Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Abela2006


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Abela2006
Final (1/3/1); Ended 04:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

-.


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept the nomination.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I can do anything needed.... from pictures that are copyrighted, to citing sources, whatever.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: I have not really added any articles..... I normally just go in and add new information, correct information, or fix grammar errors.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have not been in any conflicts. Im pretty easy to get along with.


 * General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion



Support
 * 1) I don't know, I've been on wiki for some time, (i finally registered an account :-)), but I think this guy is honest. Let him be an admin. We need honest people looking over wiki. Who cares if he only has 7 edits.   Dakotasrock 03:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC) — Dakotasrock (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Oppose
 * 1) Apologies, but clear WP:SNOW per malformed RFA and seven total edits under this user name. RadioKirk (u|t|c)  03:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong oppose way too inexperienced. Metros232 04:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Even stronger oppose because I just realized that the person who wants to fix grammar errors spelled grammar as "grammer". Metros232 04:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Please read the welcome note I've placed on your talk page. Most people consider 2000 edits and 3 months tenure as the bottom floor for gaining adminship; I highly recommend withdrawal. – Riana ঋ 04:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Moral neutral There's a need for at least some edits, even when the user appears honest, because actions do speak louder than words. Abela, please spend some time reading policies and guidelines, participating in activities like new pages patrol and deletion discussions. In enough time, I'm sure I could support you. Leebo T / C  04:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.