Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BlakeCS


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

BlakeCS
[ Final] (0/7/0); Ended Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:55:53 (UTC)

- My name is Blake BlakeCS 02:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: That I want to delete articles and protect articles and block users.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: I keep editing them.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Yes.


 * General comments


 * See BlakeCS's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.



Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion



Support

Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Oppose - Suggest withdrawal.↔NMajdan &bull;talk 03:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. Hi Blake, you seem like a great editor but I'm afraid you don't really have enough experience for adminship yet. Keep editing as you have been for a few more months and maybe start contributing in deletion debates and such. At the moment its a bit early for the blocking and deleting tools. You might want to read Guide to requests for adminship. Next time round I suggest you take a little more time answering the questions as well- fuller answers are rather expected. WjBscribe 03:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose per lack of experience and insufficient answers to questions. Suggest speedy withdrawal. Pascal.Tesson 04:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose - far too little time on Wikipedia. Far too few edits.  Far too brief in the answer to the candidate questions.  Far too uniformed about this process.  I suggest the nomiantion be withdrawn by the nominee.  If you don't know exactly how to do that you can just indicate here that you wish to withdraw and one of us will take care of it.  Good luck in your other endeavors. Johntex\talk 04:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. Suggest withdrawal.  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose suggest withdrawl per above reasons. Shouldn't take this too bad however.--Jersey Devil 05:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose - Too little experience-- SU IT  양복 06:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.