Wikipedia:Request a query

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

This is a page for requesting one-off database queries for certain criteria. Users who are interested and able to perform SQL queries on the projects can provide results from the Quarry website.

You may also be interested in the following:


 * If you are interested in writing SQL queries or helping out here, visit our tips page.
 * If you need to obtain a list of article titles that meet certain criteria, consider using PetScan (user manual) or the default search. Petscan can generate list of articles in subcategories, articles which transclude some template, etc.
 * If you need to make changes to a number of articles based on a particular query, you can post to the bot requests page, depending on how many changes are needed.
 * For long-term review and checking, database reports are available.

Quarry does not have access to page content, so queries which require checking wikitext cannot be answered with Quarry. However, someone may be able to assist by using Quarry in another way (e.g. checking the table of category links rather than the "Category:" text) or suggest an alternative tool.

Redirects with Possibilities
Any way for someone to provide me a list from Category:Redirect-Class Green Bay Packers articles of redirects with possibilities (R with possibilities). Thank you! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * My first thought was WP:PETSCAN, but it looks like Category:Redirect-Class Green Bay Packers articles is on talk pages, whereas Category:Redirects with possibilities is on article pages. So yeah, will need an SQL query. Will see if I can whip something up. Testing note: 1994 NFC Wild Card playoff game (Detroit–Green Bay) meets the criteria and should appear in the result set. – Novem Linguae (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Got it. Here you go. query/84446. – Novem Linguae (talk) 19:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk)  @ 21:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

First edit
In 2013, I heard that about a quarter of newcomers' first edits were to create a page, and three-quarters were to edit an existing page. (My own first edit was to a Talk: page, which was a distinctly unpopular choice.)

For editors who made their first edit during 2023, is it possible to find out how many of those first edits were page creations vs editing existing pages, and which namespaces they happened in? I imagine a set of numbers like this: all adding up to 100% of first edits. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Lots of ways for this to go wrong. Consider deleted edits, and that there's no way to reliably tell where a page was when an edit was made to it (unless it's also in the page creation log, but that still means at least half the data is bad).  Also no way to tell which of two deleted edits with the same timestamp was actually earlier, but a user making a second edit in the same second as their first is going to be rare enough that we can just pick one.  Getting a list of users whose first edit was in 2023 is impractical; a list of users created in 2023 and have made at least one edit is at least close, so that's what I'm doing.  query/84486 should finish in about 15 minutes.  It may or may not be right - I haven't seen the results yet - but I've got to get to bed.  Will take another look tomorrow. —Cryptic 07:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hm, corrected query finished a lot faster than the obviously-broken ones I ran before (which is usually to be expected, but I didn't think the data would cache that well). Something's not quite right - there shouldn't have that row with the completely blank namespace and 52458 existing-page edits, for starters, and that one creating a page in the MediaWiki namespace looks really suspicious - but otherwise the numbers seem at least plausible. —Cryptic 07:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure I know why the blank namespace happened, should be fixed when it completes again. The first-edit-was-to-namespace-8 was at MediaWiki:Campaigns-event-discovery-survey-question. —Cryptic 08:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If we ran that for, say, last week, would that give us an estimate of how many first edits are being 'lost' or 'misplaced' due to deletion and moving pages? WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, I can run the numbers (query/84512), but I don't know how much to infer from the comparison with the longer time period. The only edits that are going to be 'lost' are ones that have been revdeleted or oversighted, and in most cases - other than, perhaps for copyvio revdels - that will happen pretty quickly after they're made.  I wouldn't care to guess how quickly a typical page gets moved between namespaces after creation, either. —Cryptic 08:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Does it only lose revdel edits, and not ordinary/whole page deletion?
 * A lot of deletions for WP:UGLY articles happen after draftification, and borderline articles often don't get draftified for a couple of weeks. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Just revdelled and suppressed edits. Everything about deleted pages and edits except for edit summaries and page text is in the public database replicas; accounting for those is most of why the query is as complex as it is. —Cryptic 10:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * So here are a few things I notice:
 * Last week, 4,754 newbies made their first edit on an existing page and 1,842 newbies made their first edit to a new page.
 * Last week, if your first edit was to an existing page, then about 90% of the time, it was to the [i.e., a page most recently in] mainspace.
 * Last week, if your first edit was to create a new page, then about 70% of the time, it was to the User: namespace and about 20% of the time, it was to the Draft: space.
 * Within the first week, about a third of User: space pages and a third of Draft: space pages get deleted.
 * In 2023, 342,087 newbies made their first edit to an existing page and 144,181 newbies made their first edit to a new page.
 * In 2023, if your first edit was to an existing page, then about 90% of the time, it was to the mainspace.
 * In 2023, if your first edit was to create a new page, then about 70% of the time, it was to the User: namespace and about 20% of the time, it was to the Draft: space.
 * Within the last 18 months, looking at pages created on the first edit during 2023, about a third of User: space pages and almost 95% of Draft: space pages were deleted.
 * Conclusion from last week vs 2023: If your User: space page is going to get deleted, it'll happen in the first week.  Draft pages are much more likely to get deleted, but it takes longer.
 * Within the last 18 months, only 1.6% of pages created as the account's first-ever edit were moved to the mainspace. 20% of those were also subsequently deleted.  One in 75 first-edit page creations are still visible in the mainspace.
 * Actual User: pages probably aren't meant to get moved to the mainspace, and the existence of these pages depresses the overall 'success' numbers. An unknown proportion User sandbox pages probably are meant to move to the mainspace, while others are probably meant to be used for test edits.  We don't have a good way to differentiate between these two types of user space contribution.
 * WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Within the last 18 months, looking at pages created on the first edit during 2023, about a third of User: space pages and almost 95% of Draft: space pages were deleted. - this is a shocking statistic but if I understand correctly it can't be taken at face value because the namespace is where the page is now, right? That is, 95% of drafts that were never moved to mainspace are deleted, which is explicable in terms of G13 (I assume the 5% is drafts less than six months old?) –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Joe Roe (mobile), all of the drafts created in 2023 are more than six months old at this point. There were probably one or two drafts that were a few hours short of being six months old when the query was run, so it's like 0.05%.  The 5% that have been retained were probably created later in the year and had an edit made (by anyone) since then.  For example, the 5% probably includes articles that were submitted to AFC in December, declined in January, and will be deleted – just not quite yet.
 * The namespace listed is the namespace in which either the page exists now (more specifically, at 30 Jun 2024 08:21:10 UTC) or where the page existed at the time that it was deleted (e.g., ordinary CSD or AFD, not revdel or OS/suppression – those latter ones are invisible to the query). WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Articles that are missing in another language
I'm hoping to get a list of articles that are tagged as being in WikiProject Climate change and that do not exist in the Japanese Wikipedia. Any help from the lovely volunteers here would be very much appreciated. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk &#124; contribs) 15:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This can't be done with a sql query - interwiki links aren't in the main database, and jawiki is on a different database server than enwiki. Someone more familiar with WP:PetScan than I might be able to get a result with it.  Also worth asking at d:WD:RAQ; they do have access to the interwikis over there, and I seem to recall there's a way to get at wikiproject ratings as well. —Cryptic 17:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * interwiki links aren't in the main database - aren't they in ? * Pppery * it has begun...  17:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Erm. Wow.  That's egg on my face.  I'm sure I've looked for them before, and had thought that table went away when language links were migrated to Wikidata.  Hang on. —Cryptic 17:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * query/84886. —Cryptic 17:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Amazing! Thank you so much Cryptic and Pppery! Clayoquot (talk &#124; contribs) 19:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Find pages removed from a category
Is it possible to find a list of changes to a category's members, that are older than RecentChanges? Asking for Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 5. — Qwerfjkl  talk  15:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure not, unless it was depopulated by a bot, or was old enough that you can find the cat page with the Wayback Machine. —Cryptic 19:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)