Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 6

July 6
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 6, 2022.

Closed operator
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 13%23Closed operator

Blackcomb (operating system)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Windows 7. signed,Rosguill talk 19:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Blackcomb (operating system) → Windows 7 (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

"Blackcomb" is not the codename for Windows 7 (this is mentioned in the page, btw), meaning the redirect is inaccurate. Additionally, the user creating it was blocked for creating vandalistic redirects. FMecha (to talk&#124;to see log) 17:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Windows 7. This is obviously a likely search term. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Headbomb. A pinpoint redirect to Windows 7 is more preferable, but I am wary to change it mid-discussion. I did bold "Blackcomb" in the text. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  19:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Refine: per Headbomb Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  03:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Retarget/Refine to include the section header, per above. Fieari (talk) 05:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paris, France/Musees/Louvre
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Paris, France/Musees/Louvre → Louvre (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No clear purpose. Unlikely search term. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk  17:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as is an unlikely search term. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 20:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as unlikely. Subpages in mainspace have been gone since forever. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mesablanca
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Mesablanca → SSX Tricky (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Delete - This is the name of a track in both SSX Tricky and in SSX (2000 video game). It also isn't mentioned in the article. Iffy★Chat -- 17:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not discussed at target and averages only about 100 pageviews a year since 2016. It's not a particularly likely search term and anyone looking for information on the track will only be disappointed. There is a nice fandom article on it. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  18:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as unhelpful due to unresolvable ambiguity. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Simoqî
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was soft delete  . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles .  ✗  plicit  23:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Simoqî → Kurdish tribes (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Hababa (Yazidi tribe) → Kurdish tribes (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on Wikipedia, delete unless a justification can be provided. N.b., the pre-existing articles at these titles were created by a sockpuppet of an editor CU-blocked several years ago, so they qualify for G5 speedy deletion and there is no need to restore the content. signed,Rosguill talk 16:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World Open Chinese Studies Journal
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 13%23World Open Chinese Studies Journal

American Society of Cinematographers Award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in an Episode Episode of a One-Hour Television Series – Commercial
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * <span id="American Society of Cinematographers Award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in an Episode Episode of a One-Hour Television Series – Commercial">American Society of Cinematographers Award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in an Episode Episode of a One-Hour Television Series – Commercial → American Society of Cinematographers Award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in an Episode of a One-Hour Television Series – Commercial (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The page was created at this title with a duplicate "Episode" in the title. It was moved 3 days after creation, so there isn't a huge concern about external links and there are almost no wiki-links. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 14:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing to preserve. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 20:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete delete per nom. I'm not sure people would search search for this duplicate duplicate in the title, as it doesn't appear to be correct. Regards regards, SONIC   678   21:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  03:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete very unlikely synonym -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not likely to ever be typed (given how long this name is). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Mahers
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Mahers. signed,Rosguill talk 19:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The Mahers → Middle East respiratory syndrome (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Originally a redirect to Middle east respiratory syndrome; currently a double redirect. This was very recently made an article via translation from de-wiki about a band; this edit was reverted and remade a redirect due to lack of notability, which I agree with, but then this redirect to MERS doesn't make sense. I don't see the connection between the Mahers and MERS. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 14:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The Mers people article was once at this title; when it was moved from Mers the redirect was not updated. Mers people now redirects to Mer (community), which was created later; the Mer article mentions Maher as another name. It looks like this is the only use; Mahers redirects to Division No. 1, Subdivision M, Newfoundland and Labrador as it's a place name there. Peter James (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Mahers. The quickly reverted article was about a band that's probably not notable (though there are some sources online, so it's not as open-and-shut as it may seem at first). The German article was created at about the same time and then got quickly deleted . Anyway, as pointed out above, there are two topics with the name on enwiki, and the small Canadian settlement is definitely not the primary topic.  I've turned Mahers into a dab page (preferable to redirecting to Maher as there's little overlap between the two sets of entries). The form with the definitive article may be more plausible for the ethnic group, but not definitively so. – Uanfala (talk) 23:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bhagavath Singh
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Bhagavath Singh → Bhagat Singh (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was tagged for speedy deletion to make way for the film article Bhagavath Singh (film), however the redirect creator didn't think it appropriate for the film title to be moved to the title. Bhagat Singh was not known as Bhagavath Singh, and there is no mention at the target, so it is unclear why the redirect exists. Jay (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 19:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.2em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 11:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No mention of Bhagavath at Bhagat Singh's article. The creator may have misassumed that the revolutionary's proper name was Bhagavath since Bhagat is a derivative from it. <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  17:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment as redirect creator. The nominator and I had a discussion about this at the redirect talk page. To pull out a couple of my points. The target doesn't mention Bhagavath Singh but the film article does. From Bhagavath_Singh_(film): "The film opened in December 1998 to negative reviews with a critic from Indolink.com stating that the film spoils the freedom fighter Bhagat Singh's name...". I will be honest and say I can't remember why I did create the redirect but it seems plausible that this film in some way biographical and so therefore redirecting to the primary topic makes sense. If someone could find reviews or even just a plot summary that would likely clarify whether it is unrelated or not. Tassedethe (talk) 18:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete and move Bhagavath Singh (film) to page. Different names, no reason to have it redirect to the freedom fighter. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  18:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Female pseudohermaphroditism
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Pseudohermaphroditism.  ✗  plicit  03:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Female pseudohermaphroditism → Intersex (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

male pseudohermaphrodism redirects to pseudohermaphroditism and this to intersex, why don't both redirect to the same target? — Tazuco   03:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pseudohermaphroditism per nom. Common sense solution. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  18:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pseudohermaphroditism: per nom Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  03:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pseudohermaphroditism per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Getty Museum, J. Paul
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 13%23Getty Museum, J. Paul

Template:Redirect si
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . signed,Rosguill talk 19:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Template:Redirect si → Template:R to plural (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Template:R si → Template:R to plural (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Appears to be a shortening for "singular", but easily ambiguous: R from singular or R to singular? The latter is actually even significantly more common. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No opinions on merits of the abbreviation, but this format without a or  describes what the redirect is (i.e. a ), no? I mean I see the ambiguity, but, , , etc..  J947  † edits 08:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks, means I was just confused because of R section, but that can only go in one direction anyway. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't like either the abbreviation or the lack of to/from. One has no transclusions, the other 4, so its hard to make the case that either are used with any regularity. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  03:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as confusing, and not necessary since the target "R to plural" is short and descriptive. Unless WP:RCATs have a default convention of one of "from" or "to" if not mentioned. Jay (talk) 02:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Wayback
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom.  Nom has withdrawn below as this is the wrong venue, and started a new discussion at Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 6. (non-admin closure) A7V2 (talk) 06:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Template:Wayback → Template:Webarchive (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

is not nor ever was compatible with. A redirect will create either breakage or unintended results. If instances of get imported from other wikis or old diffs, the correct action is a red error message [missing template] so they are fixed, not hiding problems behind redirects. A lot of work was done to get rid of years ago when  was created, we had 100s of thousands, bringing it back from the dead is a bad idea for a couple reasons. Green C  00:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * @GreenC Are you sure this discussion is in the right place? Wayback looks like it's a substitution only wrapper template, rather than a redirect? 192.76.8.85 (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Ahh that would explain the weird output when wrapped in the RfD template. I've rolled back the request Special:Diff/1096677605/1096697329 and requesting to Withdraw this RfD. -- Green  C  03:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Now at Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 6. -- Green  C  03:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Unencyoclopedic
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Template:Unencyoclopedic → Template:Notability (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Similar to Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 5; this one also has a typo. Unused. Previously deleted as a template at Templates for discussion/Log/Deleted/October 2005. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 20:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Ambiguous and a whole 0 transclusions. C LYDE (TALK) @PING ME! 23:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete for lacking a suitable target; a topic or article text could be considered unencyclopedic for a whole raft of reasons (poor formatting, WP:NOT, etc.). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.