Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Adun12


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Adun12
Final (0/6/2) Ended 05:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

- I am vehemently anti-vandalism, and I wish to further pursue the vandals who mar our wonderful information repository. Adun 02:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept nomination.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I would revel in the ability to sort through backlogs, especially those pages nominated for deletion, and users nominated for blocking.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: All of my most recent anti-vandalism work has been my favorite.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have had one conflict with another user. It was a misunderstanding caused by concurrent edits, where I accidentally chose his name instead of the actual vandal's when warning. I remained calm, and I responded appropriatly by apologizing for my mistake and reversing the things I had done. The conversation can be viewed on my talk page.


 * General comments


 * See Adun12's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.



Discussion



Support

Oppose


 * 1) Oppose. I'm sorry, but you have too little experience. Come back in a few months, after getting both more experience and experience that isn't vandal fighting. -Amark moo! 02:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose poor answers to questions (1 sentance is not enough) and not enough experience. Cbrown1023 talk 02:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Sorry, I hate editcountis, and really want us to lower the numbers, but this is toooo low, suggest withdrawal at this time.--Docg 02:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose per above Arfan (Talk) 02:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. Please follow the suggestions by Heligoland and you'll do fine.  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose not even 500 edits. Dionyseus 04:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) A couple of months experience and a good few hundred edits, so your off to a brilliant start. You'll need to edit in some different areas and perhaps increase your edit rate (try WP:TWINKLE) and write a little of whatever you know about and if you come back here in a few months, I'm sure you would likely pass. If your unsure as to why I or the others have opposed, please read Successful_adminship_candidacies which shows what level of contributions and experience admins need to have these days. --  Heligo  land   02:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) A productive and very well-meaning editor. Just wait about three months and ~2500-3000 edits and you should tear apart your next RfA. Most of your edits are in the last week-and-a-half and there's no evidence you have sufficient experience with Wikipedia policy, especially apart from vandal-fighting. You might try WP:AFD once in a while. ;-) Grand  master  ka  04:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.