Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9

May 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 9, 2020.

CJ Thorpe
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  with the suggestion that disambiguation may be needed in future if substantial mentions of any of these potential targets actually come to exist on en-wiki. As it stands there does not appear to be enough content at any of the targets to actually satisfy any potential reader, with the non-trivial number of borderline-notable CJ Thorpes, the rough consensus here is to avoid pretending we actually have worthwhile coverage of any of them. The search results may be the best option. ~  mazca  talk 22:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * CJ Thorpe → Star Wars (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CJ_Thorpe&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at target article. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 17:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Disambiguate (1st choice), since this term is ambiguous (a |s Google search on the name reveals the first results are for a Penn State University football player, but I don't know if he's notable enough for an article, and it could also refer to the bassist of Bombay Monkey or possibly a writer of The Quietus (in which case his name is CJ Thorpe-Tracey) mentioned at Making a New World), weak retarget to Bombay Monkey as an (2nd choice; this is its bassist's name), super weak retarget to Star Wars (film) (3rd choice; a character by that name is mentioned there as the narrator of an early draft titled Journal of the Whillis), or delete (4th choice) if none of these work. On a side note, I had a classmate by that name back in high school. Regards,  SONIC  678  18:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Bombay Monkey per Sonic, as the ionly substantive mention in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 19:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as only a mention in the Bombay Monkey article, hardly any mention at Star Wars or the author. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom and AngusWOOF. CycloneYoris talk! 23:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 21:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Teletherapy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23Teletherapy

Toyota 89CV
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . In the absence of significant information at the current or suggested targets, participants feel a redlink to encourage article creation is preferred. ~  mazca  talk 23:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Toyota 89CV → Toyota (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toyota_89CV&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This appears to be the name of a racecar that currently has no article. Propose retarget to Toyota 88C-V until (or if) an article is created. TheAwesome Hwyh  21:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - According to WP:REDIRECT and WP:REDLINK, if the article does not exist yet then we should not have a redirect to some place that doesn't describe it just to avoid a red link. Instead, the red link provides hints to potential editors that here is something that they can create with their knowledge of the subject. Since the redirect to Toyota doesn't actually tell you anything about the race car, the current redirect is actually giving you no information about it and hiding the invitation to write a proper article for it.  Stepho  talk 22:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. At this time, there's no good place to point this. If we had an article on the car, the correct title would be Toyota 89C-V. - Eureka Lott 03:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deep Depression
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Depression. (non-admin closure) feminist &#124; wear a mask, protect everyone 04:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Deep Depression → Tropical cyclone (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deep_Depression&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Deep depression → Tropical cyclone (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deep_depression&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Deep depression → Tropical cyclone (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deep_depression&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not sure what to do with this one. Mentioned at target article, but this seems to refer to Major depressive disorder and similar topics as much or more than it does for hurricanes. Hog Farm (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget per nom and add the for template there. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * "Deep Depression" is an official term used in classifying the intensity of tropical cyclones (see Tropical_cyclone), so the redirect should remain. However "deep depression" is not, and it would make more sense to redirect it to Major depressive disorder as suggested. Colonies Chris (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how Deep Depression and deep depression are both not an official term used in classifying the intensity of tropical cyclones, after all, they are the same thing. However, do we really need the redirects, I dont think so.Jason Rees (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Take a look at India Meteorological Department's Tropical Cyclone Intensity Scale. The capitalised forms are official designations with specific meanings. Whereas the uncapitalised form is just an informal description with no specifically defined meaning. Colonies Chris (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget as the usage medically is more important than the tropical cyclone one. Noah Talk 12:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I think they should both be redirected to Depression, which currently serves as a dab. I don't think we should have different redirects depending on capitalization. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget "Deep Depression" to Tropical cyclone scales, where there is a brief explanation about the official term used for tropical cyclones. And then Retarget "deep depression" to Major depressive disorder as the nominator suggests. CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 00:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree - this is an improvement on my suggestion above. Colonies Chris (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 21:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to DAB page Depression. The preceding discussion shows that the expression is ambiguous. It would be a very bad idea to have different targets for different capitalisations, which would land users randomly on different pages. Narky Blert (talk) 08:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Depression DAB per Narky Blert. Radically different targets for different normal capitalisations are worth avoiding, and this really seems to be reasonably used for a substantial version of either common meaning of "depression". ~ mazca  talk 23:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Depression per Narky and mazca. signed,Rosguill talk 23:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NeoCon
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Neoconservatism. signed,Rosguill talk 22:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * NeoCon → Merchandise Mart (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NeoCon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Is a trade fair that doesn't even have its own article a more plausible search term than neoconservatism? p b  p  21:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Retarget to neoconservatism. neocon already redirects to neoconservatism, and NeoCon could be a hypothetical alternate capitalization of the clipping for neoconservatism. Although this specific capitalization seems to be rare for neoconservatism specifically (after a brief Google search), it does receive some daily views (all pageviews mentioned are sourced from the Wikimedia Foundation Toolforge Pageviews Tool). Since January 2020, the redirect has received about 7 views per day, with no noticeable increase between March 17-20, 2020, which was the date range of NeoCon 2020's postponement and cancellation that received a fair amount of press (here, here, and here, for example). If most users were using the NeoCon redirect for the event, one would likely expect an increase during that time, although there does not seem to be any. Kʜᴜ'ʜᴀᴍɢᴀʙᴀ   K'''ɪᴛᴀᴘ (parlez ici)  13:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget  It appears to be a plausible contraction of neoconservatism and page views show that it is beating searched. Also, based on the fact that during the time the trade show was announced to be cancelled there was no change in page views it strongly indicates that it’s not the trade show that people typing the term meoVon are looking for.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 07:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget per the above and amend the hatnote at neoconservatism accordingly. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Supermarket News
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16%23Supermarket News

Akira Fubuki
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Akira Fubuki → Fubuki (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Akira_Fubuki&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

While there originally was an entry for Akira Fubuki at the target disambiguation page, the entry was simply circularly linked to this redirect, and does not belong on that page per WP:DABRED. I would suggest deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Not mentioned anywhere in English Wikipedia, and her Japanese Wikipedia article provides no evidence of notability. (NSFW, don't Google her name.) 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not mentioned in English WP. Circular redirects anywhere are a confounded nuisance, and ones to DAB page something more than that. Narky Blert (talk) 08:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Li Changgeng
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23Li Changgeng

Direxion
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Procedural close  I'm closing this despite being involved, as due to the creation of an article at this redirect, any discussion of the redirect is moot. signed,Rosguill talk 22:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Direxion → Exchange-traded fund (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Direxion&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, I would suggest deletion. I see that this was originally created as an article and then converted to a redirect by the same editor 5 minutes later; if need be, we can procedurally close this discussion, restore the article, and proceed to an AfD discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Why do you think deleting this would be beneficial? Benjamin (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * When a reader types the name of a company into Wikipedia's search bar, they should get some explicit information about that company, not be sent to an article on a general class of products that doesn't mention the company at all. At best this leaves the reader, who is probably coming to Wikipedia because they know little about the company and need an introduction from the very basics, to guess that the company does some kind of business related to this product (but what kind of business? provider? commentator? auditor?). At worst this leads to mistaken inferences (e.g. "the company offers only this type of product and no others"). Search results (Special:Search/~Direxion) are always more informative than such a redirect. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Retarget to direction à la inflexion. --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 08:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Close and don't bother with AfD restored the article below the redirect, and expanded it. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Direxion has arguably the most notable stable of ETFs on the market, with RS discussion almost every day.--2601:444:380:8C00:E8D5:BE09:A38:7DE6 (talk) 08:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Benjamin (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pribyslavitz
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23Pribyslavitz

10 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%2310 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight

HMS Javelin (F12)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="HMS Javelin (F12)">HMS Javelin (F12) → HMS Kashmir (F12) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Javelin_(F12)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Redirects to HMS Kashmir, but there's no indication, either in that article or in the top google results, that the Kashmir was ever named Javelin at any time, or that any such entity as "HMS Javelin F12" ever existed.

There's another Javelin (HMS Javelin (F61)), and "HMS Javelin" alone redirects to her. It's a problem because searching on "HMS Javelin" brings up both the real Javelin and this redirect to Kashmir in the search results, and its confusing. If and when sourced material is written into the article showing that the Kashmire was ever named Javelin, then this redirect can be recreated, and possibly HMS Javelin made into a disambig page. Herostratus (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Herostratus (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I believe that the two ships swapped names while under construction, but I don't enough of a possibility of confusing the two to warrant a redirect.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. In any case, a redirect to an article that doesn't then explain why you're there is confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fooball
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 14:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Fooball → Football (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fooball&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible typo - see this and this. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Update: this could easily be confused between Football, Foosball, and Gooball. CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Or is it “im-pausable”? However, the linked discussions were about its use in disambiguators and other context while this is the single word itself. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * But this was created after the above discussions were made. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 21:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. In fact it should be speedy deleted per its recent creation. Can be easily confused with Foosball, so it’s misleading and unnecessary. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 20:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Plausible typo and redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Per the previous RfDs linked, but part of me does think that it is somewhat plausible. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per CycloneYoris.— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 05:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, tentatively – it is slightly ambiguous but should be used enough to outweigh that ambiguity. Hardly implausible; there's even this. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 05:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Ambiguous misspelling (foosball, football or gooball?), redirect created (possibly WP:POINTedly having regard to recent discussions here) on 9 May 2020. Narky Blert (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambiguous misspellings have no value. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as ambiguous (though it's slightly more plausible as a misspelling for football than for foosball). – Uanfala (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - not needed, ambiguous. GiantSnowman 15:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 20:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and is subject to WP:XY (Foosball vs Football). If you really want to keep the redirect, then consider disambiguating it, but it is not that useful. --Soumyabrata talk contribs subpages 04:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:XY --DannyS712 (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

⋾
<span id="⋾"> <span id="⋽"> <span id="⋼"> <span id="⋻"> <span id="⋺"> <span id="⋹"> <span id="⋸"> <span id="⋷"> <span id="⋶"> <span id="⋵"> <span id="⋴"> <span id="⋳"> <span id="⋲"> Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16%23⋾

Planck rotational inertia
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was already speedily deleted  . (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Planck rotational inertia → Planck units (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck_rotational_inertia&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Planck specific heat capacity → Planck units (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck_specific_heat_capacity&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Planck thermal conductivity → Planck units (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck_thermal_conductivity&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Planck torque → Planck units (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck_torque&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Planck electrical conductivity → Planck units (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck_electrical_conductivity&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible redirects created by Ahri6279 who is globally blocked CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

V*
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23V*

Ford
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was procedural close.  Wrong forum: this is a move request. - Eureka Lott 17:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Ford → Ford Motor Company (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ford&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A common last name and plenty of notable people with this last name including Rob Ford and Gerald Ford 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Please review two previous move requests at Talk:Ford (disambiguation) – wbm1058 (talk) 02:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Anime and Manga
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23Anime and Manga

4-sphere
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . No prejudice against refining ~  Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 14:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 4-sphere → N-sphere (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=4-sphere&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Either refine to the section N-sphere or retarget to Five-dimensional space. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * My preference goes to N-sphere as the new target. Pichpich (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is, per WP:LEAST: A reader should not be surprised by the replacement of 4 by N, but most readers may be surprised to not getting the definition of a 4-sphere, and getting instead a technical specific property (there is no definition in the first proposed target; the second proposed target contains a definition, but it does not apply to 4-spheres that are not embedded in the five-dimensional space). D.Lazard (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as is. Like, I think the current target is less confusing that the proposed alternative. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, otherwise Retarget to N-sphere: It should definitely point to the N-sphere article instead of the 5-dimensional space article, since the former has much more information relevant to the properties of the 4-sphere (namely properties that are true for all n-spheres). Ambivalent about whether it should point at the section, with a slight preference for the general article per . — MarkH21talk 18:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jaime ellis
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  per WP:CSD <b style="color:red">King of ♥</b><b style="color:red"> ♦</b><b style="color:black"> ♣</b><b style="color:black"> ♠</b> 19:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Jaime ellis → Infidelity (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jaime_ellis&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

WP:R nonsense, unsure what this means or how it relates to the target. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 11:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - it looks like an indirect attack page.Ingratis (talk) 11:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is Jamie Ellis, but I think retargeting there is a bad idea, given the wrong capitalisation, different spelling, and the attack that would remain in the history. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete implausible typo and capitalisation error. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tagal, Indonesia
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Tagal, Indonesia">Tagal, Indonesia → Tegal (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tagal,_Indonesia&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="Tagal, Indonesia (disambiguation)">Tagal, Indonesia (disambiguation) → Tegal (disambiguation) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tagal,_Indonesia_(disambiguation)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I don't know if "Tagal" is a common misspelling for the Indonesian place (Tegal city or related Tegal Regency). If it is then Tagal, Indonesia can be kept. Tagal, Indonesia (disambiguation), however, serves no purpose. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It is not common to spell Tegal with Tagal --Tensa Februari (talk) 06:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Samsung Group
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) feminist &#124; wear a mask; protect everyone 04:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The Samsung Group → Samsung (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Samsung_Group&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * The Sony Corporation → Sony (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Sony_Corporation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely search term, we don't have similar formatted redirects like The Microsoft Corporation, The Google Inc., The Apple Inc, etc. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CHEAP, and tag as unprintworthy. Narky Blert (talk) 05:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, there are nothing wrong with these redirects. The fact that other redirects don't exist is irrelevant. I think The Microsoft Corporation would make a good redirect, but the Inc. ones don't make sense. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. - <span style="color:RGB(0,255,128); padding:2px">Flori4nK T A L K  02:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cortirion
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus  . signed,Rosguill talk 08:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Cortirion → The Silmarillion (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cortirion&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target article, delete unless justification and/or mention is provided. Hog Farm (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It's an early name for Valinor, so we could have a mention there if anyone thinks it worthwhile. Apparently it turned into the real town of Warwick. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 20:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 00:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Happineſs
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17%23Happineſs