Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bling-chav


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Bling-chav
[ Vote here]  (0/3/0) ending 12:35 9 February 2006 (UTC)

– Wikipedia is very very cool. Wikipedia is very very cool. RfA rocks! Bling-chav 12:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I've nominated myself, so yes.

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Strong oppose, obvious reasons. Having a joke rfa in disrupting Wikipedia is one thing; having a decent understanding of how to go about doing rfa properly is another. Not realizing that one doesn't normally neglect one's questions and a proper thesis on one's own adminship nomination is just the tip of an iceberg of things Bling-Chav has yet to learn about how Wikipedia works. The rfa is perhaps on good faith, but this user hasn't demonstrated a consistent grasp of policy and is not nearly ready enough for me to trust that he would make a decent admin or wikipedian. -ZeroTalk 16:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Account made only a few days ago. Zero contributions to the main article namespace. Recommend withdrawal. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Is this a joke? Bureacrat should remove this. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 15:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments


 * Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 1 major and 1 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces. Mathbot 12:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * See Bling-chav's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.




 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.