Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 25

January 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 25, 2020.

Ilmarin
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 4%23Ilmarin

Middle-earth Dwarves
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 23:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Fror → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fror&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Frór → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fr%C3%B3r&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Fundin (Middle-earth) → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fundin_(Middle-earth)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Gloin, son of Thorin → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gloin,_son_of_Thorin&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Glóin, son of Thorin → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gl%C3%B3in,_son_of_Thorin&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Gróin → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gr%C3%B3in&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Grór → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gr%C3%B3r&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Nain I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nain_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Náin I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=N%C3%A1in_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Nain, son of Gror → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nain,_son_of_Gror&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Náin, son of Grór → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=N%C3%A1in,_son_of_Gr%C3%B3r&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Nain II → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nain_II&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Náin II → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=N%C3%A1in_II&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thorin I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thorin_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thorin III → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thorin_III&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thorin III Stonehelm → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thorin_III_Stonehelm&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thrain I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thrain_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thráin I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thr%C3%A1in_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thrain the Old → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thrain_the_Old&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thráin the Old → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thr%C3%A1in_the_Old&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thror → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thror&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Thrór → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thr%C3%B3r&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Farin → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Farin&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Dis (Middle-earth) → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dis_(Middle-earth)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Dís (Middle-earth) → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%C3%ADs_(Middle-earth)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Dain I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dain_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="Dáin I">Dáin I → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%C3%A1in_I&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These are all fictional dwarven historical figures from Tolkien. They exist as redirects primarily to populate a family tree. However, since the characters are non-notable, they are not mentioned on the target list. I propose we delete them all.

To see how unimportant these figures are, even in Middle-earth, see an old version of the deleted Middle-earth dwarf characters. BenKuykendall (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Not covered in Wikipedia, no purpose for these. Not even alternate uses through retargets. Hog Farm (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. If they're not mentioned in the target, readers will get precisely nothing useful out of such redirects. Narky Blert (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete except for Thrór, as he can probably be moved to List of The Hobbit characters, since he is moderately important in the backstory of the book.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Re-recorded song
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Re-recording (music). -- Tavix  ( talk ) 18:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Re-recorded song → Synthesizer (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Re-recorded_song&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

There doesn't seem to be any sensible article for this to go to. Cover version? But not all rerecorded songs are cover versions - sometimes artists record new versions of their own songs. For the last 13 years this has redirected to synthesizer, which isn't right at all. Is this a concept that needs a page / redirect at all? Popcornduff (talk) 21:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Are there any targets other than cover version which might make a disambiguation page reasonable? I'm not a fan of deletion given how long it's been pointing to the same target so I'm interested in alternatives to deletion. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Sound recording and reproduction? Though that article is rather vast and generic and doesn't have anything about the specific phenomenon of songs being rerecorded. Popcornduff (talk) 01:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to whatever suitable target presents itself when this RfD is closed and consensus determined, per, as it's technically a valid thing. Failing that, I would either support adding a reference to the existing target (call it a weak keep) or, failing that, delete (3rd choice), without prejudice to re-creation in future. --Doug Mehus T · C  21:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Cover version. As the nom indicates, this is not perfect. Let's be good. Perfect is the enemy of good. ~Kvng (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. A re-recorded song isn't necessarily a cover version, nor is the term exclusive to "cover version" either. For example, a song could be "re-recorded" if the first version of a recording is redone before being released commercially, etc. Best to delete this redirect so that Wikipedia's search function can do its job to help readers attempt to find the article which they are trying to locate and not pigeonhole them by redirecting them to any specific article. Steel1943  (talk) 04:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Steel1943. signed,Rosguill talk 16:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Steel1943 as ambiguous. A re-recording could be also almost anything, from a cover version, to a worked-up version of a demo, to a musician's or band's remake of an earlier recording, to an outtake recorded later than the released version. For just one example in classical music, Glenn Gould recorded Bach's Goldberg Variations twice, in 1955 and 1981, both highly acclaimed. Was the second version a re-recording? arguably, yes - but it's a totally different interpretation. Narky Blert (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Re-recording (music). This is a stub, but seems to discuss exactly the concept at hand. The article could be expanded to contrast with a cover version. BenKuykendall (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:XY. This could refer to cover versions, or the concept User:BenKuykendall found, or several other things.  With no clear priority for the redirect, I say delete. Hog Farm (talk) 04:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Re-recording (music) per BenKuykendall. Until the article is expanded, a hatnote can be added to direct readers to Cover version as needed. signed,Rosguill talk 21:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought I would need to change my !vote, but I kept my retarget target purposely vague and wide open as my !vote and rationale clearly favoured retargeting here—i.e., little rationale for deletion. Nevertheless, I support the target identified by ; nice find! Good work all! Doug Mehus T · C  18:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Re-recording (music) per BenKuykendall. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft delete - this has no incoming links from article space and almost zero usage in the last 90 days. The original version prior to becoming a redirect was WP:PRODded in 2006 at which time it was redirected to release (music) which at the time was "the event at which an album or single is first released for sale". Today that would be reissue, which is more of a sales and marketing and possibly an re-mastering or re-engineering than a true re-recording of the song.  If it is deleted, the version of 01:09, 23 July 2006 should be considered eligible for restoration upon request. It was basically a dictionary definition of an artist re-recording his own work with a few examples.  It would quickly fail or be sent to WP:Draft space if it went to WP:AfD today. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  19:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Having said that, makes a strong case for a weak deletion as it does have very little usage (less than 24 pageviews in the preceding 12 months). Combine that with no incoming links other than the creator's talk page, that's also compelling. The thing I come back to, though, and why I still favour retargeting, is that soft deletion would just mean it could be easily recreated. Per WP:NOTBURO, perhaps we should just save that step and retarget? If the earlier deleted article davidwr identified is undeleted, it would be Draft: namespace first; if and when it's notable, it can be moved by an administrator or page mover over this redirect, so that's probably moot now that I think about it. As to the low pageviews, no prejudice against revisiting this in a year's time, and potentially deleting it on a second nomination, if still low usage, to encourage article creation. This will be a tough close (probably best for an administrator to close this)! Doug Mehus  T · C  19:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Complete Single Collection
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Complete Singles Collection. --BDD (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Complete Single Collection → Cute (Japanese idol group) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Complete_Single_Collection&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is a rather generic term for an anthology album and does not unambiguously refer to the current target. I would suggest deletion so that the internal search engine can do its work. signed,Rosguill talk 18:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is a rather generic term and I don't think it should have redirected to Cute (Japanese idol group). lullabying (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Changing decision to Disambiguate with new findings by . lullabying (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Term is too generic to redirect to a specific discography. Hog Farm (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Changing !vote to Disambiguate per Miraclepine. Hog Farm (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate or redirect to Complete Singles Collection. Found three other articles and a disambig: Complete Single Collection '97–'08, Complete Singles Collection (Anti-Nowhere League album), The Complete Singles Collection 1994–2000, and Complete Singles Collection. ミラP 20:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:XY, too many possible terms. Not a fan of disambiguating or targeting a dab page because with the number of meanings, search results would likely be more useful than a manually curated list. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * This was my thinking as well. signed,Rosguill talk 01:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as ambiguous. Could possibly disambiguate in the future, but at present, deletion is the best route. Doug Mehus T · C  16:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Complete Singles Collection. It's a fairly generic title, but so are e.g. Golden Greats and The Complete Recordings, and all are plausible search terms. Narky Blert (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hedgehog flavoured
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . On a strict nosecount, this would appear to be an evenly split result. However, after analyzing the arguments, there is consensus here that those editors arguing to "keep" this redirect have the stronger and correct argument in that it is (a) mentioned in the target article and, thus, (b) a very plausible search term. (non-admin closure) Doug Mehus  T · C  15:41, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hedgehog flavoured → Potato chip (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hedgehog_flavoured&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target article. Third party search engines turn up results for some sort of defunct brand of potato chips, so may want to delete this per WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing in the target article. No meaningful coverage found to add. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Mentioned in the article (since 20 minutes ago), with three good-looking citations. Narky Blert (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The target article now covers the matter and so the issue is moot. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ethnic groups in locations
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget the redirects that Eureka Lott and BDD found targets for and delete the rest. I try to avoid a WP:TRAINWRECK closure wherever possible, and I think this is a good example of this: any redirects that someone singled out to keep will be kept, without prejudice against speedy individual renomination where there may be genuine disagreement. For those redirects begin deleted, this is also without prejudice against recreation as an article (like always) or to a target where there is discussion on the group. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * African Americans in Missouri → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Missouri&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * African Americans in New Jersey → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_New_Jersey&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Romani people in the Netherlands → Romani people (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Romani_people_in_the_Netherlands&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Romani people in Argentina → Romani people (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Romani_people_in_Argentina&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Vietnamese Americans in Los Angeles → Los Angeles (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vietnamese_Americans_in_Los_Angeles&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Indian Americans in Los Angeles → Los Angeles (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Americans_in_Los_Angeles&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * African Americans in Connecticut → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Connecticut&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * African Americans in Rhode Island → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Rhode_Island&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="African Americans in Washington, D.C.">African Americans in Washington, D.C. → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Washington,_D.C.&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * African Americans in Wisconsin → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Wisconsin&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Portuguese Americans in California → Demographics of California (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portuguese_Americans_in_California&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Brazilian Americans in Los Angeles → Los Angeles (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Americans_in_Los_Angeles&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * History of Mexican Americans in California → Demographics of California (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Mexican_Americans_in_California&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Cambodian Americans in Los Angeles → Los Angeles (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cambodian_Americans_in_Los_Angeles&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="African Americans in Memphis, Tennessee">African Americans in Memphis, Tennessee → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_Memphis,_Tennessee&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * African Americans in New Orleans → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_Americans_in_New_Orleans&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Indians in Atlanta → Indian Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indians_in_Atlanta&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Chinese Americans in Atlanta → Chinese Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_Americans_in_Atlanta&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * History of African Americans in St. Louis → African Americans (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_African_Americans_in_St._Louis&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I think that these redirects should be deleted to encourage article creation, as the current targets have relatively little to say about the locations in these various redirects. signed,Rosguill talk 23:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I think we can retarget Chinese Americans in Atlanta and Indians in Atlanta to Demographics of Atlanta, and African Americans in Washington, D.C. to Demographics of Washington, D.C.. - Eureka Lott 00:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I recall that a few years back, I had participated in some discussions like this one, but I cannot recall what the redirects were named, so I cannot find the discussions. I do recall though that Tavix was involved in them, I believe. Maybe Tavix recalls the names of the redirects more than I do so that the consensus formed in the previous discussions can be known. Steel1943  (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Are you thinking of the Hinduism redirects? That one was bunch of redirects from "Hinduism in location" to a target that did not explicitly discuss Hinduism in that location. The first discussion was a trainwreck, but smaller batches yielded consensus to delete unless a suitable target was found or content was added. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Yep, that was it, and the consensus there seems to make sense for any "(person or person concept) in (geographic area)" redirect. I may not get around to sorting through these, but it seems that at the least, EurekaLott's comment falls in line with this. Steel1943  (talk) 23:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete History of Mexican Americans in California and History of African Americans in St. Louis at the least: These redirects seem to be slightly different than the rest of the redirects in the nomination, and are overly-precise to a point where I cannot foresee there being a proper target for them. Steel1943  (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry to make this an official trainwreck. I found decent places to retarget several of these. A few have acceptable locations to retarget:
 * African Americans in Washington, D.C. → Demographics of Washington, D.C. (ht Eureka Lott)
 * Portuguese Americans in California → Portuguese Americans (consider this weak—there's enough scattered coverage, though we're basically asking readers to string together their own article)
 * Brazilian Americans in Los Angeles → Brazilian Americans
 * History of Mexican Americans in California → History of Mexican Americans (not unlike the Portuguese problem above, but much more substantive coverage)
 * Cambodian Americans in Los Angeles → Cambodian Americans
 * I'm genuinely conflicted about the Memphis and New Orleans ones. Both are very significant centers of African-American culture and population, such that retargeting to the city articles could well serve readers. There's a WP:REDLINK case to be made, though it can be inherently difficult to write about what's historically a majority population (e.g., German Americans in Wisconsin).
 * To make things even more confusing, I still favor deleting the following, but there's just barely enough coverage that I think it's worth other editors doing a look-over:
 * Vietnamese Americans in Los Angeles → Vietnamese Americans. It gives Los Angeles the metro area with the greatest concentration, but still lacks substantive coverage of the population there.
 * African Americans in Wisconsin → Wisconsin. Two sentences give the topic in a nutshell, but it's very bare-bones.
 * I agree that the others should be deleted due to lack of substantive coverage anywhere. With respect to Eureka Lott, I don't think Demographics of Atlanta does the job for Chinese or Indian populations. --BDD (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: WP:INVOLVED relist to close old log day.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting following reversal of attempted article creations at two of the redirects in this discussion. Thoughts on the attempts?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jalen Folf   (talk)  16:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * What?? No, any building out of these into articles should always be encouraged. --BDD (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom, subject to these all showing very low usage (less than 6 pageviews per month in each of the previous 12 months) and there being no attribution history to preserve. No prejudice against someone re-creating select redirects where there is usage, or to creating applicable articles, though. --Doug Mehus T · C  16:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Consider closing those with consensus and relist the rest. I don't see a global consensus, and I barely see anything like a consensus on individual items. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  18:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No objection to a "no consensus/keep", "insufficient consensus but redirecting anyway without prejudice to reversal", or "soft delete/no prejudice against re-creating" for those pages with no attribution history and no non-discussion-related incoming redirects. No real opinion one way or the other as to what the best targets should be on individual items.  Some of the terms may be notable enough to be article-worthy. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  18:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FOSOROM
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Deryck C. 00:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * FOSOROM → Moldova (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FOSOROM&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I'm assuming that this is supposed to refer to "Former Soviet Republic of Moldavia", but I don't see any evidence of usage of this acronym. Delete unless a justification is provided. signed,Rosguill talk 16:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A search turned up precisely zilch. FWIW, a search for Фосором turned up nothing either. Nom's suggestion looks plausible - that this is an invented acronym along the lines of FYROM, which was a real thing. Narky Blert (talk) 20:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

25th Takavar Seperate Brigade of Pasveh
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 23:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * 25th Takavar Seperate Brigade of Pasveh → 25th Takavar Brigade (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=25th_Takavar_Seperate_Brigade_of_Pasveh&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Misspelling, should be separate. Don't know if the pageview count is enough to keep. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gamil Zirak
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 23:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Gamil Zirak → List of Middle-earth characters (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamil_Zirak&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at target article, and likely outside of the scope of the targeted list. The other two mentions I can find are a DAB page entry and a mention at Khuzdul, but the mention at Khuzdul is only in the context of a linguistics example. Nothing helpful there, and no history that would need to be saved per WP:ATT. Hog Farm (talk) 05:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not covered anywhere on the project. Lets be sure to clean up the DAB after this is resolved. BenKuykendall (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ashera
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Asherah. signed,Rosguill talk 23:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Ashera → Savannah cat (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashera&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete. Not covered at the target article. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Some previous discussion at WikiProject Cats. There was once some content at Ashera which was merged to Savannah cat, which explains the redirect, but it has since been removed from the target article. There are some indications the subject is a hoax/scam. There's been some minor news coverage, but there's not arisen a consensus, apparently, that the topic isn't just WP:INDISCRIMINATE trivia, much less that it's notable, so neither an article nor a redir seem sustainable at this time. PS: It could possibly be retargeted to Asherah as an alternative spelling, if it's actually attested as one, or maybe even as a misspelling. I would be fine with that outcome. PS: If it redlinked again, please WP:REFUND the merged-away version to User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Ashera_cat; if it comes up again with more sources, it would be good to not lose the original material and sources, nor the edit history.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Asherah and tag with R from misspelling. Hog Farm (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Asherah as R from other/misspelling; I don't feel strongly about which; it's an uncommon alternative. I found some New Age-type sources which I wouldn't give the time of day to; but also this book, by id:Daniel Hillel who has had a solid academic career (his Hebrew biography has more detail), published by Columbia University Press. Narky Blert (talk) 08:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft delete per can use WP:REFUND to restore the revisions and material. Per WP:NOTBURO, since he's asked for it, I would support move to User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Ashera cat without leaving a redirect. Doug Mehus  T · C  15:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.


 * Comment I do support, weakishly this RfD outcome, but since this closed as "retarget," I'm pinging in case they wanted to restore a previous diff to their userspace. Doug Mehus  T · C  18:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)