Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 5

April 5
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 5, 2023.

Yanny\ or\ Laurel
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 17%23Yanny\ or\ Laurel

Shah Pahlavi
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13%23Shah Pahlavi

Chichan
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Chichan → Chechnya (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Does not appear to be an alternative name for Chechnya; internet and Google Scholar searches did not return anything relevant. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,Rosguill talk 21:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I assume this is an implausible typo of Chechen (which is a dab, so retarget there if not deletion)? { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 00:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete google search says that this is a vulgat Spanish word for sex so unlikely synonym. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. This does appear to be an alternate transliteration, see for example (bottom of page 6) and the tweet embedded in, but it is uncommon. More common in search results are people's names and a musical artist, none of whom seem to be notable. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Singa Penne
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was soft delete  . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion .  ✗  plicit  01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Singa Penne → Zee Tamil (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target or List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India); is mentioned at a number of different actor biographies, but in the absence of a clear primary target among them, deletion seems like the best option unless a due mention can be added to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India). signed,Rosguill talk 21:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Missing Zee Kannada programmes
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13%23Missing Zee Kannada programmes

Thanthu Vitten Ennai ( Tamil TV Series)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanthu Vitten Ennai ( Tamil TV Series) → Zee Tamil (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at the target or List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India), delete unless a duly-sourced mention can be added somewhere. N.b. the disambiguator includes two typos, but these are minor and can be resolved if there's a consensus other than deletion for the unerlying concept. signed,Rosguill talk 21:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as malformed modifier -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jorge Medina Estévez
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Jorge Medina (cardinal).  Jay  💬 15:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Jorge Medina Estévez → Jorge Medina (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The target is not known by this name. &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Jorge Medina (cardinal): the more likely target. &#8209;&#8209;Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget per above: This is the intended target of the redirect. Jorge Medina (cardinal) was moved from Jorge Medina without the numerous redirects corrected to lead to the intended target now at a different name. All of these still link to Jorge Medina:

Each of these should be retargeted to Jorge Medina (cardinal). Randi Moth TalkContribs 21:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Jorge Cardinal Medina Estevez
 * Jorge Cardinal Medina
 * Jorge Arturo Medina Estevez
 * Jorge Medina Estevez
 * Jorge Arturo Augustin Medina Estévez
 * Jorge Arturo Agustín Medina Estévez
 * Jorge Arturo Agustín Medina
 * Jorge Arturo Medina
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Christian Cxatria
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep.  Per WP:SK, withdrawn by nom. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Christian Cxatria → Roman Catholic Kshatriya (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This redirects to Roman Catholic Kshatriya. I searched for this expression on Google and found nothing except in text originating from Wikipedia itself. So I strongly supposed this phrase was made up by the user who created the page, and has no real use elsewhere. 176.159.12.72 (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As I said at the Teahouse, I did a Google Books search for Cxatria and learned that it is the Portuguese word for the Indian varna (caste related) Kshatriya, and that it is used in Portuguese books about India. There are 20 million Catholics in India and their history for the past 500 years is intertwined with Portuguese colonialism in India, which continued until 1961. The former Portuguese colony of Goa, now the most prosperous state in India, is 25% Roman Catholic. This is not a made up phrase, although admittedly obscure. Cullen328 (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep My mistake. It quite makes sense indeed. 176.159.12.72 (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SDNY
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was disambiguate  .  Jay  💬 15:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * SDNY → United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

My experience researching and writing about "SDNY" indicates it (far) more commonly refers to United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, that is, the Manhattan federal prosecutor's office, and I recommend re-targeting there. soibangla (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Southern District of New York, which has over 200 incoming links, and S.D.N.Y., which has over 100, should be considered with this discussion as well. May need disambiguation between the court and the prosecutor who brings cases to that court. – wbm1058 (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate – Searching the name up, it doesn't seem like there's an overwhelming primary topic, though the attorney's office does seem to be more common as the meaning than the district court. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York is also a possible target (if I'm understanding the attorney's office page right), though with far less usage than either the attorney's office or the district court. S.D.N.Y., however, does seem more likely to have the district court as the primary topic, as it's the official way to write it in case files and most news articles just use "SDNY". Randi Moth Talk<sub style="margin-left:-20q;">Contribs 23:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate to all the uses -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 03:53, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have created a draft DAB page. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UEFA Euro 2032 qualifying
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Jay  💬 17:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * UEFA Euro 2032 qualifying → UEFA European Championship qualifying (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * UEFA Euro 2036 qualifying → UEFA European Championship qualifying (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * UEFA Euro 2036 → UEFA European Championship (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON, same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Also not mentioned at target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per WP:CRYSTALBALL. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete too soon. Pelmeen10 (talk) 10:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: this redirect violates WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTALBALL. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 12:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Raat Ka Khel Saara
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13%23Raat Ka Khel Saara

2050 Formula One World Championship
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Jay  💬 08:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * 2050 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2041 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2030 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2029 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2028 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * 2027 Formula One World Championship → Formula One (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

WP:CRYSTAL. Same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – Absurd redirect, doubt there will be any opposition. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 13:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment – Further, might I suggest the following redirects be added to this nomination: 2025 Formula One World Championship, 2027 Formula One World Championship, 2028 Formula One World Championship, 2029 Formula One World Championship, 2030 Formula One World Championship, and 2041 Formula One World Championship. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 13:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I would be ok bundling all but which would probably be best served by its own RfD or just be refined to Formula One as that mentions the 2025 season, which was a similar reason for keeping in the  at the RfD on it here. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 14:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I would also be ok with bundling all but the 2025 article. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have retargeted the 2025 redirect as you have suggested. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 08:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's rather probable there will be a 2050 Formula One World Championship, but not assured. We're not a WP:CRYSTALBALL and shouldn't assume a sporting event series will happen 27 years down the line. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 14:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTALBALL   -- Devoke  water  19:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete nom plus all mentioned by 5225C except keep 2025 Formula One World Championship (. Skynxnex (talk) 02:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:CRYSTALBALL. They 2020s one will probably happen, the one in 2050 may happen, but we have no idea yet, as it hasn't been confirmed. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 08:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all from 2027 onwards per WP:CRYSTAL. The 2025 redirect can go to the relevant section on the main Formula One article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Procedural comment: The last entry to be bundled was at 07:31, 6 April 2023‎ UTC, so this RfD may be closed 7 days past that timestamp. Jay  💬 17:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Billy Jones (1970s singer)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 16%23Billy Jones (1970s singer)

Windermere (town), Westmorland and Furness
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  .  Jay  💬 16:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * <span id="Windermere (town), Westmorland and Furness">Windermere (town), Westmorland and Furness → Windermere, Cumbria (town) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was created in error Devoke  water  09:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: Even though malformed, it's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible (well, an experienced editor used it) title. Pam  D  09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. -- Devoke  water  09:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well yes the ceremonial county of Cumbria still exists but the administrative county doesn't. Westmorland and Furness is a non-metropolitan county but not a ceremonial county which is why we use "Cumbria" if sufficient.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- <b style="color:#FFF8C0;background:#494"> Dr Greg </b> talk 12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pam and Greg. We don't require readers to be intimately familiar with our naming schemes in order to find the article they are looking for. This unambiguously identifies the subject and is plausible based on a superficial understanding of how we title articles so there is benefit to it existing and no benefit to deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Windermere, Westmorland and Furness (town)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  .  Jay  💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * <span id="Windermere, Westmorland and Furness (town)">Windermere, Westmorland and Furness (town) → Windermere, Cumbria (town) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was created in error Devoke  water  09:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible title. Pam  D  09:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. -- Devoke  water  09:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- <b style="color:#FFF8C0;background:#494"> Dr Greg </b> talk 12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pam and Doug. This is an unambiguous, plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alston, Westmorland and Furness
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  .  Jay  💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * <span id="Alston, Westmorland and Furness">Alston, Westmorland and Furness → Alston, Cumbria (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This was created in error Devoke  water  08:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible title. Pam  D  09:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. -- Devoke water  09:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- <b style="color:#FFF8C0;background:#494"> Dr Greg </b> talk 12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pam and Doug. This is an unambiguous, plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ronald you idiot
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted  as a G10 by . (non-admin closure) <b style="background:#f5b836;color:#d12b1f;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Pizzaplayer219</b>Talk<sub title="C" style="margin-left:-22q;">Contribs 16:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Ronald you idiot → Apple Inc. (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Based on a Google search, I can't find any relation between this redirect to Apple, Inc. I can find some use of it in fan stories related to Harry Potter, but nothing about Apple. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   07:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * redirect creator here: it is in fact a very funny jab at Mr. Roland Wayne Georgemoody  12:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't appear to have been an appropriate redirect creation based on the above comment by the redirect creator... Hey man im josh (talk) 13:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: WP:G10 the entire purpose of this redirect, as admitted by the creator is a jab at Mr. Ronald Wayne. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 02:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10: This is a blatant attack redirect created on April Fools' Day. Even aside from that, any redirect with a mere 8 search results would be deleted if it was brought to RfD. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10. Clearly an attack redirect, I have tagged it for speedy deletion. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Poorest Countries List
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  .  Jay  💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Poorest Countries List → List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Move without redirect to the sentence case form; it will look better in Search, as it won't appear to be a title or other proper noun. An anonymous username, not my real name 00:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Creating a new redirect in sentence case is a cleaner solution than what the nom proposes. Although I don't think it will look better in Search applies any longer, with Vector 2022?  J947  † edits 01:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I suppose that is a problem mainly unique to me, as I still find legacy quite useful for browsing redirects and I prefer its general appearance. A new redirect would be fine. An anonymous username, not my real name  03:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect created at sentence case title . Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a plausible search term for the target in any plausible capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plausible search term. Even if it isn't in the case used by Wikipedia article titles, people will still search for this (on average, 48 people a month have done in the last year). <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Love Gov
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Salvio giuliano 08:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The Love Gov → Mark Sanford (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I propose the deletion of this redirect. A Google search for "The Love Gov" requires going through pages of results to find Sanford (Andrew Cuomo is the most common reference, followed by Robert J. Bentley). This redirect has been viewed only 10 times in the past 365 days and is not linked from any article. The redirect has no edit history other than its creation in 2009. The term is not even mentioned in the target article. OCNative (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, vague -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 03:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: vague and not mentioned at the target. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 12:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fox Noggin Channel
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Salvio giuliano 08:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Fox Noggin Channel → Nick Jr. Channel (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

The name that this redirect implies has never existed, and I find it odd as it combines the names of two completely different networks. Not to mention that this redirect was created by a sockpuppet who was indefinitely banned, over a decade ago, which makes me surprised that this redirect is still up. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete this reeks of children's TV spam and probably could/should be speedied. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as unlikely synonym at best. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: the redirect has no use and is not plausible. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 12:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).