Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2020 October 17

= October 17 =

The state of quantum computing as of October 2020?
It is a practical issue for me. I have a patented project that requires parallel computing with hard to mention number of channels. Thus I've been looking into quantum computing. My understanding, acquired from a cursory reading, is that Microsoft and IBM have been able to implement quantum computers with a small number of cubits (5). It seems Microsoft has made them available as part of their Azure cloud computing system, IBM has now their own cloud. I wonder if anyone with better knowledge will review this issue for me in a few paragraphs. Thank you, will appreciate it. - AboutFace 22 (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You probably mean qubits not cubits. Nil Einne (talk) 02:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * So-called "quantum supremacy" (supremacy of quantum computing over "classical" computing) still has to be demonstrated convincingly; some sceptics think this moment may never arise. --Lambiam 14:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia vs Wiktionary
The Wikimedia Foundation is arguably best known for Wikipedia which is and has been so popular. I wonder why Wiktionary didn't get as popular as Wikipedia. Interstellarity (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know if it's possible to answer that, but my guess would be that defining words is a relatively straightforward thing compared to creating an entire encyclopedia. As a result, there are several viable options to Wiktionary out there, many with immediately recognizable names, like Merriam-Webster and Oxford English Dictionary. As far as online encyclopedias go, Wikipedia was and is way ahead of everyone else in terms of sheer volume alone. Matt Deres (talk) 13:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Today Wiktionary scores an Alexa rank of 694, which is pretty high; only two online-dictionary websites (cambridge.org and merriam-webster.com) have a higher rank. I guess that in general people are more often motivated to look up content info on a topic than lexical info on a word. --Lambiam 13:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for answering that. I wonder what people usually use as a dictionary when they want to look up a meaning of a word. Interstellarity (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I use www.onelook.com which accesses 18,955,870 words in 1061 dictionaries in one go. 84.209.119.241 (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)