Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 20

September 20
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 20, 2020.

Pimpala
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Pimpala railway station. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Pimpala → Chevrolet Impala (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pimpala&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The page was originally created as a joke article and subsequently redirected in 2007. The title is a non-notable slang term for the car and an implausible search term. There is apparently some link between the name "Pimpala" and Reynella, South Australia, but nothing of the sort is mentioned in the latter's article so retargeting there may not be workable. --Sable232 (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pimpala railway station. The current target may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget per Shhh; seems like the right home for this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 12:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pimpala railway station per Shhhnotsoloud -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New India
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was move  New India (disambiguation) to the redirect title. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)


 * New India → Premiership of Narendra Modi (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_India&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention in target (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment New India Assurance is responsible for the vast majority of uses of "New India" that are a specific thing, but I'm unsure whether it is ever abbreviated to just "New India" or if it is just a partial title match? Thryduulf (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or Retarget per Thryduulf; I see no evidence that the current target is appropriate. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move New India (disambiguation) to the base title. If the Modi campaign slogan ever meets WP:DABMENTION, it can be added there. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move per 59.149.124.29. New India was created as a one-sentence article, which then ended up at AfD, with the discussion resulting in turning it into a redirect to the current target. That's difficult to justify as the target article makes no mention of the slogan (it doesn't now, and it didn't at the time of the AfD either). I don't think there's anything useful in the history, so New India (disambiguation) can simply be moved over it. – Uanfala (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move New India (disambiguation) to the base title per 59.149.124.29 and Uanfala, "New India" can refer to anything on that page. Better to do this than redirect somewhere it's not mentioned. Regards, SONIC  678  23:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move the disambiguation over the redirect, there does not seem to be a primary topic. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move disambiguation to base title per the above. There is no clear primary topic for New India. SSSB (talk) 07:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The dwindles
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The dwindles → HIV/AIDS (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_dwindles&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

An internet search suggests that this term can refer to any patient, generally elderly, who is slowly dying from an illness, not just AIDS. I would suggest deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 18:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the phrase is specifically used at History of HIV/AIDS, but if it has evolved per 's search, a deletion is probably more appropriate. -2pou (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, in addition to my internet search, according to my partner who works in medicine this has been consistently used to refer to the elderly. I did a Google Scholar search just now and can confirm that usage is pretty much exclusively used to refer to the elderly in medical literature, with usage even in articles that were published during the early years of the AIDS crisis ( here's an article from 1979 that uses the term in the context of dialysis patients ), although for whatever reason usage appears to have spiked in the 90s. signed,Rosguill talk 20:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butt shaker
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 27%23Butt shaker

SEAT León Sedan
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 18:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * SEAT León Sedan → Volkswagen Jetta (A7) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SEAT_Le%C3%B3n_Sedan&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The redirect should be deleted because the car model does not exist and is unrelated to the article it redirected to. Andra Febrian (talk) 15:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. There is no sedan version of the SEAT León, only hatchback and wagon, so the title itself is a misnomer. I can find no indication that SEAT plans to build a sedan. --Sable232 (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - It appears the redirect was created by the same user who added information to the Volkswagen Jetta (A7) article giving SEAT Leon Sedan as an alternate name starting in 2021, but this was reverted as no source was given. I can see some rumours about a new Sedan version of the Leon but these don't mention anything about it being based on the Jetta, apart from using the same platform, although the other body styles of Leon use this too, as do many other VW cars. Since these appear to only be rumours at the moment, and anything which could be confirmed should probably be on a SEAT Leon article, probably best to delete. A7V2 (talk) 02:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reverences
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Reverence. (non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Reverences → Deference (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reverences&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Better redirect to the disambiguation page Reverence. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget per nom. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 08:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mint jelly
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 27%23Mint jelly

Wikipedia:Too many cooks
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy essayify  . There is no objection to 's essay. I'll leave it up to them to carry through the proposed page move. (non-admin closure)  — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Too many cooks → Wikipedia:Consensus (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Too_many_cooks&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirects to a blurb of WP:Consensus that doesn't exist there aymore (and it looks like hasn't existed for quite some time). Probably best to just kill this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The text about "too many cooks" was added in September 2010 as an elaboration on advice that was already there. The whole bit (original advice + elaboration) was removed in January 2012  after a talk page discusion. This text is unlikely to be coming back, so the redirect is misleading. It's got just three incoming links, so there won't be a big loss if it were deleted. However, this looks like a topic that you'd expected us to have something about (though of course, not as part of the policies or guidelines). I've whipped up a short essay under the redirect, and if it is kept, then it should probably be moved to the full title Too many cooks spoil the broth. – Uanfala (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh hey, if you've already got an essay ready to go, then please feel free to either just leave it there or move it elsewhere and leave this as a redirect to its ultimate destination. I can't see how anyone would object to that. Thanks for looking into this and writing something up! –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 14:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Uanfala. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.