Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29

September 29
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 29, 2021.

Joe gonzalves
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedily deleted,  attack page. —Kusma (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Joe gonzalves → The Jerk (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I am assuming this page was made as a joke... there is no reference to a "Joe" or "Gonzalves" in The Jerk, and same with google. Pointless redirect. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * G10 as an attack page (tagged). No evidence of this person ever having been involved in this film as far as I can tell. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iraqi terrorists
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 8%23Iraqi terrorists

Iraqi terrorism
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 8%23Iraqi terrorism

Cassy and Mavy Legaspi
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  03:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Cassy Legaspi → Carmina Villarroel (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Mavy Legaspi → Carmina Villarroel (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These are the names/nicknames of the children of the subject. I have removed those names from the target article per WP:BLPNAME, since there is no indication that their names are relevant to readers' understanding of the subject. While the names do live on in the title of a reference, I don't think that's enough of a mention to warrant redirects. Delete both. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also note that their father has an article as well so it's kind of strange to have them point to one parent anyways. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete given that neither parent's article is a better target than the other. That said, while the children might have been WP:BLPNAME low-profile persons as seven-year-olds back in 2008 when the article was created, they're certainly not low profile anymore; as adults they have chosen to pursue high-profile public facing careers, and removing their names from their mother's article was not the right move. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 10:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The important line of policy here is The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject. There was nothing in the article establishing their relevance to a reader's complete understanding. If you'd like to WP:BRD (preferably skipping the "R" for now to err on the side of BLP), I'm happy to discuss my action on the article's talkpage. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 05:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roku Netflix
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to List of Netflix-compatible devices. If someone wants to nominate one of these for deletion, then a separate RfD should be opened if needed. (non-admin closure)  CycloneYoris talk! 18:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Roku Netflix → Netflix (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * The Netflix Player by Roku → Netflix (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * The Netflix Player → Netflix (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Roku Netflix Player → Roku (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Netflix Player → Roku (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

These should point at the same target. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it's best to point to Netflix, which better explains the product development and also links to Roku. But only the ones with "Roku" in the title, the others are too vague and should be deleted. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 16:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * comment So the first Roku product and pretty much the first ever modern streaming player only played netflix and was discussed under this name in the media. Quickly after roku branched out and created it's channel store SDK. Pretty much its a forgotten footnote and history and shouldn't exist as a redirect any longer.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 01:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Some slight disagreement on where these redirects should point to…
 * Weak delete Roku Netflix per WP:XY and because there does not seems to be a definitive place to point it. Neutral on the rest. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 03:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget to List of Netflix-compatible devices. Those first entries look like what a reader using these terms would be seeking. I don't see anything at Netflix about this. --BDD (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:aqua 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 00:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Retarget all to List of Netflix-compatible devices per BDD; this seem to be the best way to point readers to the applicable content. Hog Farm Talk 01:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Christmas Isn't Canceled (Only You)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Hog Farm Talk 01:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * <span id="Christmas Isn't Canceled (Only You)">Christmas Isn't Canceled (Only You) → Kelly Clarkson (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirects to Kelly Clarkson. It is likely an incorrect title for the song "Christmas Isn't Canceled (Just You)". This version of the title is not mentioned in either Clarkson's article or the one for the song. I do not think this is a particularly helpful redirect and I doubt anyone will actually use this. Aoba47 (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any noteworthy sources using this incorrect name. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 03:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The general search should result in the correct title.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.