Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Angie Y.


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Angie Y.
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 00:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

- Is sweet, gentle, nice, has HFA, hates DIMEists Angie Y. 00:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Thank you so much. I accept!

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * '''A:User blocking and warning. I want to stand up for the community.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:My best contributions are contributions made to articlles concerning my favorite TV shows, like Code Lyoko, Danny Phantom, and Sailor Moon among others.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:When I first joined here? No, but Ned Scott and TTN are giving me grief now. We haven't dealt with it completely yet, but in the future maybe we will. I feel that the Wikipedians have been bullied long enough.

General comments

 * See Angie Y.'s edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Angie Y.:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Angie Y. before commenting.''

Discussion


Support

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose for the sorely inadequate answers to questions, the "hates DIMEists" part of the nom, and this. Regarding the last, it is more of the fact that you filed a RfAr at such a premature stage rather than the dispute itself. — Kurykh  00:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, per Kurykh. User is currently involved in a dispute. Andre (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - Bad answers to questions and seem to be in a dispute, per Kurykh. Anonymous Dissident  Talk 01:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) You have a large edit-count, but, as we all should know by now, edit count isnt everything, and the answers to the questions were among the weakest I have ever seen.  Anonymous Dissident  Talk 00:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.