Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 26

May 26
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 26, 2024.

Guzzle (Transformers)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Guzzle (Transformers) → Autobot (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Minor character in the franchise, not mentioned in target Rusalkii  (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete, since the lack of mention causes confusion. Ca talk to me!  23:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unless otherwise posted
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Unless otherwise posted → Speed limits in the United States (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target. Phrase does seem to be primarily used about speed limits in the United States and may make sense in the article, but is confusing with the article as is. Rusalkii (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * If redirected to speed limit in general, would that be better? Thanks WhyIsThisSoHard575483838 (talk) 01:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @WhyIsThisSoHard575483838 If "speed limit" actually talks about the phrase or concept, sure. The point is to not confuse readers who don't know what the phrase means. Rusalkii  (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete could refer to any standing order -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dezarae Kristina Charles
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Dezarae Kristina Charles → Adriana Chechik (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target. I think this is in fact her legal name, but The Daily Star is the only source I can find that mentions it at all, and she's clearly not notable under it. Rusalkii (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, basically WP:OR. BD2412  T 22:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sourcing is limited to tabloid journalism, inadequate for WP:BLPNAME purposes. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This redirect is part of a BLP violation, as the creator added the poorly-sourced name to the target article just after creating the redirect. The supporting WP:DAILYSTAR source for the addition was junk, and so the edit was reverted. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Parineeti Chadha
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Parineeti Chadha → Parineeti Chopra (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Another married actress who did not take her husband's name after marriage. This redirect should not exist. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is not compulsory for an Indian woman to adopt her husband's surname. Kailash29792 (talk)  03:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Katrina Kaushal
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Katrina Kaushal → Katrina Kaif (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Another married actress who did not take her husband's name after marriage. This redirect should not exist. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kiara Malhotra
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Kiara Malhotra → Kiara Advani (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Another married actress who did not take her husband's name after marriage. This redirect should not exist. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anushka Sharma Kohli
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  ✗  plicit  00:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Anushka Sharma Kohli → Anushka Sharma (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Another married actress who never took her husband's name after marriage. This redirect should not exist. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rani Mukerji Chopra
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3%23Rani Mukerji Chopra

Saskatoon berry pie
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Overwritten by draft  . (non-admin closure) Reywas92Talk 16:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Saskatoon berry pie → Saskatoon berry pie (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Want to delete this page because a draft for Saskatoon berry pie exists and needs to be published as a new article. NotactuallyaDJ (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You'd want to use WP:CSD G6 for that, I've tagged it for you. Rusalkii  (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * As an Template:R from Merge it cannot be G6 deleted, per WP:MAD, instead it needs to be histswapped which can be requested at WP:RM/TR. Ideally the draft would be submitted and an AFC reviewer would work through the process, though direct moves are permitted. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:FDB4:4BE6:CD87:98C2 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * responded to 's request at WP:RM/TR, suggesting that since RfD nom is the main editor of the Draft:Saskatoon berry pie, just copy over  edits to the article page. I agree with SilverLocust's suggestion as a WP:NOTBURO way of preserving the articlespace history while properly attributing edits first done in draftspace. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Functionally the difference is the same either way, as histswapping still preserves the history; simply at a new location that is easily tracked. Most straightforward would have been to get the draft accepted by AFC, but copying over directly has no attribution hazard in this case, and the draft can be redirected to the article anyway so all the history is still visible. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:3CF1:7704:B2A1:6109 (talk) 15:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment There was an article here until last month, when User:Reywas92 BLARed it. Instead of deleting to move a draft over, maybe the original article should be restored and possibly sent to AFD? - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * As a contested WP:MERGE it follows a separate procedure laid out at WP:MERGEPROP. WP:AFD is only needed for deletion, or redirecting without merging any content per WP:ATD-R. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:3CF1:7704:B2A1:6109 (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The draft's author can just restore the article with the content of their draft, which addresses my BLAR concerns. Reywas92Talk 16:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Fair, actually, so long as WP:CWW is followed anyone here can help move things along so I'll do that with a longer explanatory comment to follow. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:356C:F27A:B8A3:AC29 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment thinking this one over, in reality this is a contested merge combined with a bold rewrite. Hence the article should be restored while discussion is ongoing, it can be restored with the rewrite since bold rewrites are allowed, even while discussion is ongoing, and sometimes done in draftspace for convenience. To the end I've copied over the content to where it's permitted. User:NotactuallyaDJ can now withdraw this RFD nomination as moot and continue to work on the content. User:Reywas92 can start a discussion per WP:MERGEPROP to ascertain consensus on whether a merge is needed if they still want to. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:356C:F27A:B8A3:AC29 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IRC +10414
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3%23IRC +10414

Alia Bhatt Kapoor
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3%23Alia Bhatt Kapoor

Functional derivative(physics)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Nominator's block status became moot once others opined on the redirect.  ✗  plicit  00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * <span id="Functional derivative(physics)">Functional derivative(physics) → Functional derivative (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

I could nominate this for CSD per WP:X3 but the page history might be a bit too significant. It looks like a minor edit war happened where someone tried to create a page for something that already has a page. Delete as always. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 05:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RDAB: this is still an implausible search term even if it doesn’t qualify for WP:X3. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 13:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per above; the attempted article has nothing salvageable anyways. Ca <sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">talk to me!  14:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete it was an article in total for less than a day and as noted it doesn't appear to have any content work keeping.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Procedural close as a nomination by the sock of a good faith user who suddenly transformed into a problematic user, not waiting for the unblock decision and continuing with disruptive activities on different forums. I do not mind an editor in good standing renominating this. Jay  💬 11:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moon of the Spider(novel)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 2%23Moon of the Spider(novel)

24th Mixed Brigade(Imperial Japanese Army)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Nominator's block status became moot once others opined on the redirect.  ✗  plicit  00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * <span id="24th Mixed Brigade(Imperial Japanese Army)">24th Mixed Brigade(Imperial Japanese Army) → 24th Mixed Brigade (Imperial Japanese Army) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Can't be speedily deleted due to significant edit history, but it still falls under WP:X3 so I am nominating this here. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 03:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RDAB: this is still an implausible search term even if it doesn’t qualify for WP:X3. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 13:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete it was an article for a few days in 2007 and doesn't appear to contain any content not in the target.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Procedural close as a nomination by the sock of a good faith user who suddenly transformed into a problematic user, not waiting for the unblock decision, and continuing with disruptive activities on different forums. I do not mind an editor in good standing renominating this. Jay  💬 11:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

365(number)
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  . Nominator's block status became moot once others opined on the redirect.  ✗  plicit  00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * <span id="365(number)">365(number) → 365 (number) (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Can't be speedily deleted due to significant edit history, but it still falls under WP:X3 so I am nominating this here. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 03:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RDAB: this is still an implausible search term even if it doesn’t qualify for WP:X3. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 13:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete it was an article for a few hours in 2005 and doesn't appear to contain any useful content.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Procedural close as a nomination by the sock of a good faith user who suddenly transformed into a problematic user, not waiting for the unblock decision and continuing with disruptive activities on different forums. I do not mind an editor in good standing renominating this. Jay  💬 11:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RDAB. WP:ATTPs like nom's block say nothing about the merits of the redirect. Nickps (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBT rights in Zealand
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep  with a hatnote at the current target. (non-admin closure)  <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 08:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * LGBT rights in Zealand → LGBT rights in Denmark (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Zealand not mentioned in article. Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This is the sort of redirect where one would assume there's some grand complex history that explains how the redirect for "LGBT Rights in Zealand" got redirected to a page about a different nation on the other side of the planet. Nnnnnope. It was just... created that way, and the target page at the time had zero mention of-- waitthis isn't New ZealandKeep Oh OH OKAY THAT MAKES SENSE NOW. Zealand is the name of the large island that makes up about half of the country of Denmark. While it's not directly mentioned in the article itself, it does repeatedly reference Copenhagen, which... is on the island of Zealand.While it does possibly generate WP:SURPRISE for anyone who decides to abbreviate New Zealand to simply Zealand (which is wrong but hey, until a few minutes ago I didn't know where 'old' Zealand was), a hatnote at the beginning of the current target article would suffice, such as:This is about LGBT rights in Denmark, the country that incorporates the island of Zealand. For LGBT rights in New Zealand, see LGBT rights in New Zealand. ...which... huh. That's a red link. ...Could drive someone to make the article in question I suppose? Fixed link at 04:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Redirects are cheap. Denmark is not a federal country, so there's no reason to assume that LGBT rights in Zealand differ from the rest of Denmark. I like Lunamann's suggestion for a hatnote. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, and if we go for a hatnote, should we also consider Zeeland in the Netherlands (historically also spelled Zealand, and the namesake of New Zealand) as a possibility? Chaotıċ Enby   (talk · contribs) 15:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Given it's only one letter off from "Zealand", and we're already adding a hatnote mention for something that's an entire word off ("New Zealand"), I would say that adding a For LGBT rights in Zeeland, see LGBT rights in the Netherlands. to the end of the hatnote, after "For {blank} see {blank}" for New Zealand, would be warranted. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Sexuality and gender,  and Denmark. Nickps (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wich
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Disambiguate by history merging with wich (disambiguation)  * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...  00:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Wich → -wich town (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Having created Wich (disambiguation), I doubt that there is a primary topic of the term, and propose to move the disambiguation page over this redirect. BD2412 T 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Judging by the relative unnotability compared to the common -wich suffix, the existing page being a redirect to -wich town and keeping the existing hatnote on that page is fine. Just add a note at the top of wich (disambiguation) stating the primary topic. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The -wich suffix is still just a suffix, not the sort of thing someone would normally look for under the title without the leading hyphen. BD2412  T 14:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 02:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. Great job BD. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Retarget to the new Wich (disambiguation). -wich can remain targeted at -wich town, but that's because the hyphen matters a lot.  Without the hyphen it's entirely plausible that the searcher is looking for something else, and that there is no primary topic.  (With the hyphen it's less ambiguous, and there is definitely a primary target in that case) Fieari (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per Fieari - without the hyphen, this should point to the (new) DAB page. Walsh90210 (talk) 02:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move as per nom. It's a bit silly imo for the primary page to be a redirect to a "Topic (disambiguation)" page. Instead of targeting Wich to Wich (disambiguation) as per Fieari and Walsh, instead move the contents of Wich (disambiguation) to Wich, leaving behind a redirect from the disambig page to the 'primary' page. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Move (or WP:PAGESWAP) per nom instead of redirecting to avoid a WP:MALPLACED disambiguation page. - Eureka Lott 17:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate per all. Wich (disambiguation) is a page with 5 edits made by nom just before the nomination. Just merge it to the redirect page. Jay  💬 11:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd be fine with a merge, too. - Eureka Lott 13:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

NAAAP Pride Award
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete  .  Jay  💬 11:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * NAAAP Pride Award → NAACP (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Not mentioned in target. Rusalkii (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete as implausible typo. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is not the National Association of Asian American Professionals. <span style="color:#f80;font-family:'Cascadia Code',monospace">mwwv  converse ∫ edits  20:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Progressive political values
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;"> Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Progressivism. (non-admin closure)  <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 08:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Progressive political values → Progressivism in the United States (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Progressiveness is not an inherently US concept. Rusalkii (talk) 02:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Seems like no-brainer retarget to Progressivism to me. Ca <sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">talk to me!  14:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Progressivism per above. 〜 Askarion   ✉  22:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).