alive (fim)">Man Alive (fim) → Man Alive (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Man_Alive_(fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in fim → Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in film (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles_in_fim&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Justice Chaudhry (1982 fim)">Justice Chaudhry (1982 fim) → Justice Chaudhury (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Justice_Chaudhry_(1982_fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Yevadu (2012 fim)">Yevadu (2012 fim) → Yevadu (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yevadu_(2012_fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Uchakattam (1980 fim)">Uchakattam (1980 fim) → Uchakattam (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uchakattam_(1980_fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Shrink fim → Shrink wrap (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shrink_fim&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Bhojpuri fim industry → Bhojpuri cinema (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bhojpuri_fim_industry&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Trial (1993 fim)">The Trial (1993 fim) → The Trial (1993 film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Trial_(1993_fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="The Circuit 3: Street Monk (2006 fim)">The Circuit 3: Street Monk (2006 fim) → The Circuit 3: Street Monk (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Circuit_3:_Street_Monk_(2006_fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Psycho Raman (fim)">Psycho Raman (fim) → Raman Raghav 2.0 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psycho_Raman_(fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Tramontane (fim)">Tramontane (fim) → Tramontane (film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tramontane_(fim)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These redirects don't seem to get very many pageviews, possibly due to the questionably plausible typo of "film." While it is useful to keep some of these around (like Amaanat (1994 fim), which has had 982 pageviews in the last 20 days alone), I'm not really sure about these eleven, most of which are leftovers from moves to the correct spellings. Regards, SONIC  678  19:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all - We have clear precedent for getting rid of these types of redirects. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I confirmed that there are no articles using these redirects. I also updated the four articles that linked to Amaanat (1994 fim) to link to Amaanat instead, so the number of page views should go way down in the future.  GoingBatty (talk) 21:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep all ; there's nothing to be gained by deleting these redirects. Easy to skim over one letter, especially when on QWERTY keyboards is between  and .  and RHARMFUL apply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J947 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There was a similar rfd sometime after March 11 where the consensus was delete (and by the way yes I voted delete in that discussion). Ocelot Creeper  ( ta lk ) 00:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * LOCALCONSENSUS does not override general consensus. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all: Especially Yevadu as the film was released in 2014, not '12. <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  03:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair, delete . — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Useless clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all, unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Shrink Film and Shrink Wrap. This is a good use of a redirect.  The terms are almost interchangeable.  Pkgx (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The nominated redirect is Shrink fim, not Shrink film. (Notice the missing "l".) Steel1943  (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you - - - I missed that. Pkgx (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. This is merely pollution. BD2412  T 03:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020 United States House of Representatives election in New Jersey
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7  performed by  signed,Rosguill talk 19:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * 2020 United States House of Representatives election in New Jersey → New Jersey (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_United_States_House_of_Representatives_election_in_New_Jersey&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Maine → Maine (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Maine&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, I'm not sure what use this redirect could serve. I would suggest deletion to encourage article creation. signed,Rosguill talk 18:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gen W
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 7%23Gen W

Boss Belly
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Deryck C. 21:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Boss Belly → Harrow Road Boyz (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boss_Belly&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 17:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Enwiki would appear to have no information about Boss Belly. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:REDLINKBIO seems to be an independent WP:GARAGE rapper, but not notable for now. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suspect (rapper)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 18:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Suspect (rapper)">Suspect (rapper) → Peckham Boys (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suspect_(rapper)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 17:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obscure musician that doesn't merit mentioning anywhere. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Enwiki would appear to have no information about a rapper called Suspect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete more WP:GARAGE rappers. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Little Alex Horne
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4%23Little Alex Horne

Punjabi script
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Punjabi script → Gurmukhi (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Punjabi_script&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Punjabi is also written in Shahmukhi not just Gurmukhi Tsla1337 (talk) 15:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Read the last time this was brought up on the talk page, and you'll see why that's irrelevant. Shahmukhi is Perso-Arabic script. That is, Punjabi is written in two scripts, Perso-Arabic and its own, called Gurmukhi. "Punjabi script" is necessarily the script for Punjabi, that is, Gurmukhi. Any confusion can be handled with a hat note. — kwami (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree fundamentally with Kwamikagami to keep, but definitely think the Gurmukhi page needs a hatnote to see also Shahmukhi if this redirect is kept. Another alternative I would support would be to repurpose the redirect into a disambiguation page pointing to both the Gurmukhi and Perso-Arabic writing systems for the Punjabi language. VanIsaacWS<sup style="margin-left:-3.0ex">cont 23:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought it did have a hat note. I just added one. As for being a dab page, besides it being a violation of TWODABS, it's technically incorrect -- Shahmukhi is not a Punjabi script, but a foreign script applied to Punjabi. "Chinese script", for example, is a rd to Chinese characters, not a dab page pointing to Chinese characters and Pinyin, even though a lot of Chinese is written in Pinyin (military telegrams, for example). — kwami (talk) 04:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stormy Weather (ilm)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Stormy Weather (ilm)">Stormy Weather (ilm) → Stormy Weather (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stormy_Weather_(ilm)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not sure how plausible this misspelling of "film" is in this context...it got only four pageviews in 2019, and nothing links to it. Regards, SONIC  678  14:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this unambiguous error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no reason to keep this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ocelot Creeper  ( ta lk ) 02:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seless lutter. Narky Blert (talk) 10:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (film) already exists and goes to the disambiguation. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Refine to Stormy Weather per and RHARMFUL; this doesn't interfere with search results so is completely harmless. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Misspelled disambiguator missing an entire letter that seems target important ... since otherwise, it looks like "Elm" as well. Just get rid of it. Steel1943  (talk) 21:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, redirect has no value. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 10:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

COVIDemic
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * COVIDemic → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVIDemic&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Another silly one. See also. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 13:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. No evidence of usage. --MarioGom (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed. I'm not seeing this used by reliable sources at all. Searching reveals nothing but random chatter, really. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Eh, some people are calling it that, and it's a totally WP:HARMLESS redirect (WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP). Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Soumyabrata stay at home 🏠 wash your hands 👋 to protect from COVID-19 😷 10:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a plausible search term. It's usage is incredibly obscure, even on social media. <sub style="color:#0D5218;">wjemather <sup style="color:#520D0D;">please leave a message... 11:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gameloft Pune
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Gameloft Pune → List of Ubisoft subsidiaries (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gameloft_Pune&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Redirect is for a subdivision of a company that is not notable enough even for a redirect. (Talking about the subdivision, not the company) RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. "Gameloft Pune" is the former name "Ubisoft Pune" (Ubisoft acquired the studio from Gameloft in 2008). Both the present and former name are valid redirects to the very section that contains information about the studio in question. The redirect was already tagged as R from former name and redirects are cheap. I also fail to see how something could be "not notable enough" to have a redirect leading to its own information. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 10:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid redirect to directly relevant paragraph. <sub style="color:#0D5218;">wjemather <sup style="color:#520D0D;">please leave a message... 11:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - As stated above, this seems appropriate enough. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as useful; deleting this is pointless. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 22:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Points to a section with relevant information. Narky Blert (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Philip of France (1125-1161)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Philip of France (1125-1161)">Philip of France (1125-1161) → Louis VI of France (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_of_France_(1125-1161)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="Philip of France (1125–1161)">Philip of France (1125–1161) → Louis VI of France (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_of_France_(1125%E2%80%931161)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These are WP:RFD confusing, because the section does not list a Philip with these dates. The one with the en dash is only used at the disambiguation page Philip of France, and the other only in the infobox at Adelaide of Maurienne, piped as "Philip, Bishop of Paris" (he's an archdeacon in the target text). This is all a bit of a wild goose chase, so I think would be better served by a redlink. Therefore Delete unless there's a better target I've not found. 94.21.253.28 (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, jumping through French Wikipedia I see that we have him as fr:Philippe de France (1132-1161) which is IW'd to Philip of France, Archdeacon of Paris. I've updated the articles, but I still reckon the dates here are misleading, in the absence of Philip of France (1132-1160). (As the article states, he died in 1160 but his tombstone incorrectly reads 1161.) 94.21.253.28 (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The history: this redirect was automatically created in 2009 when I moved a page using these dates for disambiguation to Philip of France, Archdeacon of Paris specifically because the dates were just some editor's best guess. In 2015, Articles for deletion/Philip of France, Archdeacon of Paris was closed as merge to Louis VI of France and hence the redirect was retargeted. Then in 2017, Philip of France, Archdeacon of Paris was recreated.  If this is to be a redirect, it should go to that article, but I don't see much point in such a redirect existing because the dates themselves were a Wikipedia creation, not something someone is going to come here and search for. Agricolae (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete both - As long as the dates are incorrect, then these don't appear appropriate. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Auparashtika
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Fellatio as the most plausible target discovered by this discussion. Deryck C. 21:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Auparashtika → Oral sex (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Auparashtika&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Google tells me this is a word of Indian origin referring to gay oral sex, but it's not mentioned at the target. It is discussed in the Kama Sutra and perhaps could be mentioned in that article and retargeted there, but I don't know enough about the subject matter to know whether or not that's appropriate. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It's mentioned in Fellatio, although spelt auparishtaka. This spelling is also used in Hijra (South Asia), Hinduism and LGBT topics, Homosexuality and religion, Religion and LGBT people and LGBT culture in India. Spelt as auparashtika, the redirect is the only occurrence on WP. --John B123 (talk) 08:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 02:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fellatio, seems to both be the most appropriate of the possible targets (alongside perhaps Hijra (South Asia), Hinduism and LGBT topics, Kama Sutra and LGBT culture in India) currently has the most information about the term. signed,Rosguill talk 21:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hesitation
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was new article and retarget, hatnotes all around. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hesitation → Pause (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hesitation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Hesitant → Pause (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hesitant&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Pause is a dab page that doens't list any articles that are relevant to the concept of hesitation (Pausa is an unrelated concept for the end of an utterance). There's a vaguely related article at Doubt – it doesn't really cover the same ground but it might be a potential target. I'd rule out a soft redirect to wiktionary as this is an everyday word I wouldn't expect readers to need a dictionary definition for. – Uanfala (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget Hesitant to Neoregelia 'Hesitant'. I'm not seeing enough for a disambiguation. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget Hesitation to Stacie Orrico (album) since that's one of her songs. There are other albums that have a similarly named track: Hot Flash Heat Wave's Neapolitan, "Hesitations" by Fangclub album Culture Vulture, but their albums don't have articles yet.   Hesitation fits a number of partial title matches, like Hesitation waltz, Hesitation step, Hesitation roll, Hesitation wound, Hesitation Blues.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Because there are other uses that aren't notable on their own, outlined by Angus above, these redirects actively inhibit the use of Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC) Create article Hesitation per BD2412 and retarget Hesitate there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget both - Both of these should go to those two above mentioned opinions. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hesitation could be a disambiguation page, with links to the Stacie Orrico album, Wynton Marsalis (album), others that can be found searching for "hesitation" "track listing", and to the Wiktionary page for the word. Peter James (talk) 14:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * There was an ancient Christian faction called the "hesitants" or diakrinomenoi, moderates who hesitated to accept the Council of Chalcedon. See Timothy of Constantinople. Srnec (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 02:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate for now. We could potentially have an article on hesitation as a topic in psychology. BD2412  T 02:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: I have created Draft:Hesitation. There appears to be a surprising volume of psychological and philosophical literature on the significance of hesitation. BD2412  T 02:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Create page - I've changed my mind. This deserves its own conceptual article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Create article per BD2412.
 * Create Hesitation (disambiguation). I've added a draft at the end of Draft:Hesitation. Narky Blert (talk) 15:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you can just go ahead and create Hesitation (disambiguation) with the material you have provided. It can always be moved pending the outcome of this discussion. I should have the draft ready by the time this closes. BD2412  T 15:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Narky Blert (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * although I wouldn't call the draft done just yet, I think it proves the concept. Thoughts? BD2412  T 04:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy to endorse: I've changed my !vote. Thanks BD. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes: good work! The draft article can be moved to Hesitation. – Uanfala (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rolland Garros French Open
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Rolland Garros French Open → French Open (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rolland_Garros_French_Open&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete as this is a misspelling created by shortterm move. Agathoclea (talk) 06:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - In English this event is called the "French Open." In French it is "Championnats Internationaux de France de Tennis" or "Tournoi de Roland-Garros." There is no possibility of it ever being called "Rolland Garros French Open." Rolland is even misspelled! User refused deletion on the grounds it was a possible search topic and it was good faith. It was actually neither. No person would ever search the unnatural misspelled topic of "Rolland Garros French Open." And this is the second time this user has moved the page to a misspelled title. It was reverted and speedy deleted the first time on April 16, yet is was moved again 10 days later on April 26. Two different editors did the reverts. The only benefit of leaving it as a misspelled redirect is the editor wouldn't be able to move it there again without an administrator's help. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - it may be a misspelling, but a simple internet search shows it not to be an obscure one. As such this is a plausible search term and does not meet the criteria for deletion. <sub style="color:#0D5218;">wjemather <sup style="color:#520D0D;">please leave a message... 10:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - mainly per reasons mention by Fyunck(click). The misspelling "Rolland Garros" is already linked, see no need for this particular addition--Wolbo (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Referring to the event incorrectly as "Rolland-Garros" appears to happen online a lot, the mistake being done by even news sources The Guardian and UPI. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It is misspelled that way more than I would have thought. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, nothing to be gained by deleting this; it's helpful to the occasional reader. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 22:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * But who is it really going to help? If they misspell it Rolland Garros, there is already a redirect for that. Who is going to type "Rolland Garros French Open" where this new redirect would be useful? Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You still haven't provided a reason for deletion; anyone who does search is up will benefit from the redirect. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 01:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This is true, but by using that logic we should also have redirects for "George Washinton the Father of His Country", or "Grate Britain United Kingdom". We can do that just in case someone misspells Washinton and Grate and then adds two titles together, because that's what we're doing here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying we should make these redirects, I'm just saying it's useless to delete them. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Edited to clarify. — &thinsp; J 947 [cont] 05:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment should Rolland Garros and Roland Garos redirect to Roland Garros which is the disambiguation? Or is the French Open the primary topic for these typos? AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I would think that they should redirect to Roland Garros, since they are a misspelling of that word. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please follow MOS:LISTGAP. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I've given this some more thought. While the misspelling "Rolland Garros" is frequently made in reference to this event, the exact formulation of "Rolland Garros French Open" appears to be a different story. As stated above, people are either going to search for the first two words or the for latter two words, not all four bunched together, and thus this redirect doesn't appear to be helpful that much. I'm not too sure, but I lean to believing that deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.