Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 6

July 6
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 6, 2024.

QTPOC
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 14%23QTPOC

Santjordia
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Santjordia → Jellyfish (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]
 * Santjordia pagesi → Jellyfish (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

Monotypic genus and species has no mention in the article. Better off as a redlink.

Also should blocked users be notified if their page/redirect is up for deletion? 115.188.142.52 (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:REDLINK -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per REDLINK. Plantdrew (talk) 20:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Regarding the question that depends. If their block will expire before the discussion is scheduled to end and/or there is an appeal pending, definitely yes. If the block will not expire for several months, it was an indef block placed a long while ago then generally it's not worth it but exceptions will apply. If all the indications are that they've left the project then it's of use only if an interested talk page watcher happens to spot it there and not elsewhere. Between the extremes it's a judgement call - the more recent the creation and greater relevance to their typical areas of interest the greater the likilihood of continued interest in the redirect which points towards notifying. However, don't spend too much time thinking about it - unless there is some explicit indication they don't want to be notified then err on the side of notification. Thryduulf (talk) 00:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kemosabe (Kesha album)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Kemosabe (Kesha album) → Warrior (Kesha album) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

This currently redirects to Warrior (Kesha album). Kemosabe is the name of a record label that put out the album, but the album article does not mention anything about it being a name for the album itself. The article history also raises concerns about WP:HOAX as shown here. I do not see any value in keeping this redirect as it does not seem like a plausible search term and per the above reasons, it is confusing and unclear. Aoba47 (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   05:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--NØ 07:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:VN
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  . Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 23:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * VN → Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Visual novels (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

Retarget to either Reliable sources/Noticeboard or WikiProject Vietnam. I would lean towards retargeting to RSN, considering WP:V/N links to it, but I can see an argument to link to WPVietnam. I don't see how an inactive task force should be the ideal target for this redirect. OzzyOlly (talk) 03:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Most of the incoming links are intended to go to the Visual novels task force. Breaking all of those links wouldn't be optimal. It has almost no utility, so a disambig page would not be useful compared to its maintance burden. Ca <sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">talk to me!  13:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Ca. I don't know the etymology of the WP:V/N → RSN redirect, but going by the stats it's far far less used than WP:RSN (|Wikipedia:V/N|Wikipedia:RS/N|Wikipedia:RSN ~10 monthly hits vs ~1500), so it doesn't look like a common source of confusion. Can't see a reason to change it, so keep. BugGhost 🪲👻 07:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe it means "verifiability noticeboard". OzzyOlly (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah of course - thanks <span style="border-radius:3px;padding:2px 3px;background:#ffc3b3;color:#552a2a;font-weight:bold;font-family:monospace">BugGhost 🪲👻 17:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate create a new redirect for Visual Novels WP:VG/VN -- the task force is inactive, so it is not a productive use of this redirect, for such a common abbreviation for Vietnam. The WP:SURPRISE of landing at an inactive TF, instead of the country WPP or a dab page is overwhelming. Replace all existing incoming links with the new redirect. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Similar disambiguation pages in WP-space include WP:PT (with WP:PT (disambiguation) redirect) and WP:1st (disambiguation), etc -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 20:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay  💬 19:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm not convinced that going back to change all the incoming links is worth it. The hatnote already takes care of people looking for WP:V/N or WP:VIET. I did create WP:VG/VN per the IP's suggestion though. Nickps (talk) 11:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It's also not possible for links in edit summaries. Those will be broken no matter what. Nickps (talk) 11:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Crows in popular culture
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 14%23Crows in popular culture

Stavros Kremos
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  01:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Stavros Kremos → Cyta (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

non-sense redirect InterComMan (talk) 11:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Presumably Stavros Kremos is a person somehow connected to the company, but as he is not mentioned at the target article, the redirect should be deleted. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   05:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Albumoftheyear.org
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  10:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Albumoftheyear.org → Album of the Year (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

I am not sure the website url redirecting to a disambiguation page which does not list anything related to the website is useful. There is nothing at the target page for people seeking information about the site, and it does not appear to be notable. <b style="color:purple">N</b><b style="color:teal">Ø</b> 09:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. The website was mentioned at the disambiguation page, but it was (appropriately) in April. - Eureka Lott 13:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not mentioned at the target. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   05:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Siddiqui
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15%23Siddiqui

Rajeshwari Vilas Coffee Club
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 15%23Rajeshwari Vilas Coffee Club

Raymoo

 * Raymoo → List of Touhou Project characters (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

raymoo hackery is a name generally only seen in shitposts, and i'd honestly be surprised if anyone not nose deep on every touhou rabbit hole knew about it. fittingly, not mentioned in the target, implausible as an actual search (unless you're me), and google gave me nothing reliable  cogsan (nag me)  (stalk me) 20:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Tentative Keep and tag as meme. It's plausible that someone finds one of said shitposts, doesn't know how the original name is spelled, and searches "raymoo" to find info on Reimu. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Tentative Keep. I personally believe that it is a genuine misspelling or respelling, but you would probably be hard-pressed to find a reliable source that mentions it being a meme or shitpost. Honestly, I don't even remember making this redirect in 2012, but I doubt that "Raymoo Hackery" ever crossed my mind since we would be discussing a "Raymoo Hackery" redirect as well. Regardless, the outcome doesn't really matter to me, so do what you may. — Nameless(?) 13:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * in your defense, it's funny  cogsan (nag me)  (stalk me) 12:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 07:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. I doubt Wikipedia would be the first place a person searching for info on Reimu would turn to. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   05:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:PDP
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to WikiProject Proposed deletion patrolling. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 23:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * PDP → Wikipedia:Protection policy (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ retarget] /[ delete]  ]

Hasn't been used in over a decade, and it's much more likely someone coming here may be looking for proposed deletion patrol. I recommend converting to disamb page.

P.S. I tried adding a 'redirect' hatnote over at the protection policy page pointing over to the PROD patrol Wikiproject page, but this was rejected by someone else, who suggested in the edit summary to "convert to disamb page" as it apparently hasn't been used since 2007. — <span style="background:#1F6295;color:white;padding:1q 5q;border-radius:10q;font-family:Franklin Gothic, Verdana">AP 499D25  (talk)  05:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Support. Everyone uses WP:SALT nowadays instead. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Retarget to WikiProject Proposed deletion patrolling per the nom's logic. The problem with disambiguating a shortcut is then it can't be used as a shortcut. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Retarget/Comment - I'm honestly unsure of what PDP is even supposed to stand for with regards to creation protection, and as such I'd support just retargeting it to proposed deletion patrol... but I'm worried about historical talk page links getting broken (such as in WP:ANI archives). There's not MANY pages using this shortcut... if we change this redirect (which again, I agree is generally a good idea) would it be against policy to go and update the old links for safety? Fieari (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * FWIW it stands for Protected deleted pages. Nickps (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Actually, yeah, retargeting to PROD Patrol Wikiproject would be even better than converting it to disamb page. This obscure shortcut to creation protection simply almost isn't used at all. I only said convert to disamb because that's what was suggested in the edit summary of the hatnote removal. For the like five uses of this shortcut on those 1.7 decade old archives, would piping the link (so it's ) work? That way the text is undisturbed but the link still brings you to the originally intended target. — <span style="background:#1F6295;color:white;padding:1q 5q;border-radius:10q;font-family:Franklin Gothic, Verdana">AP 499D25   (talk)  02:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).