Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31

March 31
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2021.

Aggregate concrete
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . No participation after two relists, which makes me think that the status quo is likely the preferred option. (non-admin closure)  CycloneYoris talk! 00:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Aggregate concrete → Construction aggregate (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aggregate_concrete&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Should this target Construction aggregate or Concrete (maybe the Concrete section)? This redirect has dual meanings, it could either be the aggregates used in the production of concrete, or it could be aggregates made from recycled concrete. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C)  23:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1234567890
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was disambiguate due to no consensus  . While the discussion numerically leans towards Arabic numerals as the best target, it's very clear from the amount of time this discussion has continued, and the many suggestions there are, that there probably isn't an unambiguous primary topic. I've drafted a disambiguation page covering the three suggested targets and will retarget  123456789 and 0123456789 to it. This will, at least, solve the problems of (a) these very similar targets pointing to different reasonable places, and (b) some messy hatnotes. I obviously invite further improvements to the disambiguation page, and if further discussion is needed about this in future, it can at least start from a more cohesive point. ~  mazca  talk 10:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * 1234567890 → Unix time (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1234567890&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

While this is described at the target, I'm pretty sure thet Arabic numerals is the primary topic. A hatnote might be added there, but I don't think it's necessary. This redirect gets well over a hundred monthly pageviews and might be confusing for many people. Note that also redirects to the proposed target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: While there is already consensus for retargeting, there is still some slight disagreement with regards to the primary topic.
 * Retarget to Pandigital number, where this redirect is mentioned. "123456789" also redirects to "Pandigital number". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seventyfiveyears (talk • contribs) 00:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget somewhere. The current target is clearly not the primary topic. I'm not quite convinced Pandigital number is either. Meanwhile, 0-9 and 0–9 redirect to Numeral system. All of these should be unified somehow. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Arabic numerals as the primary topic with second preference to Numeral system. I don't think Pandigital number is the primary topic. 123456789 should go to the same target as well. A7V2 (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Depending on which retarget option is the most popular, we could end up with 0123456789, 123456789, and 1234567890 going to 2-3 different targets. There seems to be a consensus against deletion and for retargeting, but we can do with more opinions on where to take the redirect.
 * Retarget to pandigital number, the correct place if we talk about this as a number, instead of as a string of symbols, and clean up the hatnotes there. —Kusma (t·c) 09:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Numeral system. Paul 012 brings up some points that I mostly agree with. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me!  12:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate There doesn't appear to be a clear primary topic to me, and there are three valid targets suggested above. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think someone searching this is intending to type out the set of Arabic numerals (either out of boredom or curiosity) instead of meaning this to be the number 1,234,567,890. Of course, where ever this ends up, please add or clean-up the hatnotes to the other valid targets. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Arabic numerals, in line with 0123456789, and point 123456789 there as well. It's a better target than Numeral system, which is much more broad. I mostly agree with Tavix, but really, it's hard to do more than guess what readers likely mean. Pandigital number is too specific to strike me as the primary topic. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 09:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I've reverted an earlier close. Because of the variety of opinions and the relevance for other redirects, this discussion could do with more input.
 * Disambiguate per 86 above. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think this because it points out the Arabic numerals and 0123456789 goes there as well. It is also a more specific one than Numeral system.Keresluna (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate per 86 IP and Mdewman6, where the three valid targets can be added as to avoid any sort of confusion. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 23:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Arabic numerals. Numeral system seems too broad, and Pandigital number seems like an unlikely intended target. signed,Rosguill talk 19:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roman equivalent
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 16%23Roman equivalent

Cylindricity
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Roundness (object). (non-admin closure)  <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 23:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Cylindricity → Cylinder (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cylindricity&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Cylindricity is a measure of how cylindrical an object is, but it isn't mentioned in the target article. The best target I found was Roundness (object), but it only mentions the term in the lead. There are also a load of articles on engineering tolerances that might be suitable targets, and an entry on wiktionary. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Nominator has proposed multiple possible suggestions without a clear indication of which they prefer.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  23:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget; I think Roundness (object) is the best option since it at least mentions the term and gives the general context. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cockmonger
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8%23Cockmonger

Glizzy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8%23Glizzy

A (internet meme)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  03:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="A (internet meme)">A (internet meme) → Hololive Production (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_(internet_meme)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No mention of memes at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 17:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: One of Hololive's talents, Gawr Gura, has a catchphrase "a" that became a meme. I personally don't think it's a likely search target especially when the Hololive article does not mention the meme at all. _dk (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is the sort of thing that makes me feel old, in that I cannot imagine how "A" is a catchphrase, and don't really want to find out. If there's no content related to the meme on-wiki, then the redirect isn't doing the thing that redirects are for and should be deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable meme. Dominicmgm (talk) 21:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Current Fractions
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Current Fractions → Splits and mergers Of Kerala Congress (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Current_Fractions&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

While this is the title of a section at the target, it's a generic phrase that does not necessarily refer to Kerala Congress. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as hopelessly ambiguous. There are probably literally a thousand or more things this could refer to. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as ambiguous, per above. I'm 90% sure this (and the title of the section it points to) is also a typo and is supposed to be "Current Factions", rather than "Current Fractions", as the article is about various political factions in the Kerala Congress. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 20:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I had the same thought. One more reason to just delete it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Ambiguous and misleading. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 11:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)">Arnold Hall (Hartwick College) → Hartwick College (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arnold_Hall_(Hartwick_College)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 16:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fine Arts Theatre
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 17:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Fine Arts Theatre → Stony Brook Southampton (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fine_Arts_Theatre&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, could conceivably refer to many different theatres. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 16:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paolino Recreation Center
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 17:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Paolino Recreation Center → Roger Williams University (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paolino_Recreation_Center&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on Wikipedia, delete unless a duly sourced mention can be added. signed,Rosguill talk 16:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

OpenStore
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 17:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * OpenStore → Ubuntu Touch (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OpenStore&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 16:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kinnies
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7%23Kinnies

Free Willie (Due South)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to List of Due South episodes. Hog Farm Talk 17:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Free Willie (Due South)">Free Willie (Due South) → Free Willy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Willie_(Due_South)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in the target article. I dunno what the disambiguator is supposed to mean. Is it a song? Dominicmgm (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of Due South episodes. It was the name of the second episode of the first season and it originally redirected to an article named Free Willie about the episode before it was changed into a redirect to the film article.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 16:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of Due South episodes per the 67 IP, which would help readers get to a better place than one with irrelevant info. Regards, SONIC  678  22:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fee willy
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Fee willy → Free Willy (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fee_willy&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible typo. I doubt anyone would miss the "R" from "free". Dominicmgm (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bum bum be-dum
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Bum bum be-dum → Disturbia (song) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bum_bum_be-dum&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I propose this redirect be deleted per #5 and #8 of WP:R and WP:NOTLYRICS as with Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28. Pamzeis (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I think I agree that it should be deleted,but not for the first two reasons in the nomination. LYRICS refers to content of articles, not redirects, and the other link is just a list of reasons one might delete a redirect, with no indication given which reason is germane in this case. It's generally helpful to be specific in a nomination about why a policy applies as opposed to just throwing out some shortcuts and assuming that makes a clear argument. All that being said, this is not a useful redirect, unless it was to go to a WP:DAB page (that at this time does not exist) similar to la la la. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. While redirects from lyrics can be helpful (especially if the title of the song is not in the lyrics), this is too ambiguous to redirect to a certain song. Dominicmgm (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stephen French (troll)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 15:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Stephen French (troll)">Stephen French (troll) → Lorraine Higgins (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_French_(troll)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Mr. French is a non-notable living person who was convicted of threatening and harassing Lorraine Higgins. "Troll" as a parenthetical disambiguator seems like a BLP violation to me (though some newspapers have described him as an internet troll). I suggest deleting this and replacing it with something like Stephen French (criminal). Cheers, gnu 57 13:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete If he's not notable on his own I don't see good reason to have any sort of redirect at all.Beeblebrox (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

(East Lancs) British Citybus
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 15:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="(East Lancs) British Citybus">(East Lancs) British Citybus → East Lancashire Coachbuilders (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=(East_Lancs)_British_Citybus&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible search term <b style="color: black">Night</b><b style="color: black">fury</b> 09:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete; unusual format makes it somewhat confusing and unlikely to be useful. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geodreieck
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 15:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Geodreieck → Set square (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geodreieck&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This is the name of a set square produced by a German company. The target of the redirect was a section of Set square that was removed as blatant advertising. So, the only occurrence of "Geodreieck" in En WP is this redirect, which must be deleted either. D.Lazard (talk) 08:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Basically per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Incompetent valves
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8%23Incompetent valves

Put to the sword
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 8%23Put to the sword

Podarke (polychaete)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Oxydromus. signed,Rosguill talk 20:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Podarke (polychaete)">Podarke (polychaete) → Polychaete (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Podarke_(polychaete)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

redundant and misleading. Redirecting wrongly. Correct Podarke (genus) Estopedist1 (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * obviously, you're right, and I think you would have been justified changing it without starting a discussion first 😊—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * sorry, I wasn't clear enough. Podarke (polychaete) should be deleted. No point to keep it--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * oh, I see. That sounds reasonable to me.—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Oxydromus, correct and harmless. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 07:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I find it unlikely as a search term, but agree that it could be retargeted per the above comment, as the target article mentions the name. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget per J947. Old name for that, see also World Register of Marine Life. Hog Farm Talk 15:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sub Zero (roller coaster)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete.  apparent hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Sub Zero (roller coaster)">Sub Zero (roller coaster) → Six Flags Great Adventure (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sub_Zero_(roller_coaster)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was a fabricated claim by an editor who was later blocked. There was never a roller coaster announced or installed by this name at a Six Flags theme park. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a hoax. Dominicmgm (talk) 00:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eductor-jet pump
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7%23Eductor-jet pump