Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 9

November 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 9, 2020.

Fraternity ring
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16%23Fraternity ring

Fraternity paddle
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16%23Fraternity paddle

Civil fraternal order
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Civil fraternal order → Fraternity (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civil_fraternal_order&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This phrase is totally unused on Wikipedia. Whatever a reader using it is looking for, it's probably something more specific. BDD (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I originally created this redirect as a replacement for a piped link in Phaleristics. Howevr, the entry was removed from the template some time ago, so the redirect is no longer necessary. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Commissioner of Justice
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Commissioner of Justice → Rivers State Ministry of Justice (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commissioner_of_Justice&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

"Commissioner of Justice" is a generic title. It is not specific to Rivers State. So, for example, I cannot add a wikilink from Aisha Dikko (Commissioner of Justice for Kaduna State) to Commissioner of Justice because it is redirecting to a different state. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:REDLINK. Note that European Commission has a Commissioner for Justice, when an article is written the two should be linked by reciprocal hatnotes. Thryduulf (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per redlink and Thryduulf BlackholeWA (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SM Storyland
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 17%23SM Storyland

LOL JK
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16

Wikipedia:MOSCOLOR
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Manual of Style/Accessibility. signed,Rosguill talk 22:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * MOSCOLOR → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:MOSCOLOR&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Should redirect to MOS:COLOR. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Manual of Style/Accessibility to conform with MOS:COLOR. Existed since 2007, but only 44 uses (so this won't do much in regard to existing links). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Regarget to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility to agree with MOS:COLOR, which I think it was the nom meant. If anyone cares about existing links, they can just be pipe-changed. But that would probably be a waste of time, because Wikipedia:Manual of Style is just a summary of the more detailed material at Manual of Style/Accessibility, anyway.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prey (2017 film)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Prey (2017 film) → Prey (2019 American film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prey_(2017_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

There is no 2017 film named "Prey". However, there is a game released in the same year with the same name, but I am not sure if we should retarget this page there, because I assume that there wasn't another film based on that game.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete no film was released under that name in 2017 and it’s a virtual certainty that someone looking for the game wouldn’t type that as a search term.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does not indicate why (2017 film) might redirect here, and I can see no other 2017 film with that title. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Upcoming redirects
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Prey (upcoming film) → Prey (2019 American film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prey_(upcoming_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="The Secret Garden (upcoming film)">The Secret Garden (upcoming film) → The Secret Garden (2020 film) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Secret_Garden_(upcoming_film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * <span id="Utopia (upcoming TV series)">Utopia (upcoming TV series) → Utopia (2020 TV series) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utopia_(upcoming_TV_series)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Those series are no longer upcoming. They were already released.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I doubt if anyone will query for upcoming series.-- <b style="color: red;">Georgia Army Vet</b> <i style="color: white;">Contribs</i> <b style="color: blue;">Talk</b> 17:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all as they all are no longer upcoming and moved already. — Young Forever <sup style="color: #2D68C4F">(talk)   17:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Make space for any future upcoming films or series. Narky Blert (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above. Why would they still be "upcoming" when they've already been released? They can always be recreated if other movie, TV show, etc. with those titles are announced. Regards, SONIC  678  16:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all as no longer upcoming. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bionicle in Japan
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Bionicle in Japan → Bionicle (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bionicle_in_Japan&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The article targeted doesn't even mention Japan. Dominicmgm (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, since given the current target "in Japan" is superfluous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jesus Cristo
<span id="Jesús Cristo"> Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16%23Jesus Cristo

Gesù
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16%23Gesù

Liberal constitutionalism
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20%23Liberal constitutionalism

The solar eclipse that takes place on August 21, 2017
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="The solar eclipse that takes place on August 21, 2017">The solar eclipse that takes place on August 21, 2017 → Solar eclipse of August 21, 2017 (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_solar_eclipse_that_takes_place_on_August_21,_2017&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

delete No longer likely to be used / wordy. Facts707 (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Plausible search term, just the mere fact of it being wordy is not enough to warrant deletion. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 08:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - No reason to delete. It's correct and unambiguous. Hog Farm Bacon 14:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, this redirect does seem implausible—not necessarily due to its length but it just does not seem like a natural search term to me. I feel like it is mainly due to the fact that the tense is incorrect now that the event has passed. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, implausible redirect, for several reasons, unused in wikipedia to be retained for hstory. Staszek Lem (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tavix. --BDD (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 21:50, 31 October 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Who is going to be searching like this three years after it occurred? Narky Blert (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Incorrect tense and about an event receding into the past. Jessamyn (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirect page only received a few amount of page views since April 2019. I mean, who even types this right now?  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per CycloneYoris and Hog Farm. "Unecessary" is not a reason to delete a redirect that is correct, unambiguous and harmless. Thryduulf (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unnecessary redirect, long after the fact, and incorrect tense too. Maybe this topic should be served by Google. Jax MN (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chapter 10: The Confrontation
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 22:13, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Chapter 10: The Confrontation → The Mandalorian (season 2) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chapter_10:_The_Confrontation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was a speculated title for the episode "Chapter 10: The Passenger". Since the title is incorrect, it is highly unlikely that people will actually use this redirect. Aoba47 (talk) 02:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Brojam (talk) 03:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Justarandomamerican (talk) 14:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Confrontation" is not mentioned at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --TheVampire (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Field of Aquatic Science
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The Field of Aquatic Science → Aquatic science (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Field_of_Aquatic_Science&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Very unlikely search term. I assume we normally avoid prefacing topics with such modifiers? (the planet of Mars, the holiday of Christmas...) - Would need a histmerge though if deleted. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget - agreed that Aquatic science is the more appropriate search term. The creator of the page and most contributions to the article is from a student editor, User:Dsarah15, and we should make sure their substantial contributions aren't lost in the merger, or are added back in at a later date to Aquatic science article. Jayzlimno (talk) 13:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I moved the student draft back to their sandbox and I will give them some feedback on how to proceed properly. Guettarda (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 01:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * What happened here? The history only shows it ever redirecting to the current target, so the "retarget" vote above doesn't make sense to me. But it also says the first edit removed almost 14,000 characters, which makes no sense. As an admin, I should be able to see deleted edits. --BDD (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * When you're in the history, click "View logs for this page" and it will take you to All public logs for the page. There, you can see that performed a history split to User:Dsarah15/sandbox. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 18:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * So given the above history split, my take is that it's safe to delete? I'd probably have ignored this redirect as harmless if useless, but at this point the discussion needs closure. signed,Rosguill talk 22:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete recently created, seems to have never existed in any form prior to 14 September 2020, and only very recently in its current form. Not common enough or old enough to warrant keeping.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  22:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 11:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Second inauguration of Donald Trump
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD  as the nominator is the redirect's creator. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Second inauguration of Donald Trump → Inauguration of Donald Trump (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_inauguration_of_Donald_Trump&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete, for obvious reasons. KidAd  talk  01:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Unless I'm mistaken, as User:KidAd is the creator and has nominated for deletion this should be speedily deleted? If not, delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, of course sam1370 (talk · contribs) 07:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * for future reference, if you want a page you created and are the sole significant editor of to be deleted you can just add to the top. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trent Sullivan
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . Consensus to keep the article for now although notability may be challenged via the usual processes. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  15:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Trent Sullivan → H2O: Just Add Water (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trent_Sullivan&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, based on a prior revision this appears to be the name of a child actor with a minor role in the show. Delete unless a duly sourced mention can be added. signed,Rosguill talk 15:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – Sullivan was definitely a recurring actor on H2O: Just Add Water: IIRC, he played Emma's little brother, and was in roughly a dozen episodes. I have no opinion on whether the redirect is worthy of keeping, but if it is, H2O: Just Add Water is the logical destination. If it's kept, I would suggest that Sullivan should be added to the 'Supporting' section at H2O: Just Add Water in some capacity (i.e. if not in the bulleted-list then in prose below the list). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Due to this discussion, Sullivan, and other family members of the characters, have been added (back?) to H2O: Just Add Water. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Its not clear that the recent inclusion of Sullivan in the target's text is actually DUE. signed,Rosguill talk 21:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 00:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment the name remains in the article at this point. If Rosguill or anyone else thinks it shouldn't be (for DUE or any other reason) then that should be discussed on the article talk page. Thryduulf (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - redirect was converted to an article some time ago now (30th Oct), so there's no need to continue this discussion (although I'm not sure the article would survive AFD). A7V2 (talk) 04:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Accept article. I think the right thing to do would have been for to have drafted an article underneath the RfD notice and not to remove the RfD notice. Nevertheless, the article is there now and is an acceptable alternative. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of hash
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . This is fairly numerically split between deletion (as unlikely, ungrammatical, and/or ambiguous) or as a retarget to Hash list. Given the only real elaborated argument for retargeting to Hash list is based on it containing "list of hashes" in the first sentence, I can't help but find that argument unconvincing - we're retargeting List of hash not List of hashes, which already targets a different page. Given this seems to have caused confusion via ambiguity in this very discussion, I can't help but find the argument that it's ambiguous to be the stronger one, and find the consensus leans that way. ~  mazca  talk 00:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * List of hash → List of hash functions (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_hash&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Hash has many possible meanings, and this strikes me as an unlikely way to look for the target. I suggest deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 16:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is ungrammatical and folk looking for the CS data structure would search for list of hashes, for which the redirect already exists. -- 19:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hash list which includes list of hashes in the first sentence. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete given that List of hashes exists. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget per AngusWOOF. Thryduulf (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Nom comment I'm opposed to the current retargeting proposal: Hash list is a data type that stores hashes (that will generally all be produced using the same function) whereas List of hashes is a list of hash functions used to generate the hashes used in a hash list. I still think deletion is the way to go, but I think keeping the status quo is preferable to the retarget suggestion. signed,Rosguill talk 21:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 00:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as ambiguous. I'd be expecting to be looking at a list article about cannabis resin ("hash" in British English). Narky Blert (talk)
 * Retarget to Hash list per above.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak retarget to Hash list. I don't envy the closer here, hence my taking myself out of consideration! I can definitely live with either outcome here. I don't see anything else this would refer to, but it doesn't seem super helpful, especially with List of hashes available. --BDD (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.