Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Set Nominations/Philosophy navigation

Philosophy navigation
From Release Version Nominations - #  Everything on this template deserves to be included in the philosophy section. This template has high standards and recieves a lot of debate regarding what makes it and what doesn't. Many of the articles on the template still require work, but the ones that are up to the proper quality standard should be included and those that are not should be watched until they are. - Atfyfe 19:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  - B class
 * 2)  - B class
 * 3)  - FA class
 * 4)  - B class, already vital article and CD selection
 * 5)  - B class, already a vital article
 * 6)  - FA class, vital article
 * 7)  - B/Start class
 * 8)  - B class
 * 9)  - B class, vital article
 * 10)  - B class
 * 11)  - Start class
 * 12)  - Start class
 * 13)  - GA class
 * 14)  - Start class
 * 15)  - CD selection, core topic, maybe B class?
 * 16)  - Start class, vital article
 * 17)  - B class article, vital article
 * 18)  - unreferenced, maybe B class, seems to already be 0.7 inclusion
 * 19)  - B class article
 * 20)  - Start class article
 * 21)  - B class article, seems to already be 0.7 inductee
 * 22)  - B class article
 * 23)  - Start class article, alredy included in 0.7
 * 24)  - B class, included in 0.7
 * 25)  - B class, in 0.7
 * 26)  - B class,
 * 27)  - B class, in 0.7
 * 28)  - B class, in 0.7

Discussion
The only two articles I would consider possibly keeping from inclusion are Coherentism and Foundationalism given their current status and the overlap between the two. John Carter 13:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)