Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bugalugs13


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Bugalugs13
Final (0/2/1); Withdrawn by candidate at 13:53 UTC, 15 August 2008

- Often contributes to Wikipedia, often helps people with their problems, and will be willing to actively fight vandalism and prevent further vandalism from occuring.It's the weird one! / Chat to me? 13:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept my self-nomination. I am withdrawing my nomination. I may re-request at a later date.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Actively fighting vandalism, and protecting pages from further vandalism.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I have edited several articles a) to give references where they were previously unsourced, b) to add major updates of subjects as they occur, and c) I have helped several users (displaying the template) with problems they may have encountered whilst using Wikipedia.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, I have not been involved in edit conflicts.

General comments

 * See Bugalugs13's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Bugalugs13:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Bugalugs13 before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose for now. Has only 275 edits in more than two years George The Dragon (talk) 13:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Case of WP:NOTNOW. Frank contacted the user and asked him to consider withdrawal.  So Why  review me! 13:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral per not enough edits to evaluate. I've suggested withdrawal to the candidate. Would also recommend use of edit summaries in the future. Frank  |  talk  13:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.