Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2014 August 17

= August 17 =

A properties of acids and caustic alkalis
Does a microlife (germs, bacteria, viruses) been in the acids and caustic alkalis?--Alex Sazonov (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2014 (UTC) As I been knowing, the acid and excess acidic environment is been eating by them's.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Snottite. Wnt (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Acidophiles and alkaliphiles exist. Red Act (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I been suppose that, anyone chemical environment is been a biological!--Alex Sazonov (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Pretty much. See Extremophile.  Red Act (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The most simplest form of biological is been chemical-physical materia or not it been biological?--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * For a discussion of the simplest possible forms of life, see Abiogenesis. Red Act (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

I thinking that, a chemical oxides (химические окиси) and oxideis of chemical (химические окислы) are beening the absolute chemical environment.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * But so, the absolute chemical environment always had been a biologically properties and biologically specifications.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * These two sentences are hard to understand, mainly because the phrase "absolute chemical environment" doesn't make sense. But I presume the word "absolute" is a translation of "aбсолютный", which can also mean "perfect", and "perfect chemical environment" does make sense.  I.e., I think the intended meaning of these two sentences is something like: "I think that oxides are the ideal chemical environment.  However, the ideal chemical environment is a property specific to the organism."  Red Act (talk) 19:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I mean that, the absolute (ideal) chemical environment is been the zero biological, but of course it always had been a biologically properties and biologically specifications.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 10:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC) I think that, an oxides group is been the chemical environment of terminates biological, but not all chemical elements of oxides group made it.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I been suggest that, an oxides group consisted from this: окиси, окислы, закиси, закислы, углеродные перекиси, углеродные перекислы, but I don’t know how it’s translate in English, because I had not got a special English translate.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC) The list partly translates as "Nitrous oxide, oxides, nitrous oxide, закислы, carbon peroxide, carbon перекислы". 84.209.89.214 (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I suppose that, a sulfates and sulfides are not been included in oxides group, because they had been an alkaline ash in most cases, that’s why they always been an alkalis.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

can we ban him already? as did ruwiki 66.249.81.61 (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've proposed this on the talk page. Tevildo (talk) 23:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I’m sorry for my English! Did the chemical hydrolyzing of complex (implex) chemical substances been? I been think that, in Nature been only the chemical hydrolyzing of simple chemical substances.--Alex Sazonov (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Medical test result human error statistics
How common are test result errors in developed countries as a result of human error? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.149.21 (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking This book may be just what you are looking for. -- Jayron  32  01:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)