Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 8

May 8
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 8, 2021.

Kamagethi dynasty
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 21%23Kamagethi dynasty

Edward Budgen
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16%23Edward Budgen

Stagnated democracy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16%23Stagnated democracy

Veska
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16%23Veska

Grand Theft Auto 6
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 22%23Grand Theft Auto 6

Grand Theft Auto VI
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 22%23Grand Theft Auto VI

George Trebek
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 22%23George Trebek

Morai
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 22%23Morai

Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics → 2020 Summer Olympics (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solomon_Islands_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete redirect to encourage article creation Joseph2302 (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Both of these redirects were articles before being redirected by . So the nominator's rationale for deletion is rather flawed. Don't delete the redirect because that would be back-door deletion of an article. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The current redirect doesn't give any subject information, so red link is perfectly fine until someone wants to create a decent article. Which is likely to happen once some competitors from the country are qualified. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Restore the article in the page history per WP:BLAR. Thryduulf (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, redirecting individual country's participation articles to the article about the general sporting event is reasonable, especially given that the event has not yet occurred. Restoring the article only to send it to AfD and have it deleted, only to have it recreated in a few months seems like a lot of bureaucracy to little benefit. signed,Rosguill talk 18:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nauru at the 2020 Summer Olympics
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Nauru at the 2020 Summer Olympics → 2020 Summer Olympics (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nauru_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete redirect to encourage article creation <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Both of these redirects were articles before being redirected by . So the nominator's rationale for deletion is rather flawed. Don't delete the redirect because that would be back-door deletion of an article. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The current redirect doesn't give any subject information, so red link is perfectly fine until someone wants to create a decent article. Which is likely to happen once some competitors from the country are qualified. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Restore the article in the page history per WP:BLAR. This is without prejudice to AfD if anyone desires. Thryduulf (talk) 15:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, redirecting individual country's participation articles to the article about the general sporting event is reasonable, especially given that the event has not yet occurred. Restoring the article only to send it to AfD and have it deleted, only to have it recreated in a few months seems like a lot of bureaucracy to little benefit. signed,Rosguill talk 18:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 04:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deceased inventor
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus  .  ✗  plicit  14:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Deceased inventor → Inventor (patent) (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deceased_inventor&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This just strikes me as very unlikely search term. No incoming links at all, so it isn't used anywhere. Not mentioned in target article, and if someone was searching this, it is not a safe assumption that they were curious specifically about patent law. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If anything I think List of inventors would make more sense since I believe it’s more likely thy someone using this as a search term is looking for a list of dead inventors and since the list does mentioned the date of birth and death (if applicable) the list could be used in that way. At the very least it makes more sense than the current target.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of inventors per IP (is this our regular IP friend gone dynamic or is it a new one? I haven't been around here for a few days). Not a particularly strong retarget, but this does seem like something people could reasonably search, and the proposed location is much more intuitive. <b style="color:#000">Vaticidal</b><b style="color:#66023C">prophet</b> 06:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: The target article contains a discussion of the legal requirements for handling a patent application when an inventor is deceased. So the redirect makes more sense than it might appear. —&#8239;BarrelProof (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok so not completely irrelevant but I’m still confident that someone looking up patent requirements wouldn’t use deceased inventor as their search term.--67.70.101.238 (talk) 06:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, both the current target and the suggested redirect target seem less than helpful. signed,Rosguill talk 20:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Although there is not much at the current target there is a mention and reference. Without the plural unlikely that this would be expected to redirect to a list. Peter James (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 04:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kobe Jones
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 15%23Kobe Jones