Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/53180 4


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

53180
FINAL (0/1/0); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 15:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

- A down to earth editor, my goal is to make articles clean, well-organized, grammatically correct, and especially concise. The amount of edits may be low-only because I preview articles multiple times before saving them. My biggest problem on Wikipedia is images; I am working on becoming better at that with the help of other editors.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: My one major intention is making sure Wikipedia is save from nonsensical editors.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions to Wikipedia are cleaning up articles and making them concise and organized. I like to take the most important information to the article and make sure that is what is the focus of the article is (i.e. either removing un-useful or integrating useful trivia sections into the article). Also, some information on one page may be better suited on another page, so I integrate information that is un-useful in one article and put it to use in a more fitting article.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have been in conflicts over editing in the past but I asked for help from administrative editors and other editors and the problems were either permanently solved or at least kept at bay. Conflicts have absolutely never caused me stress, of course it can be so mind numbingly annoying at some points, but at the end of the day it's just Wikipedia, and problems in Wikipedia shouldn't cause stress, so in a situation like that I try as hard as I can to fix the disturbance but if I can't I wait until the next day to see if the problem has been resolved.

Optional question from Elkman
 * 4. What has changed between yesterday's unsuccessful RFA and this one?

General comments

 * Links for 53180:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/53180 before commenting.''

Discussion

 * I'm sorry. The repeated addition of this RFA is pretty much trolling. Please desist and show more respect to this process and this work as a whole. Pedro | Chat  15:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Unfortunately, if you run for RfA this frequently, other users are likely to oppose as a reflex. You have just over 700 edits when I counted; this means that you've run for 4 RfAs in about 700 edits, which is a pretty short editcount interval between them, and I (and other people) will see no reason why anything would change enough over such a short time interval to affect your chances of being accepted as an administrator (especially as your previous RfA wasn't even borderline). I'd advise you to wait significantly longer before your next RfA attempt, or people are likely to continue with such reflex opposes in future RfAs without examining the situation. (But with only 700 or so edits, it seems unlikely that the community would consider you to have enough experience to not make mistakes in using the administrator tools.) ais523 15:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.