Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ant2387


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Ant2387
Final: (0/3/0) Closed per WP:NOTNOW. Shereth 21:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination
– I am a good cadidate for adminship and make a good job pday2387 (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Any Administrative work would suit me as I am a good observer and I like to keep things in order


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions to wikipedia are those related to TV as I watch alot of it and know quite alot


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No

General comments

 * Links for Ant2387:
 * Edit summary usage for Ant2387 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Ant2387 before commenting.''

Discussion

 * With less than 200 edits, and very little time spent editing, I don't think you have a very good chance of passing. I suggest a snow close. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 21:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Sorry, but every single post on your talkpage is a warning. – iride  scent  21:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Per iride scent, and you have been here for 5 weeks, not even 200 edits. Suggest close because there is no chance this can succeed. →  ROUX   ₪  21:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Thank you for submitting your RFA. While I applaud enthusiasm, I'm afraid you do not yet possess sufficient knowledge and experience for the community to have confidence in your readiness to become an admin. But that does not mean that we will never have confidence in you.
 * Generally, It has been my experience that it takes at least 3,000 edits in a variety of areas to learn policy and guidelines well enough to attempt adminship. Nominees need to show the ability to contribute a number of significant edits to build the encyclopedia.
 * The Admin tools allow the user to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect and unprotect pages. Nominees will therefore do well to gain experience and familiarity with such areas as WP:AIV, WP:AFD, WP:CSD, Protection policy, and WP:BLOCK to learn when to do these things.
 * Adminship inevitably leads one to 1) need to explain clearly the reasons for one's decisions, 2) need to review one's decisions and change one's mind when it is reasonable to do so, 3) need to review one's decisions and stand firm when it is reasonable to do so, 4) need to negotiate a compromise. Admins need a familiarity with dispute resolution. The ability to communicate clearly is essential.
 * Article building is the raison d'être of Wikipedia. I recommend significant participation in WP:GA or WP:FA as the surest way to gain article building experience.
 * My suggestion would be to withdraw and try again in another 3 months and 3000 edits. Many nominees have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review or to receive Admin coaching before submitting their RfA and after passing that benchmark. Hope this helps. Good luck and happy editing.  Giants27  ( c  |  s ) 21:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My suggestion would be to withdraw and try again in another 3 months and 3000 edits. Many nominees have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review or to receive Admin coaching before submitting their RfA and after passing that benchmark. Hope this helps. Good luck and happy editing.  Giants27  ( c  |  s ) 21:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.