Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 3

September 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 3, 2020.

Homosexuality in the United States
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to LGBT in the United States. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 22:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Homosexuality in the United States → LGBT rights in the United States (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homosexuality_in_the_United_States&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I think it should redirect to LGBT in the United States, which covers a broader topic and discusses LGBT rights. — Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 23:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to LGBT in the United States per nom. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to LGBT in the United States per nom, which corresponds better to the title of the redirect. Regards, SONIC  678  00:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to LGBT in the United States since I doubt someone typing Homosexuality in the United States would be looking up rights specifically.--67.68.208.64 (talk) 03:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget per nom. I agree that the general overview article about LGBT is a more plausible destination for this than the subpage on LGBT rights in law. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cultural references in Pokémon
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Cultural references in Pokémon → Pokémon (anime) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_references_in_Pok%C3%A9mon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Cultural references in Pokemon → Pokémon (anime) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_references_in_Pokemon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

As redirects, there seems to be no appropriate place for these to target per WP:XY, given there is no appropriate information at Pokémon which these redirects could refer, and the titles of the redirects do not show exclusivity to Pokémon (anime), their current target which doesn't include such information either. The redirect Cultural references in Pokémon was previously an article which was deleted in 2006 per Articles for deletion/Cultural references in Pokémon (4th nomination), but then had its edit history restored in 2009. However, with all that being said, I am not seeing the content which was formerly at this title present in any Pokémon-related article, meaning the edit history should be safe to delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020 Singapore Grand Prix
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Singapore Grand Prix. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 22:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * 2020 Singapore Grand Prix → 2020 Formula One World Championship (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_Singapore_Grand_Prix&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I have no clue why this page redirects to the "2020 One World Championship" article. Seventyfiveyears at 19:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * To awnser the question directly. This redirects to its destination because the 2020 Singapore Grand Prix was supposed to be a round of the 2020 Formula One World Championship before it got cancelled due to COVID-19. This is made very clear within the article. SSSB (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to Singapore Grand Prix which tells the reader directly that it didn't happen and links to the season article for more detail, rather than them have to search through the season article to find mention of Singapore. Thryduulf (talk) 00:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't delete - the race will almost certainly not take place in 2020 so there is no chance of a stand-alone article. I'm indifferent between refining to 2020 Formula One World Championship or re-targeting to Singapore Grand Prix, but agree with Thryduulf that current target isn't ideal. A7V2 (talk) 01:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Singapore Grand Prix per Thryduulf. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PLpro
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * PLpro → Papain (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PLpro&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

A Scholar search suggests that PLpro stands for "papain-like protease", which is not equivalent to papain itself. It's not mentioned at the target. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 21:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete to encourage article creation. It does seem to be a protease that's been researched significantly because it turns up in coronaviruses, and other related ones like 3CLpro have significant articles. I don't think it's necessarily harmful to point it at Papain as it is at the moment (as the article does explain the mechanism) but it's not really all that helpful either, and while it's mentioned in several coronavirus-related articles it's not really discussed usefully anywhere else to retarget. ~ mazca  talk 12:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BERSATU Blackout
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21%23BERSATU Blackout

Mississippi Mudflap
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Mississippi Mudflap → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_Mudflap&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Nebraska Neck Warmer → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nebraska_Neck_Warmer&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Texas Tailgate → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texas_Tailgate&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Wrestler's Wig → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wrestler%27s_Wig&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Tennessee Tophat → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tennessee_Tophat&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Baldy McMullet → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baldy_McMullet&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mullet Masztalerz → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mullet_Masztalerz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Tennessee Tophat → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tennessee_Tophat&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Baldy McMullet → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baldy_McMullet&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mullet Masztalerz → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mullet_Masztalerz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Baldy McMullet → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baldy_McMullet&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mullet Masztalerz → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mullet_Masztalerz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mullet Masztalerz → Mullet (haircut) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mullet_Masztalerz&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Slang terms that receive hardly any use anywhere, falls within WP:RFD #8 as novel or obscure synonyms. Hog Farm Bacon 15:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. We are not Urban dictionary. Besides, "Texas Tailgate" appears to be a chili sauce. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, per WP:RGUIDE, unchallenged RfDs should be closed as delete after seven days, instead of being relisted. This rule strikes a balance between giving interested parties a fair chance to comment (as AfD does for articles) and allowing uncontroversial deletion proposals to proceed without overhead (similar to WP:PROD). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Holler (film)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Holler (film)">Holler (film) → Dana Adam Shapiro (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holler_(film)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Film-title-to-director redirect for a film that entered the production pipeline a decade ago but appears never to have come out the other end as a completed film, and is not mentioned in the target article at all. The more serious problem is that a completely different film of the same title, by a different director, premiered this year -- meaning that a person who wants to find the 2020 film will get badly confused and misled by this (in fact, there's already an inbound link expecting the 2020 film). If I could find evidence that the Shapiro film had ever actually come out at all, then I'd just move this to a new title that added the year of release to the disambiguator -- but I can't find any such evidence, so deletion is the more appropriate response. Bearcat (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the nom suggests, this is ambiguous, and confusing without a mention. Without prejudice to its re-creation as an article about a future film. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Midnight Raymond Chandler
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11%23The Midnight Raymond Chandler

Chandler (occupation)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep the one with the useful disambiguator  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * <span id="Chandler (occupation)">Chandler (occupation) → Chandlery (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chandler_(occupation)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Chandler (profession, candles)">Chandler (profession, candles) → Chandlery (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chandler_(profession,_candles)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I'm not sure if the most appropriate target for these redirects is Chandlery or Candle. They should probably both go to one or the other. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: ambiguous and implausible anyway. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep because currently Chandlery discusses Chandlers. — Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 17:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Chandler (occupation). What's ambiguous or implausible about it? The article Chandlery is clear about the origin of the term and the current use. The article Candle uses a piped link to target Chandlery. On the other hand, delete Chandler (profession, candles) as an implausible search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to Raymond Chandler
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget all except The Midnight Raymond Chandler (which will be separated into a new nomination)  to Raymond Chandler bibliography. (non-admin closure)  Steel1943  (talk) 17:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Spanish Blood → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Blood&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Pickup on Noon Street → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pickup_on_Noon_Street&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Fingerman and Other Stories → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fingerman_and_Other_Stories&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Five Sinister Characters → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Five_Sinister_Characters&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Five Murderers → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Five_Murderers&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * The Midnight Raymond Chandler → Raymond Chandler (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Midnight_Raymond_Chandler&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Various topics (probably works) that are not mentioned in the target article, leaving readers searching for these terms left with finding no such information. Steel1943 (talk) 16:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Retarget all (except The Midnight Raymond Chandler) to Raymond Chandler bibliography, where they're mentioned. - Eureka Lott 17:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That works as a blatant WP:BEFORE failure on my part. I have closed this discussion as so to ensure a WP:TRAINWRECK doesn't start. Steel1943  (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The King of Burgers
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The King of Burgers → Burger King (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_King_of_Burgers&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

"Burger King" has neither any content nor mentioned anything about "The King of Burgers". Seventyfiveyears at 01:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Retarget to The Burger King per Google. Google seems to direct this phrase with the article and honestly the redirect would make more sense. Captain  Galaxy  20:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete since there is no mention of this ambiguous phrase in any Enwiki article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete since ambiguous. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence that either the chain or the mascot is known by this term.--67.68.208.64 (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Goosebumps: Slappy Halloween
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete "untitled", no consensus for the rest  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Draft:Goosebumps: Slappy Halloween → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps:_Slappy_Halloween&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Goosebumps: Slappy's Halloween → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps:_Slappy%27s_Halloween&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Goosebumps: Horror Land → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps:_Horror_Land&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Untitled Goosebumps sequel → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Untitled_Goosebumps_sequel&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Goosebumps: Horrorland → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps:_Horrorland&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Goosebumps Horrorland → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps_Horrorland&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Draft:Goosebumps: Haunted Halloween → Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Goosebumps:_Haunted_Halloween&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete Related to the nom. from yesterday, this is an example of the mess that results when out-of-date redirects are nonetheless kept in the draftspace, all of which target an article that was itself never in the draftspace! (though I am fine keeping the now-title-matching Draft:Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween in spite of that). UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete all per nom since these were created as redirects to existing articles. (And for what it's worth, I do not believe this nomination is in any way similar to Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25.) 04:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ...After further investigation of these pages, all of these redirects are R from moves, and the content eventually ended up at Draft:Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween, which was redirected to Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween. Since these redirects at one point held content, but the content wasn't moved to the article namespace, I have no opinion on the redirects' fate at this time. Steel1943  (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Only that both sets resulted, in the first place, from in-draftspace moves: that was the only point I was trying to make by connecting them. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the "Untitled" one as it's plausible that title could be used for a future draft article about another sequel. Keep the rest as there is no benefit to deleting them - it is not plausible these will ever be needed for drafts about any other topic. Thryduulf (talk) 12:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Your "no benefit to deleting them" makes me think you spend very little time in draftspace maintenance, which depends heavily on Special:AllPages, a tool that has 1) no way to suppress display of redirects and 2) can only display 200 draftspace pages at a time. This means a draftspace maintainer has to scroll past page, after page, after PAGE, containing mostly redirects similar to the ones above, before finally reaching a draft page needing maintenance such as Draft:Gopi Einstein (The Scientist). UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a reason to develop alternative tools and/or improve the ones we currently have rather a justification for deleting redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You and I both know that will never happen. I'll take my work to a place less frustrating in en-wiki.  UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

06452017
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * 06452017 → Kent Hovind (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=06452017&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Apparently it's an inmate number, not a likely search term. Hog Farm Bacon 14:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It wasn't me. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 14:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That's what they all say. Narky Blert (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and consider WP:CSD. BiologicalMe (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not mentioned at target, and does not provide any information a reader is likely looking for when searching this up. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bare identifier numbers are unlikely search terms. Don't use redirects to implement a crappy, incomplete version of Wikidata. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wait, we don't have Category:Redirects from inmate numbers? UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete because the only inmate number anyone ever searches for is 24601. - TimDWilliamson speak 03:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2019–20 California energy crisis
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 10%232019–20 California energy crisis

Wading
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Wading → Swimming (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wading&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Wading and swimming are not the same thing. With only two rivers, I can't find enough entries to justify converting this to a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * All I could find are WP:PTMs, sort of: Wading River (a dab), the redirects Wading pool and Wading bird (not to be confused with Category:Wading birds). You would think this should be a subtopic of Aquatic locomotion, or at least an associated term, but there's nothing in that article specifically about "wading". – Uanfala (talk) 10:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, and there's Deep wading, for vehicles. – Uanfala (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: per Uanfala's findings and to encourage article creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This word is ambiguous and redirection to any target may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Spent a while looking through various locomotion articles, and can't find an appropriate extant target. In lieu of a page for wading being created (not sure what it'd contain beside from a definition, we could potentially add a new entry at Walking and redirect there? BlackholeWA (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation → Karger Publishers (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gynecologic_and_Obstetric_Investigation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Lemma not included in target. Hildeoc (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep one of the many journals and book series published by Karger, which are discussed in bulk. Deleting this one, or any other of the ~400 other redirects to Karger serves no purpose. It would also leave Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., Gynecol Obstet Invest, Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. and Gynecol Obstet Investig alive (the NLM and ISO 4 abbreviations of this journal), and single out this specific journal out of the entire Karger portfolio for no discernible reason. (&#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have a suspicion this redirect's existence is related to WP:CRAPWATCH. Steel1943  (talk) 19:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not. It's a redirect to Karger, because it's fairly standard practice to redirect lesser notable journals to their publishers. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Right, so it's the good crap instead of the bad crap. Steel1943  (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 07:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Might feel differently if this were part of a well reasoned bulk nomination, or was testing consensus for same, but per Headbomb, makes no sense as a one-off delete. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sketch Films
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 06:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Sketch Films → Len Wiseman (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sketch_Films&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete. Not mentioned in target article and potentially ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I created this redirect in 2018 as a replacement for a piped link in 2012 in film, in connection with the film Underworld: Awakening, which Len Wiseman directed - presumably in association with Sketch Films, who are mentioned in the film's article as a production company, though no explicit connection is made between the company and Mr Wiseman. Colonies Chris (talk) 15:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 16:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I suppose. All title case matches in wikipedia are related to Len Wiseman's production company (external ref).  I added a sentence that Sketch Films is his production company. -2pou (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep since mention has been added to the target. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Invest 99-L
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 10%23Invest 99-L

Creation vs. mainstream science in cosmology
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 16:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Creation vs. mainstream science in cosmology → Creation science (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creation_vs._mainstream_science_in_cosmology&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

not a plausible search term. jps (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete sort of an WP:XY; unlikely to be searched, as the nominator says. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.