Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aj00200

aj00200
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 15:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

- I love wikipedia, and I just want it to be the best it can be. Please vote for me if you want wikipedia to be at its best --AJ00200 (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept--AJ00200 (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrator work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Anything I can do to make Wikipedia better for all. I would really like to help make sure that pages aren't vandalized, because I seen some of this going unstopped.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I don't really know, some people might find my user page funny, others might say its bad. Also the Geek Fact of the Month on my user page is very informative.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:Yes, but it's no big deal, I plan on contacting that person, and pointing out that they were wrong.

General comments

 * Links for aj00200:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.''

Support

 * Let this guy be an administrator, after all, it's just one more administrator to help Wikipedia.
 * No suffrage for IPs. Avruch  T 18:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Please follow the rules. --AJ00200 (talk) 18:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Very little experience; his userpage alone is a catalog of style and spelling errors. As for the questions; they are answered briefly and incompletely, and userpage edits dont count as useful contributions; we're looking for things that make wikipedia better, not "things people might find funny". if you cant fill out these questions with at least a paragraph of info its a good sign you shouldnt be applying. Ironholds (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Little or no experience. Less than 250 edits, and most of them are userspace edits. Rarely uses edit summaries, little or no participation in admin related areas, and the answers to the questions worry me, as well. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  16:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)