Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 11

September 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 11, 2021.

Peter Crowley
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Procedural close. RfD is not used for moving articles.  (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Peter Crowley → Peter Crowley (Gaelic footballer) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I propose that the redirect from Peter Crowley to Peter Crowley (Gaelic footballer) should be deleted. I intent to change the title of the article Peter William Crowley to "Peter Crowley", however, I cannot do so, as the redirect still exists. Peter William Crowley is notable as one of the world's longest hunger strikers, and I wish to change his page name to "Peter Crowley", as that is what he is referred to as in various documents, and in the media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jburke2005 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Close and create an WP:RM discussion at Talk:Peter William Crowley, per the top of WP:RFD: If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 02:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note (a) I've added the hatnote which should have been added to the foorballer page as soon as the hungerstriker page was created (if the move goes ahead a mirror image would be needed instead, on the hungerstriker page), and (b) there are a lot of incoming links which will need to be fixed if the footballer page is moved.  Pam  D  02:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural close per the IP above. Wrong venue to discuss the proposed moves. Note that the nom already boldly moved Peter Crowley (Gaelic footballer) from Peter Crowley, but this of course left a redirect, and now we have the base name as a redirect rather than at one of the potential primary topics. Ideally this move would be reverted and whoever closes this discussion would then start a RM for both Peter Crowley -> Peter Crowley (footballer) and Peter William Crowley -> Peter Crowley. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural close: use WP:RM. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of all Prize winners
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * List of all Prize winners → List of NATSIAA award winners (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

In January last year, moved the target page to a "more realistic title," since this one is pretty ambiguous as to what Prize it's meant to refer to. A Nobel Prize? A Pulitzer Prize? A Booker Prize? An International Johann Sebastian Bach Competition prize (the list of whose recipients has a title that's a partial match to this one, but retargeting there is questionable)? A prize for winning one's field day? Well, we don't really know for sure, and a Google search for the term brings up a lot of results unrelated to the NATSIAA, so we should delete this or retarget it wherever appropriate unless someone can provide a justification. Regards, SONIC  678  22:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - the term is too vague to be used as a redirect to anything. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 'Delete: sorry I didn't think to do so at the time, as it was a ridiculous title and is an equally ridiculous redirect. Pam  D  02:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete highly unlikely search term and in rare instances that someone may do so they wouldn’t be looking for the target article.--67.70.24.141 (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: The definition of "all Prize" is very unclear in this context. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 06:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (A-K)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts. signed,Rosguill talk 04:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (A-K) → List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (A–E) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (L-Z) → List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (F–K) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete as ambiguous whether (A–E) or (F–K). Sawol (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note that as one might expect these appear to be R from moves, but are not tagged as such. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Despite not being tagged as such, they are in fact s according to their histories. They get low pageviews but at least some. I think the best thing to do here is to key off of the first letter, so keep the first, retarget the second to List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts (L–P). (As an aside, I question whether we need a four-part list of largely redlinks, but that's not RfD's domain.) -- Tamzin  [cetacean needed] (she/they) 20:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of Royal Observer Corps / United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation Posts where one can find all of the lists. They are R from moves, so let's try to prevent any potential link rot. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Contemporary disco
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Contemporary disco → Post-disco (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, and apparently not a suitable common language redirect, as the target describes a subgenre that was prevalent from 1970s-1980s, and not a contemporary genre. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 14:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Contemporary disco" refers to contemporary disco, but the 1980s began forty years ago. I doubt that anyone looking for the contemporary version of a musical genre would be interested in reading about a trend that ended before a fair number of our readers were born. &#8213; Susmuffin  Talk 07:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete something that ended 35 years ago is not contemporary and there is nothing in the article to suggest that is was a well known alternative name for post-disco.--67.70.24.141 (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

International Iconic Awards
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * International Iconic Awards → Category:Indian television awards (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Lions Gold Awards → Category:Indian television awards (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target, not helpful to readers without a mention. Delete unless someone can think of a better target. signed,Rosguill talk 14:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete these cross-namespace redirects. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete One of these awards was deleted following an AfD. Also, keeping a cross-namespace redirect is not appropriate. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Life of the Party ( Australian film)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Life of the Party ( Australian film)">Life of the Party ( Australian film) → Life of the Party (2017 film) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Terra Nova ( 2008 film)">Terra Nova ( 2008 film) → Terra Nova (2008 film) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Tomorrow is Another Day ( 2017 Chinese Film)">Tomorrow is Another Day ( 2017 Chinese Film) → Tomorrow Is Another Day (2017 film) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * <span id="Sammohanam ( 2018 telugu film)">Sammohanam ( 2018 telugu film) → Sammohanam (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These four UNNATURALly formatted redirects were part of a mass nomination in danger of facing a potentially costly disaster on the tracks. They haven't gotten very many pageviews since their target pages were moved to their correctly formatted titles, and are pretty much search bar clutter because of this. Delete them unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC  678  01:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: We do not need to have a redirect for every improbable mistyping of a subject's name. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 07:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above reasonable. Sawol (talk) 07:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I am always right attitude
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 19%23I am always right attitude