Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BigDT

BigDT
[ Discuss here]  (0/0/0) ending 17:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

– I offer a nomination of BigDT to receive administrator rights. I cannot say I have been lifelong pals with the editor, but a number of incredibly civil responses in an AfD I too am participating in made me take a look at his contribution history, and his talk page and contribution history seem to show that he is civil in his interactions with other editors, even those with whom he disagrees. I believe his edit history shows an admirably heavy exopedian and wikignomish streak, all of these being extremely (in my mind) admirable traits for administrators to have. I think his contribution history shows that his contributions to Wikipedia have been very solid since his time here, and I think he deserves an examination by the community for consideration for the mop and bucket. &mdash; Mike &bull; 17:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Decline. I thank you for the kind words.  However, given that users with more time and edits than I have are frequently turned opposed largely on the basis of time and edit count, I don't know that there would be much point in going through the process at this point in time. BigDT 19:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support


 * Oppose


 * Neutral


 * Comments

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: