Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 25

November 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 25, 2021.

Disney
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was wrong venue  . Do an WP:RM instead. (non-admin closure)  — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Disney → The Walt Disney Company (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Move Disney (disambiguation) here. Disney can have much other meaning than just the company. Aalaa324 (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose as the company is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tivetshall
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 3%23Tivetshall

Question Team
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 3%23Question Team

Non-canonical
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 14%23Non-canonical

Just One Person
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Snoopy! The Musical. (non-admin closure)  CycloneYoris talk! 07:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Just One Person → Only One Person (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Seems like it would be a better fit for Snoopy! The Musical, where a song of that exact title appears. It is also known for it's appearance on The Muppet Show, so it could also redirect there. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 11:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate, in which case a draft DAB will help. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate with a hatnote to Snoopy! The Musical (there's no mention at The Muppet Show). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Snoopy! The Musical - "Just One Person" is mentioned several times in the Snoopy page, unlike the Muppet Show. — curious  Golden  call me maybe? 08:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Common attributes
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  13:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Common attributes → Guṇa (Jainism) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Common Attributes → Guṇa (Jainism) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Left over from a page move, these redirects seem rather ambiguous to me and don't seem to be particularly strongly related to this religion. A few WP:BEFORE searches turn up all kinds of uses, by far the most common being related to programming and markup languages. I'm unsure what the best course of action is here. 192.76.8.95 (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC) <p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague at best -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kafirism
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  --BDD (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Kafirism → Nuristanis (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not actually mentioned at the target, which simply describes Kafiristan. A GScholar search suggests that kafirism is used in other contexts, a Kurdish movement in the late Ottoman Empire, and as a descriptor of a demographic of Trinidadian Muslims , both of which may be notable or at least potentially better covered at a different article. The redirect as it stands may even be a neologism in reference to the current target. As it stands, I think that deletion is best, although redirecting to Kafir would also be an improvement over the current target. signed,Rosguill talk 22:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC) <p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eel on Musk
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD.  Thryduulf (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Eel on Musk → Elon Musk (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Part of me was tempted to just R3 this, and another part of me was tempted to mark it as reviewed, so I come here instead without having firmly made my mind up. It's a meme with some currency but is far from widespread. It doesn't seem to refer to anything other than Elon Musk, so I'm not sure its existence is all too harmful. But on the other hand, it would be costly for us to maintain redirects for every silly variant of every public figure's name, not to mention getting into complicated BLP territory at times. I come down leaning deletion, simply on the basis that anyone searching this will already know who Elon Musk is, and thus can search his name spelled correctly after finding nothing at this title. (Half-joke/half-typo  doesn't exist but probably should.) --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 02:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Woah, I don't know that Redirects for discussion is a thing - turns out redirects are far more serious than I thought! In that case, I have no problem getting it deleted. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I enjoy memes but this is an obscure synonym at best. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Review/Message boxes
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . As there seems to be an explanation.  Jay (talk) 03:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Wikipedia:Review/Message boxes">Review/Message boxes → Wikipedia:Templates for discussion (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I don't understand why it redirect to TfD. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 00:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, outdated name for the venue. See Special:Permalink/13879634. Harmless; and deletion would only increase confusion. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's not clear to me from the history that this was ever used in practice to refer to TfD, but it's not harming anything, so keep. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 02:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's not clear for me either, but I'm not going to go on an full-fledged archive search. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment AFAIK, WP:Votes for Deletion was the venue for deleting templates before TfD and the other XfDs was set up -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per J947 and Tamzin. Huggums537 (talk) 01:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.