Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2014 August 16

= August 16 =

Law & Order Season 10 Episode 5: Justice
When the Cop shows a Fingerprint Report to ADA Andrew, the Report says that Dana Hagen's jewelry only has Max's fingerprint & Michael's fingerprint.

The report says that Steven's fingerprints weren't on Dana's jewelry. I believe that Steven's innocent for Dana's murder, but Is it Possible for Anyone to Believe that (Steven touched & sold Dana's Jewelry to Michael who Decided to sell Dana's jewelry to Max)?

Although the Cop showed Fingerprint Report to Andrew, did Andrew believe that [Steven killed Dana, Steven touched Dana's jewelry, Steven sold Dana's jewelry to Michael, & Michael sold Dana's jewelry to Max]?

Since the Cop showed Fingerprint Report to Andrew, did Andrew believe that Steven's innocent for Dana's murder?

Jack's saying that Steven's (death row conviction) helped Andrew become Judge, but if Andrew told Everyone that Steven was Innocent, then wouldn't Andrew become a Judge still?

Why did the Cop suddenly Grow a Conscience & Why did the Cop finally Decide to tell Jack the Truth about the Fingerprint Report at the End of this Episode?

Since the Cop told Jack the Truth about Fingerprint Report, is It becuz Andrew committed Perjury that Police never found Dana's jewelry?

After the Cop tells Jack the Truth, Michael pleads Guilty to both Murders & Jack refiles Charges against Andrew, but what does that mean? How come It doesn't show Andrew testifying Again?

Since Jack refiled Charges against Andrew, is it becuz Andrew was a Dumbass for Assuming that Steven was still Guilty or is It becuz Andrew knew that Steven was Innocent?(50.173.3.170 (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)).