Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Angelo1345


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

angelo1345
Final (0/6/0); ended 13:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC) by Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC) per WP:SNOW. Originally scheduled to end 12:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination
– Hello Wikipedians, i am just want to pass my nomination. I want to become an administrator because i want to represent the Philippines in the English Wikipedia. I can face all the questions that you will gave to me.Angelo1345 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:

The News because i see that the english wikipedia's news is not that very updated. Like Roger Elbert's Death it has been a week in the Main Page. i can create new contents on the main page that has no problems. My country Philippines if Filipino wikipedians will have copyright violations and other mistakes i am the one to take part of it.
 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:

Articles about the people and events from the Philippines. Because, i just want to represent my country in the English Wikipedia. And
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

None, Filipinos are known of being friendly and hospitable, If that will happen, all that i can do is to be humble and low-profile, I will respect his/her opinions.

'''Additional question from Leaky


 * 4. You state on your user page that you have been editing on WP for 7 and a half years, since the age of 10 and a half. Your current account is about 7 months old. Please clarify.
 * A:

But im sorry, but i stated that i have been on wikipedia for 4 years. I admitted that i have stated that i have been editing on WP for 7 and a half years. Because i have been copied many userbox from another user for adding it to my userpage because we are similar but i did'nt notice it. So i edited it to 4 years because i have been editing for wikipedia since 2009 that i decided to not to create an account so i am using I.P Adress on many shared computers in ComputerCafe Shop. But since i bought my computer, i have decided to create my account but my platform for being an admin is clean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelo1345 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

General comments

 * Given that the candidate has just been Blocked for votestacking, may I suggest that we close this out sooner rather than later? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Edit conflicted - nevermind. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Links for angelo1345:
 * Edit summary usage for angelo1345 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) I am supporting you for our country, even i am new to wikipedia. You are our representative ! GO GO GO ! ThePHAdvocate (talk) 12:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC) — ThePHAdvocate (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * 2) Your advocacy is good and i support it, i also love my country but next time you should sign your posts - AmericanJohn33 (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC) — AmericanJohn33 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Oppose

 * 1) Sorry, but you don't have enough documented experience to convince me that you are ready for this. Deb (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong oppose - Sorry, but the fact you didn't sign your post means you're not familiar enough with Wikipedia to be able to handle the tools responsibly enough.  Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   12:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong oppose -- occasional editor with barely any relevant experience. Please take time contributing to the encyclopedia before seeking a senior position. Evidence of POV here and on userpage. Poor English. Only 16% edit summaries on major edits, 0% on minor edits. --Stfg (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Obvious oppose Unsuitable on so many levels at this time. Improve your written English and come back in 2015. Leaky  Caldron  12:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. I don't think the problem with your English is an issue here - it's self-correcting, eventually. But you can't rely on 4 years of experience on an account that is 7 months old with only 300-some-odd edits. If you had other accounts, we'd need to see those as well. I get the impression that you're eager and want to help out, but you don't seem to have the requisite experience necessary to become an admin on enwiki. It's possible this is a case of WP:NOTNOW as opposed to WP:NOTEVER, so who knows? Edit well and reliably for a time and we'll see. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Since the two supports above are socks of the applicant, is it maybe a case of WP:NOTEVER after all? (I mentioned poor English because admins have to communicate with tense users, and good language skills are necessary to do that well. It's not just good grammar and usage, but especially command of nuance, and that isn't self-correcting, is it?) --Stfg (talk) 13:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose I'm afraid you don't have anything like the experience and qualifications people look for in potential administrators. For instance you only have about 300 edits. For a request for adminship to be taken seriously you would need at least several thousand. Hut 8.5 13:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Not enough documented experience and the motivations for wanting to become an admin are things which could be done without administrator userrights.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   13:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.