Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 3

March 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 3, 2023.

Euphytica
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . There is a consensus that Euphytica should not be mentioned at the target article. signed,Rosguill talk 20:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Euphytica → Springer Science+Business Media (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Essentially goes against WP:REDLINK to a target so impossibly vast no specific information about that journal will ever be there. See also similar discussion in the past here and here and here. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment You've really dug for something of mine to delete haven't you.


 * Euphytica is unusual. It dates from 1952 and is one of Springer's oldest. Certainly this is one of the most Template:R with possibilities and may be appropriate for Springer Science+Business Media. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * "You've really dug for something of mine to delete haven't you." what in the world are you even talking about? I saw a redirect that made no sense, I nominated it. Get off your high horse, whatever it is. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as there is not even mention of this at the current target. A7V2 (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If there is a reliable source, I can add mention to the target. Springer's own history from 1945-1992 does not mention this journal, nor does the history of any other years. Springer has a page on Euphytica though. Some sources I found (this and this) appear auto generated. Jay  💬 10:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Euphytica is not a journal that should be mentioned on the Springer page. It's one of literally tens of thousands of Springer journals. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note that this has nothing to do with the merits and is in stead a continuation of a protracted Special:History/Agriculture in California personal harassment problem. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's got zilch to do with that. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Those must be autogenerated. A secondary source which is not autogenerated showing high regard for the journal: . Invasive Spices (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That's an argument for Euphytica having it's own article, not being a redirect to Springer. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Right. Any source that corroborates . Jay  💬 07:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It ain't. Springer started back in 1842. There's little that's peculiar about Euphytica that relates to Springer. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Garuda (upcoming film)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Salvio giuliano 09:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Garuda (upcoming film) → Garuda (2022 film) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

No longer an upcoming film. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 18:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ( Seems you stumbled on one of many more "upcoming" redirects I was going to nominate in the future, but might as well get this one knocked out.) Steel1943  (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: previous RfD discussions have indicated that these sorts of redirects should be deleted. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 19:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, and what about Garuda (2017 film), Garuda (2018 film) and Garuda (2020 film)? It's no longer a 2017, 2018 or 2020 film either. Unless it really is a 2017 film and not a 2022 film. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Precedent is to delete these types of redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Intergenerational ethics
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25%23Intergenerational ethics

Hypnozoite
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Apicomplexan life cycle.  Jay  💬 09:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hypnozoite → Plasmodium (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned at target; should probably be retargeted to an appropriate anchor at Apicomplexan life cycle as with the other terms mentioned there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It is mentioned at the target. Nonetheless agree. Retarget per 1234qwer1234qwer4. It's an Apicomplexan life stage, not a specifically Plasmodium stage. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wo Long: Final Dynasty
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11%23Wo Long: Final Dynasty

Template:Station-stub
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 17%23Template:Station-stub

Ram Nagar
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Ramnagar as an unopposed retarget proposal. (non-admin closure)  CycloneYoris talk!</b> 06:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Ram Nagar → Ramnagar, Barabanki (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

See the dab page at. Is this place in Barabanki with a population of 12,416 really a proper WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Ram Nagar"? I notice a reference to "Ram Nagar" in the article on Krishna Nagar, Delhi, but that's pretty clearly a reference to a different place. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Unless someone has a better idea, I suggest to retarget to  (which is a dab page). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fuck You Noah
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Noah Cyrus discography per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure)  <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 19:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Fuck You Noah → Noah Cyrus (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]
 * Fuckyounoah → Noah Cyrus (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Apparently a song by this artist, but with no mention at the target it could easily be mistaken as offensive/abusive to the subject. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Noah Cyrus discography where mentioned. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 03:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Noah Cyrus discography as it is mentioned there.  Ss  112   05:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Noah Cyrus discography per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Noah Cyrus discography per above. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Noah Cyrus discography. If a discography article exists it makes more sense as the destination than the artist themselves. I also tagged these with r from song. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:40, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lame man's terms
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Plain English. (non-admin closure)  <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 06:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Lame man's terms → Laity (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Deletion would probably be the best option for this strange and unambiguously unhelpful eggcorn. Wiktionary does have a small entry for it, but the number of searches is probably far too small to justify soft redirecting there. An anonymous username, not my real name 01:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment seems to be a misspelling of "layman's terms" ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 02:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of the etymology, but I don't see how a redirect is needed in this case. Anyone searching it is presumably trying to define the term, not learn about the concept of plain English. The fact that it's an eggcorn on top of that really makes me question its necessity. An anonymous username, not my real name  03:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Plain english as R avoided double redirect. Seems like a plausible term that could redirect to layman's terms since they sound similar. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 02:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Plain English . Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chaos carolinense
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25%23Chaos carolinense

Ketchup chips
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 17%23Ketchup chips